Sub-Quantum Kinetics, Tired Light

[junglelord]

Here is a interesting answer to the redshift discrepencies due to Violette's specific tired light, which if I understand it correctly is not the same "tired light" as mentioned by others.

Comparison to Cosmology and Astrophysics
Conventional Cosmology & Astrophysics

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subquantum Kinetics

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 The big bang theory proposes the counterintuitive notion that the universe emerged out of a state of nonexistence. Subquantum kinetics (SQK) avoids this problem. Proposes that physical form emerged from a preexisting ether substrate.

2 Fails to explain how subatomic particles originate. It merely postulates that they form out of the vacuum. SQK explains in detail how subatomic particles arise from subquantum fluctuations in the ether.

3 Fails to explain why our universe is made up of matter as opposed to antimatter. SQK predicts a matter/ antimatter bias to particle materialization.

4 Introduces the ad hoc assumption that the universe is expanding, in order to account for the cosmological redshift phenomenon. SQK naturally predicts a tired-light cosmological redshift effect without introducing any ad hoc assumptions.

5 The expanding universe model fails to make a good fit to astronomical data on four cosmology tests. The tired-light static universe cosmology makes a superior fit to astronomical data on all four cosmology tests.

6 Conventional cosmology fails to explain observations of galaxies with redshifts greater than 4.0. SQK accounts for the existence of galaxies having redshifts many times higher than 4.0.

7 Conventional physics fails to explain why the jovian planets and brown dwarfs fall along the M-L relation for low mass stars, attributes this to chance. SQK explains this conformance by predicting that planets, brown dwarfs, and low mass stars are similarly powered by genic energy.

8 Fails to explain the source of the excess heat coming from the Earth's core. SQK attributes the excess heat from the Earth's core to genic energy.

9 Fails to account for the inflection (at 0.45 solar masses) in the stellar luminosity function and for the accompanying upward bend in the stellar M-L relation. SQK explains this inflection and upward bend as arising from the onset of fusion energy production and the formation of a radiative core at the star's center.

10 Fails to adequately explain stellar pulsation. The SQK genic energy prediction explains this phenomenon.

11 Fails to explain the source of energy powering supernova explosions and why supernovae arise from blue giants. The SQK genic energy prediction explains this phenomenon.

12 Fails to account for the energy source powering galactic core explosions. The SQK genic energy prediction explains this phenomenon.

13 General relativity predicts that massive, highly luminous galactic cores should exist as matter-consuming black holes. But this prediction fails to conform with observation. SQK predicts that black holes should not form, that galactic cores should instead consist of very dense stellar bodies that continually create matter and energy. This predictionis supported by observation.


Note: genic energy is the name given to the excess energy that is produced by the photon blue-shifting phenomenon predicted by subquantum kinetics.
http://www.etheric.com/LaVioletteBooks/SQK-c.html

Energy Conservation and Photon Redshifting - prevailing concept (1978): At the time of this prediction, physicists and astronomers generally assume that photon energy is perfectly conserved and most attribute the cosmological redshift to the assumed expansion of space.


Prediction No. 3 (1978): As a basic requirement of the validity of its methodology, subquantum kinetics predicted that photons should gradually redshift with time when passing through regions of low (less negative) gravitational field potential, e.g. intergalactic space. It predicted a "tired-light effect," that distant galaxies should appear redshifted without the need of postulating recessional motion.



Verification (1979 - 1986): Dr. LaViolette checks this photon redshifting prediction by comparing the tired-light non-expanding universe model and the expanding universe model (standard Freidman cosmology) to observational data on four different cosmology tests. He demonstrates that the tired-light model consistently makes a closer fit to observational data on all tests. His findings, which were published in the Astrophysical Journal (1986), confirm the subquantum kinetics tired light prediction and the notion that the universe is cosmologically stationary. These findings undermine a key support of the big bang theory. An update of this evidence is presented in Chapter 7 of Subquantum Kinetics.



Energy Conservation and Energy Generation - prevailing concept (1978): At the time of this prediction, physicists and astronomers adhered to the idea that energy is perfectly conserved. Stars are assumed to generate their energy either through nuclear fusion or from heat released from gravitational accretion. Planets are instead thought to acquire their luminosity from stored heat. There is no reason to believe that planets should conform to the stellar mass-luminosity relation.


Prediction No. 4 (1978 - 1979): As a basic requirement of the validity of its methodology subquantum kinetics predicted that photons should gradually blueshift when passing through regions of high (more negative) gravitational field potential, e.g., within stars and planets and in interplanetary and interstellar space. It predicted that "genic energy" should be continuously created within all celestial bodies.



Verification (1979 - 1992): Dr. LaViolette tested this genic energy prediction by plotting the mass-luminosity coordinates of the jovian planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, and Uranus) to compare them with the mass-luminosity relation for red dwarf stars and found that both planets and stars conformed to the same relation. Other astronomers had not previously done this because doing so didn't make sense in the context of the conventional astrophysical paradigm. The required violation of energy conservation is 10 orders of magnitude smaller than what could be observed in laboratory experiments.

