Jerry Iuliano points out a correspondence between the 27 levels of the electron and various mythologies of various civilizations.
Eugene B. Pamfiloff believes that the electron is comprised of 27 individual units of energy called a Geatron which is according to Pamfiloff exactly expressed by the value .018926578 Mev/(c^=2).
Brown University physicist proposes that electron may be split in two parts.
Brown University professor of physics and engineering, Humphrey Maris proposes that it is possible to split the electron. A paper describing the theory appears in the Aug. 1 Journal of Low Temperature Physics. Maris presented his research at the International Conference on Quantum Fluids and Solids, held in June at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis.
Several colleagues have suggested that I bring the public up to date with some new developments related to my work in particle physics. It appears that the results of several recent experiments at Brown University have proven major aspects of my work.
Dr. Humphrey Maris and his team, while zapping liquid He4 with infrared light obtained an unexpected result. It appeared that an electron split into two parts, with each part suspended in separate bubbles.
These experiments and results were announced on August 1, 2000. Naturally, this observation was shocking, as it not only defied The Standard Model Theory, but also placed quarks into a new category, that of the Non-existent.
Moreover, the results have proven that the electron is a composite entity rather than a virtual finite entity, which is one of the major principles of my work. According to statements by Maris, Modern Theory has no explanation for these results. However, my work not only predicted these results many years ago, but easily explains the products, as follows:
Electron Composition: The Electron is composed of 3-Stages, with each Stage composed of 9 Geatron particles of energy, with each particle possessing a Mass of: m =3D 0.018926578 MeV/c2 Pfc, for a total of 27 fundamental Geatron particles of energy contained within the electrons' configuration. Each Stage has a Mass of: m =3D 0.170339202 MeV/c2
During Maris experiment, after exposure to low frequency Infrared Light, the electron split into two as described by the Geatron principles:
Stage I and II remained intact yielding a Mass of m =3D 0.340678404 MeV/c2 and possessing a neutral charge due to the cancellation of charges between Stages I and II.
Stage III, which is loosely held or bound, as compared to Stages I & II, dislodged yielding a Mass of m =3D 0.170339202 MeV/c2 and possessing a negative electric charge. The experiments of Dr. Maris yielded an unexpected result leading to an obvious conclusion, "the composite nature of the electron".
However, my work predates that of Dr. Maris by several years and not only predicted the results he obtained, but also is capable of explaining the exact results in terms of resultant mass and electric charge, and the exact sequence of electron fragmentation that will occur at various input energy levels. As a result, many of my friends and colleagues who are familiar with my work and these new developments are now very excited about the prospects of work recognition.
The 82944 form expresses this energy exactly.
In a message dated 3/17/01 10:50:23 PM Eastern Standard Time,
JerryIuliano@aol.com writes:
Formula as follows:
(ERC) 20.62994267 inches = [186282.0245*(10^10)*5280/299792458]^(1/8)
Here one has inches, feet, miles, metric, and Egyptian Royal Cubit in one equation.
Mr. Iuliano's stunning formula appeared as I was reading Chapter 4 of Barron's on-line book. While it is particularly unfair to the overall thesis to pull snatches of text out of context, I do so merely to illuminate a point. The following is a long quote from Chapt.4:
Although Penrose is perfectly well aware that number or mathematical Platonism, is "a product of the intellect alone", he fails to draw the obvious conclusion from his insight; if a "dead" number does not exist in the universe per se, then this fact by itself means that it will be impossible to arrive at a viable GUT in terms of a mathematical physicist's model!
To get to the point, when we question Einstein’s theory of general relativity (which gives the same predictions as Newton’s theory of gravitation provided the velocities involved are small compared with that of light, and the gravitational fields are not excessively strong) -- as Einstein himself had once questioned the Absolute Space and Time of Newton -- we begin to wonder why space-time should be treated as comprising three dimensions of space -- yet only one of time. There simply seems to be a curious psychological inconsistency in speaking of only a single time dimension. For is not time, too, in a sense, multidimensional? As space comprises height, breadth, depth, does not time possess dimensionality in relation to past, present, and future?
If space-time -- in which all the fields and particles in the cosmos reside has, according to the theory of relativity, a variable structure that itself directly describes gravity (with the effect that the 'arena' of space-time joins in the very action taking place within itself!) then the realisation that there is more than one time dimension invites new psycho-logical ways of considering the psycho-physical categories of space and time, 'good' and 'bad'. [See Note below for an interpretation of the expression 'good' in terms of the ambiguity between rotation/oscillation (as encountered in thermodynamics).]
Mathematics seeks to eliminate any living component from the objects it examines. But to do this is to restrict the psychesoma's -- and indeed the universe's --own experience of "space" to that of dead geometry. Because every aspect of geometry is inseparable from the notion of dimensionality, we now need to define precisely what a 'dimension' means.
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:53:34 EST
From:
TomBuoyed@aol.com
Subject: fine structure constant
Jerry,
Many thanks for your wonderful research into the mathematical basis of modern physics and ancient wisdom. I am intrigued by your statement that the fine structure constant is the "carrier of the collective unconscious." This conclusion is in direct agreement with the cosmology of Arthur M. Young, in which he sees the fine structure constant as the transition from the first level of the photon, outside of space and time, with no substance and no form, to the second level of nuclear particles which are still not in space, but do enter the stream of time. Thus they have substance, but still no form, and therefore cannot yet be objectified.
(Level 3 is that of Atoms which are in space but not in time, with form but not substance, and therefore atoms are conceptual entities (just as the architect's drawing of a house is a concept of the house itself). Finally Level 4 is that of Molecules, which combine substance and form and are in space and time. )
Each of these 4 levels expresses a different ontological category, going from:
(1) SPIRIT to (2) SOUL to (3) MIND to (4) BODY.
Thus the fine structure constant is the transition from the level of the spirit to the level of the soul. The soul exists in time but not in space, whereas the spirit is neither in space nor in time.
If, as you say, the fine structure constant is the "carrier of the collective unconscious," then that indicates the soul-like nature of the unconscious as it "precipitates" into time from out of the spirit. I would appreciate any more insights you may have in this area, especially concerning the critical distinction between soul and spirit.
Tom Mellett
Dept. of Physics
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, TN
Thanks for the new information. I know I am on the right track now because I have never heard of the Ma'at, Stechini's work nor Tompkins (Jungian collective unconscious or sychronicity).
The formula I derived comes from pure physical constants with 10th order accuracy. So this is what I would call as proof of the "collective unconscious" effect noted by Jung and others. There is order of human mind and the physical constants that makes up the matter that makes the mind that imagines the form that rules the matter that creates the universe as a pure mathematical net of modular forms which obey very restrictive laws (edgeness) and these laws can be broken only through the complex form (i) imaginary.
This means complex mathematics is useless as a tool to express the Euclidian form of reality. The Egyptians knew this. All of the Euclidian particles of Nature can be derived from normal mathematics that is derived from the Cheops pyramid constructs. We're talking, that I can prove that the EXACT values (NIST) of the Euclidian particles:
Proton, Neutron and Electron and the mysterious constant that governs their actions, fine-structure constant (137.035999935), are derived in mathematical detail by using only 2 number constants, the height and base leg of the Cheops pyramid at Giza. This is as simple as it gets. 1+1=2. The Cheops pyramid is the equivalent to the monolith from Arthur C. Clarke's 2001 a Space Oddessy.
J.Iuliano
The following formula shows the orbits of the Pi variables that influence the action of the electron (.510998902 Mev...NIST 1998) on the shells of the proton mass (938.271998 Mev...NIST 1998):
(938.271998*10)^[((.510998902^(-1/Pi))/Pi]= Cos 137.0360015...in radians
The shells are guarded by the gate-keeper only allowing possession of a fine-structure key (angle) to gain entry. 137.035999935 is entry key, the inverse of fine-structure. The square of this inverse (distance) is the collective unconscious link to spiritual ...mind.
This is the metric 37 degree Celsius heat of sentient mind-body, the amplitude of a real electron to emit or absorb a real photon, or electron shell changing key. The action allowed by fine-structure on the charged +1, base weight 938.271998 is only through the total weight of the electron to the power of negative inverse Pi. This total weight .510998902^(-1/Pi) showing -1/Pi units of freedom is then divided by the ratio of least time Circumference divided by Diameter or Pi. This energy matter form involving Pi actions on the electron can be reduced to a harmonic derivitive that is entwined in the human mind. For example the Mayans of Mesoamerica and the Druids of Stonehenge England both used the same harmonic (288) in representations of their respective calendars (Pictun=288=Mayan); (double light=288=Druid):
So one could say, the proton-electron forms are anagalous to the ancient wisdom form. What makes the 82944 harmonic equal to 10 proton energies? It is the reduction of the actual action on the electron in physical energy terms to one of spiritual reduction to restrictive mathematical symbolism that shows the germ of collective unconscious. This is the uniting of spirit and matter. Even though unity does NOT actually equal the electron form (1.....510998902^(-1Pi)) nor does 82944 actually equal the 10 proton energies (82944...938.271998) these inequalities disappear when structured in the action number that regulates the allowances used in chemical shell changes, this number being the fine-structure constant 137.036.
This form of fine-structure (11.70623765...the inverse square root) is the spiritual force that connects man's constructed (pyramids, Stonehenge, etc) or man’s created religions, art, etc.) collective unconscious mathematical forms and ancient calendar references. For example; the Cheops pyramid ratio: 486.2560047 ft/763.81 ft an a-priori agreed upon dimensional construct that was built to this exact ratio is defined by the factor of the Egyptian Royal Cubit in inches through the fine-structure value
An example of modern collective unconscious effects that amplify the above phenomena is the case of Prof. Leahy (Philosophy/Theology) Loyola Univ....D.G. Leahy is a philosopher of intense thoughtfulness and penetrating insight into the phenomena of ancient wisdom and modern applications. He leads off his website with a two chapter interpretation of his famous "dream" number (2808) a seemingly generic number with no extraordinary abilities.
Leahy knew in his unconsciousness that this number WAS extraordinary and proceeded to prove it by its association to the master harmonic number from his studies of the triple logic cube (82944) and its association to fine-structure. I was also able to corroborate this numbers (2808) extraordinaryness through a set of formulas that use the same frame work as the collective unconscious used in the linking of religionic expressions.