Miles Mathis

[StevenO]

Push on a piece of matter, and it will push back... that is purely ES.

Nope, it is the force needed to change the gyroscopic spins of the particles that make up matter. It is neither gravity nor E/M. I think "inertia" labels it quite well.

[webolife]

Hey StevenO, I actually agree with you here. Although it may be a question of which is the cause and which the effect, I actually see ES [I didn't say EM!] this way as well. But the topic of gyroscopic force hasn't been brought up much here, although JL probably is thinking of this whenever he mentions spin... I am.

[StevenO]

Here is my review of Miles Mathis' book on Amazon. Just publishing it here as a backup in case they do not accept it....

Miles Mathis - The Un-unified Field

book review

- Have you ever wondered why contemporary physics seems to be such an impenetrable abstract jungle?
- Have you ever wondered why the math department has overtaken the physics department?
- Have you ever wondered how physicists have the audicity to claim they are able to calculate the conditions of the universe 14 Billion years ago, while at the same time they cannot even explain why we have two tides a day, why the moon and sun have the same optical size or why the planets are tilted? Or cannot even mechanically explain a simple property like "mass"?
- But were you afraid to ask for fear of being branded "mathematically illiterate"?

Help is on its way...Miles Mathis has published his first book and hopefully many will follow. It will take more than one book to clean up centuries of mathematics and physics theory mess-ups swept under the carpet. This one however provides a fine start.

Miles Mathis does a wonderful job of explaining how well known physical enigmas can be strictly mechanically explained as a result of a combined gravity-E/M field. A field that was already discovered by Newton and Coulomb but was misinterpreted by them as separate gravity and electrostatic fields. First Mathis shows how they are actually two combined fields joined through matter. Then he goes on to explain how the field can replace current mathematical smokescreens and many unexplained riddles by straightforward mechanical explanations. He even goes on to put a mechanical footing under the most mathematically obscured physics theories like Einsteins Field Equations, Quantum Electrodynamics and Quantum Chromodynamics.

To wrap it up: IMHO the most lucid scientific mind I've ever seen, now in paperback. A modern day polymath on its way to history as a new Leonardo.

[JohnMalone]

A well-written, wonderful review. Very encouraging.

[Jarvamundo]

Sorry to drag up old posts, as having just made my way through this fantastic thread.

Before i click away to buy the MM book, i thought i'd just pass this on.

Another "MAD" thought (experiment):

If we could produce very high frquency , high potential, Tesla scalar electricity and apply it to a Birkeland Terella enclosed in a perfect vacuum.

Also, be able to precisely measure the input energy of the generator, and precisely calculate any diminishment in the Teralla sphere and enclosure matter, thereafter to deduct it from observed and measured results

THEN I propose ....more magic matter (initially plasma ) and energy "appearing from nothing" ,would be created from the absolute vacuum!

Seems you want to repeat the Dollard 'cosmic super imposition' experiment. In this two 'superimposed' mono-polar longitudinal ("it's not scalar dummy") fields are superimposed, within a meeting point or 'channel' between or in the two fields, a vacuum tube is positioned, the synthesis 'of matter it'self' was noted by Dollard, often resulting in the tube shattering.

Furthering the experiment with Terella style variations would be interesting, although it seems probing ES in the manner suggested has been done (by Tesla), and re-done (by Dollard). Must admit, having enjoyed Meyls works, i'm still familiarizing myself with Dollard's works of the electric wave quadrature and related engineering to further understand the apparatus. This and other experiments, with accompanying videos and energetic_forum threads, have been talked about in the Pulsed Power thread of JL/Solar in NIAMA.

Just an FYI, bravo all for this thought provoking discussion.

[Corpuscles]

Seems you want to repeat the Dollard 'cosmic super imposition' experiment. In this two 'superimposed' mono-polar longitudinal ("it's not scalar dummy") fields are superimposed, within a meeting point or 'channel' between or in the two fields, a vacuum tube is positioned, the synthesis 'of matter it'self' was noted by Dollard, often resulting in the tube shattering.

.

Thanks for that , I am flattered that you bring it up. Without wishing to take this thread off topic: Thanks to JL and others here, I have started ploughing through Dollard stuff and am staggered that many of my 'thoughts' arising from studing Tesla, Dollard has already (years ago) actually experimentally proven. Sad part is very few seem to grasp the significance. (Yes, OK "scalar"technically is the incorrect term.

