Supergalactic cluster waves and geological cycles

[RayTomes]

In large scale surveys of the Universe there are found to be huge megawalls of galaxies. A 128 Mpc/h periodicity in galaxy redshifts is observed by Tom Broadhurst, Richard Ellis, David Koo and Alex Szalay, in Nature vol 343 p726. Some cosmologists have suggested that this might be some sort of wave structure. Now that the Hubble constant has been determined to be about 71 km/s/Mpc we can say that this wave is around 588 million light years in length. It is clear from the data that there are also several shorter waves that appear to be half and quarter of that wavelength.

In geology, a series of long cycles have long been known and are estimated as 600, 300, 150, 74 and 37 million years in period. More recently, Moscow University Geology Prof S Afanasiev has (through his "Nanocycles Method") been able to accurately determine the period of the longest of these cycles to be 586.24 million years. There are many instances of other geology and climate related studies and cosmic ray fluctuations (which are suspected as a cause) finding periods near to 586, 293, 146, 73 and 36.5 million years.

We need to understand that a wave with wavelength 586 million light years will oscillate in a period of 586 million years if it has velocity c, which applies to electromagnetic and gravitational waves. Therefore it seems very likely that these two phenomena are in fact one. There are huge standing waves in space that lead to the formation of galactic superclusters and which also cause repeated fluctuations in cosmic rays, temperature and climate generally on Earth.

Furthermore, the fact that Prof Afanasiev has very accurately determined the cycle period allows us to use the 128 MPc/h redshift periodicity to determine the Hubble constant with great accuracy. Based on published data this gives H = 71.2 +/- 0.3 km/s/MPc, but a better analysis of the data using the obviously present harmonics also would allow improved accuracy with 0.1 or even 0.01 km/s/MPc being achievable.

This method bypasses the entire stepladder of distances in cosmology with all its various problems.

[junglelord]

There are huge standing waves in space that lead to the formation of galactic superclusters and which also cause repeated fluctuations in cosmic rays, temperature and climate generally on Earth.

I could not agree more.
Nice post.
Cheers

[GaryN]

Hi Ray,
I was going to welcome you with open arms after looking some at your site, I'm a cymatics fan and a great believer in the importance of vibration in the Universe. BUT, when I saw your post in the upper boards, I was 'shocked and amazed'.
It's true we don't have a united front when it comes to the exact role electricity plays in the Solar system or galaxies, but the evidence is building rapidly, in favor of electricity being equal partner to vibration.
Miles Mathis has been much discussed of late, and though I differ on the source of the electrical charge of the planets, his rework of the Titius Bode rule suggests that it is charge rather than gravity that determines the orbit AND orientation of the planets.

http://milesmathis.com/bode.html

As for the mass of the planets, this recent TB post may be of interest:

http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2009/ ... magine.htm

A big welcome anyway!

[RayTomes]

I was going to welcome you with open arms after looking some at your site, I'm a cymatics fan and a great believer in the importance of vibration in the Universe. BUT, when I saw your post in the upper boards, I was 'shocked and amazed'.

Well, my object there http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=2681&p=29036 was to settle the confusion that I have about what is maintained regarding electrical forces in the solar system. But let us keep that discussion over there.

...
A big welcome anyway!

Thanks Gary!

[kevin]

RayTomes,
Welcome, the cyclic nature of universe is something I have heard, once the resonance hit a certain level another voice inside me kicked in and started to inform Myself, the normal self, what I was hearing, most bizzare.
this happened at a megalithic site.
So Your post resonates with myselves very closely, but I have also been burn't by the same forces, so it's not an either or neither situation ,imho.
I find that the beehive constructions of megaliths are sited precisely to interact with the multiple alignments that are geometrically detectable, the content upon the various alignments alters in a cyclic manner, basically almost clocklike, by inducing our own resonances into these chambers We can thus interact with larger scale parts of universe.
Everything I detect follows fibonacci sequencing, keep it in mind always, sil vous plait.
http://www.maltatemples.com/NEWS.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCeD_6Y3GQc
Kevin

[RayTomes]

Welcome, the cyclic nature of universe is something I have heard, once the resonance hit a certain level another voice inside me kicked in and started to inform Myself, the normal self, what I was hearing, most bizzare.
this happened at a megalithic site.

