Mars in Miniature

Hundreds of TPODs have been published since the summer of 2004. In particular, we invite discussion of present and recent TPODs, perhaps with additional links to earlier TPOD pages. Suggestions for future pages will be welcome. Effective TPOD drafts will be MORE than welcome and could be your opportunity to become a more active part of the Thunderbolts team.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
User avatar
MGmirkin
Moderator
Posts: 1667
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: Beaverton, Oregon, USA
Contact:

Mars in Miniature

Post by MGmirkin » Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:58 am

(Mars in Miniature; Apr 25, 2008)

Mars exhibits many formations whose shapes are independent of size. Could the scalar nature of electrical discharges be the reason?

[Read more] ...
"The purpose of science is to investigate the unexplained, not to explain the uninvestigated." ~Dr. Stephen Rorke
"For every PhD there is an equal and opposite PhD." ~Gibson's law

heretic5
Guest

Re: Mars in Miniature

Post by heretic5 » Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:44 pm

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opport ... 91L5M1.JPG linked to from the TPOD for 2008-04-25, offers a photo of what looks like water at the ends of the two middle "planks" of rock. If you look closely, you can see a few "blueberries" under the surface.

Steve Smith
Guest

Re: Mars in Miniature

Post by Steve Smith » Tue Apr 29, 2008 9:39 pm

Heretic means one who choses his own way.

Actually it isn't water, it's finely divided dust. One of the signs that electric currents blasted their way through the Matian surface strata is the ultra-fine dust, blueberries and glassified dunes. Electric currents "seize" the rock and cause it to tear itself apart from electrodynamic forces and electrostatic repulsion. Because most of the fine dust is iron oxide, it acts like a fluid in the presence of a strong magnetic field, so "rivers" of hematite probably flowed over the surface. That's probably why the cracks in the silicon dioxide "pavement" are filled with hematite dust.

heretic5
Guest

Re: Mars in Miniature

Post by heretic5 » Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:01 am

Hello Steve:)

Although I agree that there are "rivers" of dust, as you mention, my difficulty with the photo is that the space between the cracks seems to be nearly filled with something which seems to have the same transparency as water, or very clear ice. So "blueberries" can be seen above and below the surface.

My experience with terrestrial dust is that it is never as tranparent as water or ice. So I am a loss to suggest what the "bluberries" in the cracks might be submerged in, other than water or very clear ice. Wait a second, how about ammonia dissolved in water? No? Alright, if it's not water, not clear ice, not ammonia in water, not dust; then what is in the cracks which is sufficiently transparent that submerged "blueberries" can be seen below the surface? The mention of any and all other possibilities would be welcome.

Steve Smith
Guest

Re: Mars in Miniature

Post by Steve Smith » Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:48 am

There is no surface water on Mars.

heretic5
Guest

Re: Mars in Miniature

Post by heretic5 » Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:25 am

Hello Steve:)

If it is not water, then might it be a hydrocarbon?

Steve Smith
Guest

Re: Mars in Miniature

Post by Steve Smith » Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:35 am

You mean like a liquid CFC?

An important consideration that is being missed is that the atmospheric pressure on Mars is so low it would be like standing on the summit of a mountain six times taller than Mt. Everest -- it is 1/800 that of Earth. Any liquids, no matter their molecular density, would dissipate immediately.

What your eyes are interpreting as objects beneath the surface of a liquid is an illusion.

heretic5
Guest

Re: Mars in Miniature

Post by heretic5 » Wed Apr 30, 2008 9:00 am

Hello Steve:)

That illusions exist is not to be denied. That this might be one is certainly possible.

However that might be, this photo is justification for a robot to go and see. Hm. Wait, that's where we got the photo. It seems it would have been possible to have commanded the robot to put its instrument arm down into the crevice. If there were to have been a liquid in the crevice, it would have been optically detected by the lower part of the arm not being straight with the upper part.

But nobody thought to do that. Too late now. We are beginning to attempt the transition from a Type Zero civilization to a Type One; and it's looking bleak for us, IMO.

User avatar
MGmirkin
Moderator
Posts: 1667
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: Beaverton, Oregon, USA
Contact:

Re: Mars in Miniature

Post by MGmirkin » Fri May 09, 2008 4:45 pm

There does seem, however, to be liquid something on Mars. I think. Unfortunately, the HiRISE image link was lost when "Thunderbolts Forum 1.0" crashed and burned. I will have to check whether I retrieved that particular thread. But there was definitely something in one of the images that appeared to have been a liquid of some kind following existing topography. I assume it was either subliming CO2 or some other melting "frost" layer (be it ammonia or something else; I don't know)...