However I have only seen Dollard mention "a low pressure gas tube" rather than a pure vacuum. If you have link or material that says otherwise I would appreciate it. Maybe PM me, please?

----------------------------
Back to Miles Mathis

1. Can anyone who has the book already please describe whether there is more good stuff than is already on his website?

2. I highly recommend this article.
http://milesmathis.com/rain2.html
"Rainbows, Prisms, and non-edge Diffraction"

One of the most compelling arguments (indirectly) for his Unified field. I don't agree with or can't accept, all Miles says, but he is a bloody genius and well on the right track!! (Light years ahead of MS in his analytical lateral thinking). However I think he needs a practical partner capable of performing experiment to develop his theories, then he would have tools to refine them.

[Jarvamundo]

The video i've seen seems to contain low density gas bulbs, he does talk about several versions and sizes of the experiment across a range of his lectures, particular the L MWO video. He does specifically mention matter creation. I also seem to remember Tesla talking of 'creating and destroying' matter, could this be similar? Another experiment/device is the Farnsworth multipactor tube, another tube shattering wonder. Will be in touch.

Correct, it's lightly related to the discussions here.... but on that note... back to the brilliant Miles...

[StevenO]

Back to Miles Mathis

1. Can anyone who has the book already please describe whether there is more good stuff than is already on his website?

I was the first in the world to order the book and read all articles on his website several times, so I can compare. His book is a selection of articles from the website re-edited into a slightly less polemic style. So, if you want to save money no need to buy the book, but you could consider that a donation to the "starving artists" fund.

I don't agree with or can't accept, all Miles says, but he is a bloody genius and well on the right track!! (Light years ahead of MS in his analytical lateral thinking). However I think he needs a practical partner capable of performing experiment to develop his theories, then he would have tools to refine them.

I'm volunteering. But undeniable experiments are hard. There are already many ad-hoc explanations in the mainstream, so the walls are thick and high. However, I think there is an convincing entry through signal processing theory, which we are going to attack next month.

[jjohnson]

As the topic of gyroscopes has been brought up, and resonances have also been mentioned, let me offer this relay link to Dan Fitzpatrick's web site, which offers a lot of interesting, original thought of how things work, some of which might complement EU theory, and which offer some intriguing explanations of the linakge between the large and the micro scales of behaviors in the Universe. Here ya go, for his home page:
http://www.amperefitz.com/

[Corpuscles]

I'm volunteering. But undeniable experiments are hard. There are already many ad-hoc explanations in the mainstream, so the walls are thick and high. However, I think there is an convincing entry through signal processing theory, which we are going to attack next month.

That is excellent news! Steven. I have seen a few of your posts (here on TBolts) on the subject but it is far too specialised for me to understand , or follow.

As you know (you almost seem to know Mathis work "off by heart") Miles mentions so many experiments of the foregoing masters but with a profoundly different twist. So hopefully success or encouragement in next months exercise might inspire you to eventually replicate some of the basics and find a way to show the different perspective and the electrical basis (even if you are concentrating on the 'photon') for phenomena which has been previously been explained away in an other 'theory'. I honestly think actual experiment will add so much more 'clout' (impact) to Miles work.

GoodLuck!... maybe eventually, you could let us know how you fare?

[seasmith]

corpuscles wrote:

Can anyone who has the book already please describe whether there is more good stuff than is already on his website?

Just buy the dang book. Unlike an unsorted collection of articles, it's a Book; with direction and purpose.
Follow the evolution of his line of thought there, and if a chapter raises questions in your mind, then go to the website and search for related topics to fill in the gaps.

just my trivial opinion...

[StevenO]

Unexpected support for Miles' book on Amazon.co.uk:

Essential Reading

We need a revolution. We need scientits to climb out of their own behinds and start reading this. Even better - to start UNDERSTANDING this

We know next to nothing - contrary to Stephen Hawkings et al - and this is as near a fresh beginning as we will ever get

It may not happen in my or your lifetime but this needs to be standard knowledge. It needs to be on the syllabus.