Verification (January 1995): Astronomers observing with the Hubble Space Telescope discovered that the star VB10 has a dynamic core, as indicated by the presence of explosive, magnetic-field-driven flares on its surface. VB10 has a mass of about 0.09 solar masses, which indicates that it borders between being a red dwarf and brown dwarf. Conventional theory predicts that this star should be on the border of being dead and hence should not have a strong magnetic field. Subquantum kinetics, which predicts that its interior should be dynamic and actively evolving genic energy, anticipates these results.
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=14275

[junglelord]

I must get myself this book by LaViolette.
Some reviews of this particular work, Genesis of the Cosmos.
it agrees with the assumption put forth by Arp, that as matter matures it gains mass which effects redshift.

If you can find the time to read just one book this decade that touches upon any of these vital topics, physics, religion, cosmology or mythology, this is the one to read. In Beyond the Big Bang [Genesis of the Cosmos], Dr. LaViolette builds a masterful and elegant new edifice of hard science. To do so, he uses well-known materials in a brilliant architecture never before envisioned by western science.

Along the way, he ably exposes the essential bankruptcy of the established Big Bang/Expanding Universe cosmology, elevates ancient Egyptian mythology to the status of a succinct metaphoric science lesson, and reduces a number of orthodox scientific principles to the status of myth. Quarks, gluons, virtual particles, the strong and weak nuclear forces, dark matter, special and general relativity, to name just a few cherished staples of twentieth century physics and astrophysics, all evaporate in the light of his insight.

Not content with such minor upheavals, LaViolette also creates what can only be called a new General Field Theory, shoehorns in legitimate space for a spiritual dimension in science, redefines Tarot, rediscovers Atlantis, and perhaps most astonishing of all, apparently restructures astrology.

Paul A. LaViolette is a doctor of systems science, and nothing it seems is safe from the penetrating analysis of applied systems theory. This is not science-lite. Nor yet another Chariot of the Gods-like amalgam of genuine mysteries, twisted facts and hysterical speculation, this is the well researched, beautifully ordered product of a highly trained and highly original mind. Equally important to all of us who will read it, the test itself is well planned and clearly written.

The main problem for Beyond the Big Bang [Genesis of the Cosmos] is simply its daring and its scope. LaViolette gives historical evidence that the Big Bang was a bust to impartial eyes decades ago. But Big Science continues to teach its party line in every university. Generations of bright young explorers are still given false maps of the "known world" in physics and told to extend the edges of that map, and that map only. How many thousand brilliant works have been wasted in this way? Anyone party to that crime will continue to resist the facts long after reasonable doubt has been satisfied. Nor are the vested interests among orthodox astrologers, professional Tarot readers and academic mythologists likely to turn hand springs upon hearing Dr. LaViolette's good news. So what if the new analysis makes better sense than the traditional tales? What "expert" really wants to rethink what she or he already knows?

Only the open, the curious, the innovative, the exploratory will welcome this huge intellectual challenge with open arms and probing mind. All others will hug the worn out teddy of a mechanical universe that started with a bang against their hearts, and whimper.

Thomas C. Chavez, Reflections Magazine, Fall 1996


A must read for the few open minded scientists out there...
This book hinges on the idea that we are on the verge of rediscovering an ancient knowledge. That "philosopher's stone" of physics - a grand unifying theory.
The author begins by explaining this theory - a continually transmuting ether of existence, akin to the Dirac Sea of virtual particles in quantum mechanics. A theory that describes how matter can be created from fluctuations in chaotic flux, and links gravity and electromagnetic forces. He then continues by providing evidence of how this theory was known long ago, and what implications it has for science and our future.
It does not rely, as one reviewer put it, on the "tired light" cosmology. It, instead, creates a living framework for the universe in which the Doppler red shift could also, to my mind, be explained by Hadrons putting on weight as they get older. This would also explain the "high red-shift, low red-shift at the same distance anomaly".
It is truly refreshing to find a mind that is not blinkered by the views of his peers and seeks to explore new pastures. Pastures that have not been specifically designed to keep the herd happy, and which the herd is equally scared to stray from.
If you are scientifically inclined, with an open mind and a desire to understand everything, then BUY THIS BOOK!
It may not give you all the answers, but it will certainly give you ideas...

Excerpted from a reader review


This book describes a fundamental mechanism for explaining the creation of our material universe which is at the same time new and old, and certainly very appealing. Paul LaViolette does an incredible job of weaving parallel notions from the most sophisticated physics, to everyday business ideas, to ideas from ancient manuscripts in a way that makes compelling the parallels he has uncovered. This brilliant synthesis of material from such diverse areas of human knowledge could only have been accomplished by a true systems scientist, and indeed, the general systems nature of the whole proposal makes it immensely appealing. This work should be given the greatest of attention by our world's thinkers.

George G. Lendaris, Ph.D., Professor of Systems Science & Electrical Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, OR


Subquantum Kinetics, an elegant alternative to the big bang.
One would suspect that the universe operates as a system analogous to natural systems which we obseve every day; Paul LaViolette has submitted a theory which posits exactly this. Leaving the patchwork ransom note of the big bang aside, LaViolette has outlined the course of physics in the next century and beyond. Beyond the Big Bang [Genesis of the Cosmos] takes bold steps to answer some of the most fundamental questions of existence, and represents another decoded piece of the ancient astronomical puzzle. Einstein would be pleased.
http://www.etheric.com/LaVioletteBooks/BBB-reviews.html