Gravity as an electromagnetic phenomena via WSM and LNH

[junglelord]

It is from this real electric field from the aether, that the phase pumped conjugation holographic grating system creates its non linear expression. The amount of power that can be produced is only limited to the size of the galaxy and or star, planet. Gravity makes a continual mirror expression of energy from the Aether. Charge's energy field is temporary, based on em pulsed fluctuations.

[StevenO]

Eeehm....well....OK. When you find your antigravity drive let me know.

[junglelord]

You need to read Paul Laviolette's book on Antigravity my good man.
Until you do, I have no idea how you can discount the work.
I have read it and I have to say, the man knows what he is talking about.

[StevenO]

You need to read Paul Laviolette's book on Antigravity my good man.
Until you do, I have no idea how you can discount the work.
I have read it and I have to say, the man knows what he is talking about.

From what I've read on his website I think most of his theories are just a pile of bull. I can find nothing there that tickles my brain.

[junglelord]

To each his own, I think the same about Miles.

[Grey Cloud]

As far as LaViolette's science goes I don't know enough science to comment but as to his mythology, it is either somebody else's idea, e.g. Schwaller, or his own rubbish.

[junglelord]

Again to each his own. Laviolette's work is already published stuff. Thats the point you two are missing.
Not published by him, by the military. His work is searching out what is available plus insider information.
If you two think that the military does not have antigravity, then we have to agree to disagree.
I think they do and I think that Violette's work is a good attempt at explaining how it works, via the data from TT Brown, Tesla, Maxwell, Faraday, and published military contracts.

I mean, even the levitation videos taped by John Hutchinson, from BC Canada, is clearly an electromagnetic/electrostatic standing wave resonance. He would use two Tesla Coils and a Van de Graaff generator and fiddle till he hit harmonic resonance with the three devices.

Does Miles theory explain that?
Do you think the military has antigravity drives?
Just wondering?
Thanks.

[Grey Cloud]

Hi Jl,
I neither know nor care whether the military has antigravity drives or not. But if LaViolette has sold his technology to the military then it's funny that he's still trying to turn a few quid selling books and dvd's on his website. Maybe that's just a cover?
Peace, brother.

[junglelord]

Now how can that be?
This is about electrogravitics.
Its takes a lot of money to finance these black budget operations.
I care, because these guys are doing it.
Laviolette just gives a plausible explanation into TT Brown electrogravitics and the B2 Stealth Bomber and the technology explained in other public papers and such that are part of the industrial/military complex.

Peace live long and prosper, dear brother.

[RayTomes]

...The wave models need this nonlinearity to get interfering or standing waves, IMHO unnecessary complexity without explanation.

Non-linearity of natural laws is essential. If electromagnetism was linear, then there could be no interaction with matter. Think about it. non-linearity and interaction are the same thing. If there was no interaction between e/m and matter then we could not see. We could not hear. We could not taste or smell or feel anything. Our entire awareness of nature is due to non-linearity. A linear universe is a non-observable universe.

In the WSM model it is all important, but it does not explain what the non-linearity is mechanically. How does the aether decide to be linear for some waves and non-linear for others?

The aether is always non-linear. But you are right that light travel appears to be linear. We can see across billions of light years through a line of sight that is criss-crossed by light going every which way. So this needs some explanation.

If you do some calculations, you will find that the local strength of the e/m field near an atomic particle is incredibly strong compared to light traveling between the stars. If you consider some non-linear function such as exp or log and then look at a region that is only 10^-10 or 10^-20 of that curve, then it becomes extremely linear in that region. So light apparent linearity is totally due to the very low intensity variations in open space.

In matter the e/m field is vastly stronger, especially in the direct vicinity of particles such as in the nucleus.

As regards a mechanical explanation, this is easily provided by comparing to every known case of a tensile medium. If you stretch something then its tension goes up. If you stretch the aether, then its tension goes up. When the tension goes up the wave propagation speed increases also. That is a non-linearity.

In particular, in my version of WSM, the particles have aether motion at right angles to the radius vector from the centre. This non-radial motion leads to stretching of the fastest moving parts of the aether which occur at each standing wave anti-node. The anti-nodes are therefore displaced outwards compared to the nodes. If you graph such a function then you find that it is full of harmonics of the original wavelength.

In a tensile medium, spherical standing waves MUST develop harmonics. Totally stable particles are not possible. This is a very important result that is totally ignored by everyone but me as far as I can tell.

It doesn't matter if you don't believe in an aether even, or even if you use standard theory. I say categorically that if we can observe some particle wave structures in any way at all then that means they must be non-linear waves and must therefore develop harmonics. That means that they must change over long time periods. There is no escaping this. Observation is only possible if there is change.

A stable wave structure that does not leak energy or interact with other matter is unobservable. An observed wave structure has leaked energy in order to be observed.

[junglelord]

If Miles is correct about the magnetic field and gravity, then we could make a UFO based on that theory and a intense rotating magnetic field, which is what I believe Wilbert Smith was doing in Project Magnet

My equations above apply to the E/M field, but I have expressed only the electrical part of the field. That is the part of the field that is in vector opposition to the gravitational acceleration. The magnetic field is, as we know, orthogonal to that, so we would expect it to have no affect in the direction of gravity. However, I have assumed in other papers that the magnetic component of the field is active in solar system and orbital perturbations, since it gives us the most direct explanation of sideways shoves. Since celestial mechanics describes the interaction of all the various parallel and perpendicular shoves, it is clear that the magnetic field interacts with gravity in this way. I have not included those interactions here, but I think it is clear how they must evolve out of my theory.