Its the strongest and most coherent description of the physical and mathematical world around us and is written in plain english. Not ONCE does Miles hide behind esoteric and indecipherable maths. Everything you ever wanted or needed to know is put on a plate and explained clearly, methodically and understandably - but most importantly it is explained directly and mechanically and it all fits. Like a big warm glove

Boxes get ticked, things fall into place and start to make sense. Science jargon from "scientists" on TV and in print start Klaxxons in your head every time you hear or read them and you recognise these people are only blowing their own very complicated trumpets

Get this book. Read it. Again and again. You will know as soon as you do that he is correct

[StevenO]

New interesting article from Miles about dark matter and MOND:

How my Unified Field solves the Galactic Rotation Problem (and how the dark matter math is fudged)

[jjohnson]

Thanks, StevenO, for the notice. I've been bugging Miles to write his ideas on galactic rotation up, but he was busy with his book. Glad he's taken the time; will read it forthwith. I might add that, although he is always busy with his various pursuits, if you have something interesting to ask about that his theories might help cast some light on, he will work on it if he thinks it threads in.

He's a good guy, as idiosyncratic as most of us are in what and how he thinks. I was having trouble with Boltzmann's constant in my investigations into stellar spectra and asked him a couple of questions about it. In a month he had researched the history and turned the math inside out, found where errors in the units were made and wrote up a paper. Who else will do that now and then? He's an interesting theorist with an odd proclivity for real mechanical world pragmatism.

Regarding his book - Seasmith's review has it right. The hardbound volume is not that expensive, and the paperbacks and e-books even less so. It's about the price of one meal at a nice restaurant, maybe less. Being self-published, it's production run is indeterminate, and if it is suspended altogether, who knows, a copy might become rare. The Amazon review by mathPhd was unexpected and I bet Miles welcomed that.

Jim

[seasmith]

on
Charge Field Geometries

There’s been much back and forth in this thread about distinctions between electric “charge’ fields and gravitic ‘mass’ fields. Also between photonic particle and/or wave interference type effects. The reasoning has become circular, if not plane hyper-toroidal. Let me cast my bean in with Mathis and repeat here:

The electric motion-field of mass density, and the gravitic motion-field of mass volumes, are seamless inversions of effect.

http://thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpBB3/v ... 1&start=30

And let’s burn that strawman of the “fields” here, once and for all.
All ‘fields’ in physics imply Fields of Motion. In our present case, they are describing dx, dy, dz and dt vectors; plottable for Mathis’ ‘charge particles’ and-or Meyls’ ‘wave interference functions’ (or any particular ‘gravitons’ , ‘mass-bound’ etherons or whatever quanta one cares to conjure up). They are all fields or matrices of Motion.

So, IF charge carriers and gravity enablers work in inverse proportion to each other, and derive from the same space volume and density of ‘matter’, then we should be able to integrate their occurrences.
That suggests a type of circuit, or cycle. I’ve elsewheres referred to it as an “Aetheric Cycle/Circuit”, but call it what you would like.

Geometricly visualized, there is a quadratic progression that we might signify with Gravity > Light > Matter > Aether (in whatever order). Or, as the Platonic~ Water, Air, Earth and Fire.
Schwaller might use something like Becoming, Being, Progression and Return.

This assumed quadratic form would function, as per Fuller and Mathis, as a vectoral “squaring of the circle”.
On a purely mechanical scale, it accounts for the y, y, z and t orthogonal motions in our field of ‘existence’.
[ Going liberal with the ellipses here because all of these terminologies can be debated (jl)].

What, one may ask, is the role of an aether in this cycle. Is it not quantifiable in physical properties or units ?
No, it would be the ‘t’ in Return. When our sub-circuit of local cause-and-effect~ taps in to the vast cosmic generating circuit. When being blinks in to non-being, and then being again. When matter is arced into thermal ‘energy’ and other stuff. What happened at Hiroshima.

But wait, there’s more. A physical sphere, what ever its gyroscopic motions and duration, has a Center.
The penultimate term of volumetric geometry. The fifth element. The non-existal locus of our local existal plane. Plato’s dodecahedral power source on a cosmic scale, inscribed in the sphere. Tesla’s fifth dimension?

Naturally, for every in there is an out. Perhaps the icosidodecahedron enveloping the sphere, integrating triangle and pentagram.
I think it was ’07 when we were discussing the crystalline structures of deep space and the
Hexagram of universal progressions.

'appy us labor day wknd,
s