Wikipedia + EU = Love

[Hygiliak]

An ironic title, I know, but still, sometimes you can find information that is not 100% mainstream

Like this, for example:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_c ... ccurrences

Apparently the solar wind is an electric current go wiki, go

Here is another example, this time a mix of truth and utter nonsense.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_ ... lt#Removal

Having problems with planetary double layers? No problem! We know people that can remove them in just under two months

[mharratsc]

Even more ironic- they use a picture of Kristian Birkeland's terella experiment to denote the Van Allen belts which they believe are generated entirely locally to the planet (hence why they think they can 'drain' them)!

[Hygiliak]

Here's actualy a good one:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliospheric_current_sheet

The only mistake I could find is the assumption that the rotating field is generated only by the sun's physical rotation (as opposed to galactic current input).