TPOD: Detecting Double Layers

Hundreds of TPODs have been published since the summer of 2004. In particular, we invite discussion of present and recent TPODs, perhaps with additional links to earlier TPOD pages. Suggestions for future pages will be welcome. Effective TPOD drafts will be MORE than welcome and could be your opportunity to become a more active part of the Thunderbolts team.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
mharratsc
Posts: 1405
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:37 am

TPOD: Detecting Double Layers

Post by mharratsc » Tue Oct 26, 2010 7:11 am

Detecting Double Layers

This article really, really impresses me- it's written like an engineering bulletin you would expect to see posted on the wall of some electronics company as an FYI to their technical staff! 8-)

Speaking of which- I wonder if any of the 'higher-ups' might be friends with the folks who maintain the IEEE website? After all, since Plasma Cosmology is fully recognized by that organization, I wonder if they couldn't get a permanent TPOD link on the IEEE.org/aerospace/astrophysics page under the 'Content from our partners' column or something? Has anyone ever looked into that, I wonder?

In any event- this was an excellently presented article, Stephen! I really liked how you did this one. :)
Mike H.

"I have no fear to shout out my ignorance and let the Wise correct me, for every instance of such narrows the gulf between them and me." -- Michael A. Harrington

scotts
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:12 pm

Re: TPOD: Detecting Double Layers

Post by scotts » Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:53 pm

I like that they see another example of matter moving faster than the speed of light but write it off...

Nereid
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:21 am

Re: TPOD: Detecting Double Layers

Post by Nereid » Tue Dec 07, 2010 7:53 am

It's not clear, to me anyway, which of the papers (or preprints) which have Muxlow as an author form the (ultimate) basis for the New Scientist article that the TPOD cites (if anyone does know, for sure, please say so!)

The closest seems to be: "Discovery of an unusual new radio source in the star-forming galaxy M82: Faint supernova, supermassive blackhole, or an extra-galactic microquasar?" by Muxlow et al., published in May this year in MNRAS. While this is behind a paywall, you can read the preprint for free, from arXiv.

The abstract is:
Muxlow et al. wrote:A faint new radio source has been detected in the nuclear region of the starburst galaxy M82 using Multi-Element Radio-Linked Interferometer Network radio observations designed to monitor the flux density evolution of the recent bright supernova SN 2008iz. This new source was initially identified in observations made between 2009 May 1 and 5 but had not been present in observations made 1 week earlier, or in any previous observations of M82. In this Letter, we report the discovery of this new source and monitoring of its evolution over its first 9 months of existence. The true nature of this new source remains unclear, and we discuss whether this source is an unusual and faint supernova, a supermassive black hole associated with the nucleus of M82 or intriguingly the first detection of radio emission from an extragalactic microquasar.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests