You will not find one single reference to phase transitions.
And why would they, when it is assumed that plasma is all there is.
argumentum ad ignorantiam. Who is going to take the time to check?
Their theories neglect basic understanding of nature in favor of a mix of 17th century pseudo-religious mathematical formulations and fusion science fiction. They completely avoid the middle ground: Thermodynamics.
Tearing down other people will not build you up! You are good at finding fault in others, while ignoring your very serious flaws, ie., lack of scientific method , and hostile attitude to those who question your hypothesis.
http://m.iopscience.iop.org/0029-5515/1/2/001
http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0610007
Science attempts to apply some of the following criteria:
1) Skepticism of unsupported claims
2) Combination of an open mind with critical thinking
3) Attempts to repeat experimental results.
4) Requires testability
5) Seeks out falsifying data that would disprove a hypothesis
6) Uses descriptive language
7) Performs controlled experiments
8) Self-correcting
9) Relies on evidence and reason
10) Makes no claim for absolute or certain knowledge
11) Produces useful knowledge
Pseudoscience and religion relies on some of the following criteria:
1) Has a negative attitude to skepticism
2) Does not require critical thinking
3) Does not require experimental repeatability
4) Does not require tests
5) Does not accept falsifying data that would disprove a hypothesis
6) Uses vague language
7) Relies on anecdotal evidence
8) No self-correction
9) Relies on belief and faith
10) Makes absolute claims
11) Produces no useful knowledge
Any mention of basic thermodynamics on any science forum will get you ridicule and name calling
Evidently not!
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=
Maybe study this:
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/