Oh, that starts another whole interesting subject. Look up a guy called Thom who measured British Stone circles, e.g. http://www.ancient-wisdom.co.uk/megalithicyard.htm

It turns out that the old imperial units do follow the natural wavelengtsh of the universe quite closely (although correct measure about 1% smaller than imperial). My description of all this can be found here http://www.cropcircleresearch.com/articles/e009-natural.html

So Your post resonates with myselves very closely, but I have also been burn't by the same forces, so it's not an either or neither situation ,imho.
I find that the beehive constructions of megaliths are sited precisely to interact with the multiple alignments that are geometrically detectable, the content upon the various alignments alters in a cyclic manner, basically almost clocklike, by inducing our own resonances into these chambers We can thus interact with larger scale parts of universe.
Everything I detect follows fibonacci sequencing, keep it in mind always, sil vous plait.
http://www.maltatemples.com/NEWS.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCeD_6Y3GQc

I see Fibonacci (and golden proportion really) in plants but not in planets.

Yes, ancient people understood acoustics better than modern people.
Thanks for "Good Vibrations"! Very appropriate.

[junglelord]

Hi Ray and Kevin.
To me Fibonacci is = to PHI
I see PHI in the planets and the plants.
Kepler was right, but you must apply PHI to finish the equation.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=2306

THE PHI-SERIES AND THE SOLAR SYSTEM REVISITED



A4.1 EXPONENTIAL CONSTANTS
Up to the mid-point of Section III representations of the Solar System were largely logarithmic, two-dimensional in form, and also generally static in nature, despite discussions concerning periods of revolution, lap cycles, planetary orbits and varying velocities. Yet the complexity of the Solar System, its endless and varying motions, its waxings and wanings, its growth and decay, its anomalies and its regularities all suggest it is something far more than a mechanical clock or indeed anything that simplistic. But at least from the analyses presented in Section III there appears to be some justification for suggesting that an exponential component exists in the structure of the Solar System, and moreover, that remnants of it remain in the two log-linear zones and the three inverse-velocity relationships discussed in earlier sections. But where does this leave us? According to the methodology applied to the mean periods of revolution and the intervening synodic periods, the log-linearity in the Solar System largely translates into variants of the Phi-Series such that the mean periods (Sidereal and Synodic) increase sequentially by successive powers of Phi while the mean periods of the planets alone increase by Phi squared,

Correspondingly, because of the the third law of planetary motion and the relationship between the mean periods, mean distances and mean velocities, the factor Phi 4/3 (1.899547627) generates the mean planetary distances while the square root of the latter generates the mean distances throughout, i.e., including intermediate the synodic positions,

Moreover, and in like manner, while the mean periods and mean distances increase with each successive revolution, the all-inclusive mean velocities and planetary mean velocities correspondingly decrease by Phi to the minus two-thirds and phi to the minus one-third respectively, i.e., the velocity constants are:

Lastly, such is the nature of the equiangular spirals under consideration that the inverse and normal spirals are virtually identical to each other (with minor reservations, i.e., the matters of phase and origin referred to in the previous section). Nevertheless, apart from the latter points, equiangular spirals based on relations 6e and 6d are (for present practical purposes) interchangeable with those based on the diminishing velocities of relations 6c and 6d.

Relations 6e and 6f. The Inverse Velocity Constants

By now the reader has no doubt already recognized that six of the equiangular spirals based on the constants in relations 5a, 5b, 6a, 6b, 6e and 6d are those applied above to Ammonites, Land, and Sea shells. These six spirals also represent the majority of the Pheidan planorbidae shown in Figure 2, and for the range in question, i.e., from the inverse velocity spiral Phi 1/3 out as far as Phi 3, only Phi 5/3 is missing below Spira Solaris, while the remainder extend sequentially beyond the latter, i.e., Phi 7/3, Phi 8/3 and Phi 9/3. But what do velocities have to do with the present discussion concerning the spiral formation evident in shells? Here it is perhaps helpful to give Sir D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson's description of this aspect in On Growth and Form: (1917) where it is included in the latter's detailed description of the equiangular spiral: 35

[redeye]

I missed this thread and I'm so glad I found it. Brilliant graph JL, thank you for posting it.

Cheers!