Ether the only path to unifying cosmic forces

[Michael Anteski]

I consider quantum theory to be quite different from my aether model. To cite just one type of observation as an example, there is the observation which quantum physics calls "quantum entanglement" (a clever phrase, but quantum mechanics really doesn't explain what is going on there.)

Einstein famously referred to this kind of effect as being "spooky." -Yet my model of the aether can account for it readily.

In my model, the aether is mainly composed of elemental energic units, originally derived from oscillations of elemental points of original space. -Although I have referred to these aether units as being "contiguous," that description is only true in the sense of how it acts energically. In my model, aether units are not physically contiguous, but they are contiguous in the sense of being able to radiate their energic vibrations widely enough to form connections among the array of potential other units within vibratory-resonance range, distances within reach according to reciprocity parameters.

Therefore, this represents a logical explanation for the effect mentioned above, so-called "action-at-a-distance," which quantum theories do not. -An energy unit highly resonant with another one will react the same when one of them is tweaked, even after the two have been separated by a great distance. -With my aether model, the second unit "feels" the change via the common vibratory properties shared by the two units, even at great distances, because of the contiguous aetheric energy pathway conducting energic impulses through space.

[Michael Anteski]

Checking over my last post, I left out a few details that would be important for this model of quantum entanglement. I'll add those, to better clarify the model.

In this model for action-at-a-distance, the energy units that are seen to react together are quantum-scale energy units, such as electrons. They react together even though the distance separating them appears too great for quantum forces to be involved. -The basic idea is that forces other than quantum forces are in play here. How could this be?

We know that ordinary observable quantum forces involve spin, and cross vectors of space, to produce the energic effects we observe. -To explain action-at-a-distance, the idea is that an additional kind of force is also in play - vibrational forces that operate in an undetected, underlying elemental-ether network of energy units - a network, or sort of fundamental energy-matrix, which our observable quantum energy units and quantum forces have originated from.

When the action-at-a-distance phenomenon is seen, I propose that what is happening is that uniform, identical, elemental units of the ether serve as a fundamental, energy-continuum and contiguum through which energic impulses travel through space via energic vibrations. Vibrational ether resonances only occur between elemental ether units. -These resonances can be between two "free" elemental units, or between a free elemental unit and another elemental unit that forms part of a larger energy unit such as a sub-quantum electron.

When we observe a pair of closely-resonant quantum units behaving "together" when one of them is tweaked, even though they are separated by distances apparently too great for quantum forces to be acting, what I propose is happening is that the close similarity between the two larger units, in terms of their elemental-ether constituents, is transmitted through the underlying ether energy matrix, vibrationally, so that the quantum pair remain "in touch." -Then, when one of the two is tweaked, the other one "feels," or recognizes, this change, via the universe of impulse transmissions through the ether matrix.

[Michael Anteski]

This is to add a further explanatory concept. -In my model, it's proposed that the ether's elemental units interconnect, in some way, to form larger units, such as quantum-scale units. The way this could happen is the following.

In my model, the regions on and near earth are viewed as "quantized" compared to space, which tends more to be etheric, with less quantum-scale forces. In my model, the earth's magnetic energy field would be more densely etheric, and stronger, than is presently appreciated according to our quantal methodology. -Why does that lead the elemental ether units to produce quantum-scale energy units?

Elemental units radiate their vibrations widely enough to form loose connections (not "fixed" connections) with other elemental units. These connections, or resonations, are simple and linear, from one elemental unit to the next elemental unit. (Only with the much larger quantum-scale forces do we find such energy processes as spin, vectors, non-linearity, and so on.) -In a densely energic region like earth, the elemental ether units are crowded closer together, making them form wave-like, linear, alignments, or entrainments, which resonate more strongly, producing the larger, quantum-scale, energy units. -While these larger energy units have their own quantum energy properties, in addition, being made up of elemental ether units, they retain the ability to resonate vibrationally with the underlying elemental ether energy matrix, This becomes clear in the phenomenon of action-at-a-distance.

[Michael Anteski]

I think I can clarify the next-to-last Post (of Feb. 19) which gave a model for action-at-a-distance, otherwise called "quantum entanglement," in physics.

My clarified ether-theory for action at a distance - So called quantum entanglement represents radiated packets of etheric energy which have the same vibratory pattern. Elemental etheric units are the only actual participants in this phenomenon, with the quantum units in question being kinetically "walled off," like cool arms of a quiet purring mechanism which can turn itself on and off, by itself, any time.