I'll see if I can track it down again... Granted, I don't believe it was in the region with the "blueberries." Probably was near one or the other pole.

Cheers,
~Michael Gmirkin
"The purpose of science is to investigate the unexplained, not to explain the uninvestigated." ~Dr. Stephen Rorke
"For every PhD there is an equal and opposite PhD." ~Gibson's law

heretic5
Guest

Re: Mars in Miniature

Post by heretic5 » Fri May 09, 2008 6:24 pm

MGmirkin wrote:There does seem, however, to be liquid something on Mars. I think. Unfortunately, the HiRISE image link was lost when "Thunderbolts Forum 1.0" crashed and burned. I will have to check whether I retrieved that particular thread. But there was definitely something in one of the images that appeared to have been a liquid of some kind following existing topography. I assume it was either subliming CO2 or some other melting "frost" layer (be it ammonia or something else; I don't know)...

I'll see if I can track it down again... Granted, I don't believe it was in the regionwith the "blueberries." Probably wasnear one or the other pole.

Cheers,
~Michael Gmirkin
Hello Michael:)

Here another "something".
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ ... B313R1.jpg

User avatar
MGmirkin
Moderator
Posts: 1667
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: Beaverton, Oregon, USA
Contact:

Re: Mars in Miniature

Post by MGmirkin » Sat May 10, 2008 6:00 pm

MGmirkin wrote:There does seem, however, to be liquid something on Mars. I think. Unfortunately, the HiRISE image link was lost when "Thunderbolts Forum 1.0" crashed and burned. I will have to check whether I retrieved that particular thread. But there was definitely something in one of the images that appeared to have been a liquid of some kind following existing topography. I assume it was either subliming CO2 or some other melting "frost" layer (be it ammonia or something else; I don't know)...

I'll see if I can track it down again... Granted, I don't believe it was in the region with the "blueberries." Probably was near one or the other pole.

Cheers,
~Michael Gmirkin
Now that I'm at home, I can confirm that the "Something Liquid on Mars" thread was one of the ones I managed to save from Google's cache.

Here's the relevant quote with the image(s) I was referring to as far as liquids:
Sat Nov 10, 2007, I wrote:So, okay, was browsing HiRISE just now and ran across this image:

(HiRISE at One Year: Student Image of the Week-Seasonal Changes of South Polar Dark Dune Field)
http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_003609_1110

Much to my surprise, on panning and scanning in the IAS viewer, I came across this region:

(Wide shot of some of the dark spots on the south polar dunes.)
Image

(Narrow shot of the side of a dune. Note the black circular-ish spot at the top, and the dark plume flowing down the side following the local topography. This appears to be something [finally] consistent with fluid motion! As opposed to so many features that appear to NOT follow local topography.)
Image

So, anyway, I figured I'd point this out. Look interesting. Any ideas on what this would be? Some have speculated sublimating CO2, some have speculated water, some have speculated sub-surface water. Nobody's quite sure, it seems.
So, yeah, something liquid this way comes? Hehe. As I said, different region, different scale, but it does appear to be liquid-like in behavior. One of the first shots I've seen that actually conforms to what one might assume liquids following the contours of pre-existing terrain should look like.

Cheers,
~Michael Gmirkin
"The purpose of science is to investigate the unexplained, not to explain the uninvestigated." ~Dr. Stephen Rorke
"For every PhD there is an equal and opposite PhD." ~Gibson's law

heretic5
Guest

Re: Mars in Miniature

Post by heretic5 » Sat May 10, 2008 6:18 pm

Excellent recovery. Thanks.

As for the flows, if I was in Oklahoma, I would know what it was - crude oil, maybe about the consistency of tar.

User avatar
MGmirkin
Moderator
Posts: 1667
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: Beaverton, Oregon, USA
Contact:

Re: Mars in Miniature

Post by MGmirkin » Tue May 13, 2008 1:33 pm

heretic5 wrote:Excellent recovery. Thanks.

As for the flows, if I was in Oklahoma, I would know what it was - crude oil, maybe about the consistency of tar.
Yeah, well, don't know if we can trust the "colors," as I figure most are false color to accentuate some feature or another...?

Other'n that... ;)

~Michael Gmirkin
"The purpose of science is to investigate the unexplained, not to explain the uninvestigated." ~Dr. Stephen Rorke
"For every PhD there is an equal and opposite PhD." ~Gibson's law

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests