The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
User avatar
Electro
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 8:24 pm

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Post by Electro » Wed Jun 15, 2016 4:06 pm

If you're referring to light being bent in a GR way, I disagree. According to EU, the lensing effect is caused by refraction through the “atmospheres” of stars and galaxies. Gravitational attraction is only between material bodies – bodies with mass – and that light waves have no mass, so cannot be affected by gravity.

As for distances to stars too far away for the parallax method, they use spectroscopy and brightness. I believe the potential for error is quite important.

moses
Posts: 1111
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Post by moses » Thu Jun 16, 2016 5:50 am

Electro,
light bends around stars, but we only have theories to explain this. What if the bending was a lot more about the light passing through the star's double layer. This would mean that light bends at the Solar double layer before it reaches Earth. This would make distance calculations incorrect by a big margin.

Cheers,
Mo

User avatar
JeffreyW
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Post by JeffreyW » Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:34 am

Electro wrote: Black holes don't even exist in the first place, and now they're trying to make us believe the so-called "gravitational waves" BS they're supposedly detecting are actually coming from two imaginary black holes that collided 1.4 billion light-years away.
Yea. The down side of mixing group think, huge egos, the abstraction of reality with math, illusion of the absence of ignorance (the Cornell Effect), and careerism is that you get fantasy confused for science.

I guess mixing fantasy with science is good for them ($$$$), unfortunately it is doing great harm to new minds that want to study astronomy. We have to teach younger minds to ignore that nonsense and study things that have physical reality such as the Sun and Earth.

It is good to remember as well, Mr. Stephen Hawking the patron saint of black hole fantasy had 30 years of misdirecting huge amounts of scientists under his belt. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucasian_ ... athematicsThat's an incredible amount of time to keep the sciences (astronomy/astrophysics in particular) derailed with rainy day physics. He lived in the UK, so I'm guessing the many overcast days prevented his ability to see actual stars more often than not, thus his focus on mythical mathematical conjuring. Just looking through a telescope would have been more beneficial, he could connect with reality that way.

We should learn from his mistakes. Never appoint mathematicians to the highest statuses, as well, do not let physics/math people keep those types of positions for longer than 4 years at a time, esp. with the rate science is progressing it just stagnates progress. They need to be changed, like baby diapers, and for the same reason.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4

User avatar
Electro
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 8:24 pm

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Post by Electro » Thu Jun 16, 2016 7:56 am

JeffreyW wrote:
Electro wrote: Black holes don't even exist in the first place, and now they're trying to make us believe the so-called "gravitational waves" BS they're supposedly detecting are actually coming from two imaginary black holes that collided 1.4 billion light-years away.
Yea. The down side of mixing group think, huge egos, the abstraction of reality with math, illusion of the absence of ignorance (the Cornell Effect), and careerism is that you get fantasy confused for science.

I guess mixing fantasy with science is good for them ($$$$), unfortunately it is doing great harm to new minds that want to study astronomy. We have to teach younger minds to ignore that nonsense and study things that have physical reality such as the Sun and Earth.

It is good to remember as well, Mr. Stephen Hawking the patron saint of black hole fantasy had 30 years of misdirecting huge amounts of scientists under his belt. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucasian_ ... athematicsThat's an incredible amount of time to keep the sciences (astronomy/astrophysics in particular) derailed with rainy day physics. He lived in the UK, so I'm guessing the many overcast days prevented his ability to see actual stars more often than not, thus his focus on mythical mathematical conjuring. Just looking through a telescope would have been more beneficial, he could connect with reality that way.

We should learn from his mistakes. Never appoint mathematicians to the highest statuses, as well, do not let physics/math people keep those types of positions for longer than 4 years at a time, esp. with the rate science is progressing it just stagnates progress. They need to be changed, like baby diapers, and for the same reason.
Like we said before, it's gonna take many more generations before they can consider other theories. Careers and money are a lot more important than knowledge these days...

User avatar
Electro
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 8:24 pm

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Post by Electro » Thu Jun 16, 2016 7:58 am

moses wrote:Electro,
light bends around stars, but we only have theories to explain this.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0409/0409124.pdf

kevin
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:17 am

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Post by kevin » Thu Jun 16, 2016 10:02 am

Electro wrote:
moses wrote:Electro,
light bends around stars, but we only have theories to explain this.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0409/0409124.pdf

Light is an occurance.....a consequence of fields meeting.
light therefore is not bending.
The occurance of light appearing to bending is the consequence of the meeting fields geometries.

There is no light in space...light is a stress consequence , which is measurable at the surface of this planet as near C.
We are hoodwinked by our limited senses.
Kevin

User avatar
JeffreyW
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Post by JeffreyW » Thu Jun 16, 2016 1:04 pm

Electro wrote:
Careers and money are a lot more important than knowledge these days...
That's the thing. I've changed my stance after beginning to understand the Ivory Towers' approach to human insight. They think all insight is method based and only suitable knowledge is bred from inside of huge bureaucratic institutions with layer after layer, and the only knowledgable people are the PhD's and master's holders. Which is similar to the military officer ranks. If they want new Lieutenant Colonels to command infantry batallions they don't outsource to Google or Home Depot's ranks, they have to home grow them. The same with academics. They don't want outsiders fixing their junk, they want to home grow them starting from college all the way up to tenured professor and what not. An outsider like myself will never been considered as knowledgable or have the skills required to fix their mess.

That's exactly why I wrote the Cornell effect. They DO value knowledge, they don't realize though much of their knowledge is false. It is an unawareness of their own great ignorance, under the guise of them thinking that education can weed out ignorance. The fact is, sometimes knowledge cannot weed out ignorance, it actually exacerbates it to the point of complete denial of new facts and insight.

It is a permanent ignorance that only the most educated can suffer from, and no amount of education can fix it. Its essentially the C.I.A.'s understanding: Everybody thinks they are the "good guy". The truth is that for this specific instance, the theory I'm developing, I'm perceived as the "bad guy" or "pseudoscientist". The reality is that regardless if establishment has many ideas correct and is solid in many approaches, they have the fundamental facts of stellar evolution/planet formation incorrect, so they are essentially the "bad guys". They are the Evil Empire like in Star Wars, the dark side if you will.

http://vixra.org/abs/1606.0098
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4

moses
Posts: 1111
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Post by moses » Thu Jun 16, 2016 4:07 pm

The light from a star is bent by refraction or gravity when passing the Sun. But what if there is a smaller effect of light bending as it approaches the Sun. So not gravity or refraction and not large enough to be picked up in star observations. But a big enough bending of light to greatly affect parallax calculations.

Cheers,
Mo

User avatar
D_Archer
Posts: 1255
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:01 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Post by D_Archer » Fri Jun 17, 2016 6:01 am

Plate tectonics just a stage in Earth’s life cycle:
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/pla ... life-cycle

--

Still working from misgivings of Earth formation etc, but at least Earth has a life cycle now.

Regards,
Daniel
- Shoot Forth Thunder -

User avatar
JeffreyW
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Post by JeffreyW » Fri Jun 17, 2016 7:13 am

D_Archer wrote:Plate tectonics just a stage in Earth’s life cycle:
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/pla ... life-cycle

--

Still working from misgivings of Earth formation etc, but at least Earth has a life cycle now.

Regards,
Daniel
yea I guess that's good. I suggest any new readers to this thread read David Pratt's essay on the issues with plate tectonics. http://www.davidpratt.info/lowman.htm
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4

User avatar
Electro
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 8:24 pm

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Post by Electro » Sat Jun 18, 2016 4:37 pm

I read a few articles about the gravitational wave bullshit detected with LIGO. Do any of you smell a stinking rat? LIGO is about as useless as the Large Hadron Collider. A big waste of tax payer's money.

Let's pretend black holes exist for a minute. They know for a fact, that not only one, but two black holes, "only" 4 billion light-years away actually collided and created waves detected on Earth, not in a satellite in space, with all possible interference! And we know it was those very specific black holes! Wow, they're freaking good! We still don't have proof black holes actually exist, and now we've found gravitational waves coming from them!

Read the following page on LIGO and see the numerous possible interferences that instrument has to filter before isolating a tiny wave 1/1000 the diameter of a proton. Do they take us for freaking idiots!?! Man, how gullible the general public and the government really are! It's scary! :o They need to prove everything coming from their God Einstein so much, that they're ready to throw anything they can at us! Incredible! :o

https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/page/faq

User avatar
JeffreyW
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Post by JeffreyW » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:54 am

Electro wrote:I read a few articles about the gravitational wave bullshit detected with LIGO. Do any of you smell a stinking rat? LIGO is about as useless as the Large Hadron Collider. A big waste of tax payer's money.

Let's pretend black holes exist for a minute. They know for a fact, that not only one, but two black holes, "only" 4 billion light-years away actually collided and created waves detected on Earth, not in a satellite in space, with all possible interference! And we know it was those very specific black holes! Wow, they're freaking good! We still don't have proof black holes actually exist, and now we've found gravitational waves coming from them!

Read the following page on LIGO and see the numerous possible interferences that instrument has to filter before isolating a tiny wave 1/1000 the diameter of a proton. Do they take us for freaking idiots!?! Man, how gullible the general public and the government really are! It's scary! :o They need to prove everything coming from their God Einstein so much, that they're ready to throw anything they can at us! Incredible! :o

https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/page/faq
Yea, I ignore their claims now. I use to get angry about the claims of gravitational waves and black holes, but now that I know that there needs to be something to keep the idiots busy and out of my business, I'm sort of okay with it. I mean, better keep the dolts occupied with nonsense or else they'll interfere with real work being done in astronomy/astrophysics.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4

User avatar
JeffreyW
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Post by JeffreyW » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:58 am

On that note, I present: The Laws of Hot Jupiters!!

http://vixra.org/abs/1606.0186

Free of dolt-review! Brand new! In the box!
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4

User avatar
Electro
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 8:24 pm

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Post by Electro » Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:01 pm

JeffreyW wrote:
Electro wrote:I read a few articles about the gravitational wave bullshit detected with LIGO. Do any of you smell a stinking rat? LIGO is about as useless as the Large Hadron Collider. A big waste of tax payer's money.

Let's pretend black holes exist for a minute. They know for a fact, that not only one, but two black holes, "only" 4 billion light-years away actually collided and created waves detected on Earth, not in a satellite in space, with all possible interference! And we know it was those very specific black holes! Wow, they're freaking good! We still don't have proof black holes actually exist, and now we've found gravitational waves coming from them!

Read the following page on LIGO and see the numerous possible interferences that instrument has to filter before isolating a tiny wave 1/1000 the diameter of a proton. Do they take us for freaking idiots!?! Man, how gullible the general public and the government really are! It's scary! :o They need to prove everything coming from their God Einstein so much, that they're ready to throw anything they can at us! Incredible! :o

https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/page/faq
Yea, I ignore their claims now. I use to get angry about the claims of gravitational waves and black holes, but now that I know that there needs to be something to keep the idiots busy and out of my business, I'm sort of okay with it. I mean, better keep the dolts occupied with nonsense or else they'll interfere with real work being done in astronomy/astrophysics.
And you can never give your opinion against that BS on forums. You are immediately ferociously attacked! They call you names, crank, idiot, uneducated...

User avatar
Electro
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 8:24 pm

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Post by Electro » Mon Jun 20, 2016 2:00 pm

Did you look at the following video? It's freaking hilarious BS! People actually believe this crap. A displacement of 1/1000 the diameter of a proton! And they have no doubt that it comes from an event that happened 1.3 billion years ago? This is absolutely preposterous!

http://www.space.com/32318-how-to-detec ... video.html

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests