The EM Universe

[Jehovajah]

http://my.opera.com/jehovajah/blog/2013 ... ing-to-the

My latest draft on the revision of EM theory. The transverse wave i have found out is only one particular mode of translation, and some very interesting longitudinal wave or so called scalar wave experiments are being done on youtube.

The vorticular dipole as a magnetic dipole seems the most logical basis for the construction of an electrostatic dipole in a dielectric, and the monopole electron is as much a myth as the monopole magnetron. A return to a dual fluid plasma model is not only called for it is in fact the theoretical model being used today under the guise of particle physics.

Thanks to Ed Leedskalnin who just pointed out the obvious. The emperor has no clothes!

[GaryN]

The optical rectification model for the production of powerful magnetic fields, terahertz pulses, and the most energetic cosmic rays by way of acceleration in a magneto pulsed wakefield plasma accelerator can explain much in cosmological terms, but the gamma ray energies required to 'fuel' the process remains the main puzzle. In the lab, the energies/frequencies needed to make it all work in a vacuum are not yet achievable, but if space is in fact a non-linear or quasi non-linear medium, then the energies available at the cosmic scales will most likely be available in the regions close to the extreme energy events now classes as black holes, magnetars, etc. Though these developments are mainly concerned with fusion applications, this long, detailed pdf could also be applied to cosmological processes.

From:
Optics in the relativistic regime
...

Looking into the future, one of the most intriguing ap-
plications of relativistic optics is producing an attosec-
ond laser with reasonable efficiency. This should lead to
the generation of pulses with much higher intensities
and confirm the unproven rule that the generation of
Mourou, Tajima, and Bulanov: Optics in the relativistic regime
higher intensities generally leads to shorter pulse dura-
tion. If we follow this rule, it suggests that in the next ten
years or so we shall be able to approach the Schwinger
intensity corresponding to 10^30 W / cm2 with pulse dura-
tion in the zeptosecond regime. In this case the new non-
linear medium will be just a vacuum. Immense technical
challenges in controlling the laser and optics lie ahead
for such tasks.

Also:
Generation of nanosecond terahertz pulses by the optical rectification method
http://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml ... n_lang=eng

So the only thing missing is the power source to drive it all. The Light of Creation, formed at a cosmic scale plasma pinch is looking good. To my mind anyway.

[GaryN]

Magnetic Shell

An infinitely thin double magnetic layer formed by magnetic dipoles. Under certain conditions the magnetic field of a magnetic shell is equivalent to the field of a direct current flowing along the contour of a shell. The equivalence between a magnetic shell and a closed linear current is used in electrotechnical calculations.

The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.



If Suns are formed at the pinch point in a flux tube, then electrons spiralling into that point will create an antenna, and the dipole field. When the current pinches, the flow is severely restricted, the pinch relaxes, and thus an oscillator is established. The shells are extremely strong mechanically, and the double layer is also capable of at least 50 GeV isolation between layers of the shell. As the oscillators, 4 of them in reality, are working in the microwave range, then wave mixing can create the energies within those shells to produce the ions of the 7 elements from hydrogen to iron, as photons from UV to hard Gamma energies can be produced by 4 wave, microwave mixing. Woe to anything though within the region of influence of the Sun if total phase conjugacy ever occurs within the mixer, bursting all those shells! Iron ion shower anyone? A nice Gamma ray tan?

Well, maybe I'm a little rusty in the EM NIAMI department, or perhaps not?

[GaryN]

I'll get back to my EM Sun model later, in which I will be doing away with most of the EM principles, and using an Aether description instead. The Magnetic field is Aether flow, while the electric field is Aether 'pressure', so the mechanisms leading to the creation of the matter surrounding the Sun, all the way out to the Oort cloud, and of the magnetic forces that control the orbits of the planets, and also the method of production of the planets and all other regular or irregular shaped objects out there, will be described in Aether 'disturbance' terms.

Just now though, I'd like to state again that (I believe) most of the objects that are referred to a stars are not stars, and explain why I believe this is so. Firstly, we can not see that even the nearest star is a star, there are no images that really show more than one pixel from the best instruments. The rest is some fancy mathematical footwork. To see Alpha Centauri as SOHO sees our Sun would require a lens or mirror 625Km in diameter, so that's not likely to happen any time soon. Next is the nature of the instruments being used, and the interpretation of what the instruments detect. Hubble is and always has been a military device. Sure they show some pretty artistic images now and again, but the main purpose is military, and it would only be a wild guess to try and figure out what they are really up to. Much of what we see by way of Hubble is only made possible by as yet still classified science and technology.
What astronomers are seeing is believed to be caused by thermal ionisation of elements in the atmospheres of stars. That was suggested by Meghnad Saha, and is still the basis of most of present day astronomy. It is quite possible though, and probable in my mind, that what is being detected is the transition level emissions of electrically ionised elements, which could actually be cool, or even supercooled. All the object out there will have ionospheres, and coronas, and all will no doubt have full or partial shells of neutral hydrogen, and the corresponding emissions.
A case in point are starspots.
http://www.theplasmaverse.com/images/re ... advert.jpg
A starspot is supposedly a cooler region, sometimes taking up most of the visible stars surface. If it is rather a region of different charge, and the subsequent emissions from whatever element is at some transition level, then it is again nothing to do with thermal ionisation on a hot surface. We know that from observation of just the close-in planets that their ionospheres can be very different, some with strong, well organised magnetic fields, some with no, or very disorganised magnetic fields, which leads to 'messy', sometimes spotty (for a distant observer) ionospheres. The same variation is also observed with what they believe to be stars, so from that perspective, they could just as well be planets.
I still think it most likely, as per Bahram Katirai, that what we see as spiral galaxies are actually solar systems much like our own, as the dust rings around our Sun would look like the rings seen, at certain wavelengths, around many galaxies.
http://i.space.com/images/i/000/016/202 ... 1332798670
The spiral arms may well be equivalent to our Suns ballerina skirt, and it is the instrumentation and subsequent processing that gives us the spirals seen in other galaxies.
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6080 ... -sheet.jpg
There are of course many variations in appearance, but the wavelengths being used are still very limited, due to the nature of the instruments being used, and without true multi-spectal imaging capabilities, we are going to have differences in appearance that confuse our understanding. If it is realised that these images are not from thermal ionisation, that will be a good beginning to a proper interpretation of what is out there.
As for the planets, the only laboratory experiments that can even remotely match the observed spherical, and other shapes, are from Coulomb crystal formation. Dusty plasma in a torus, as is demonstrated in Tokomak experiments, can create the shapes of many observed objects, including the ones for which astronomers are still scratching their heads over. All that needs doing is to scale up the model, and we know how many orders of magnitude we have at our disposal, lots.
To accept that the Solar system may have been formed very quickly, complete with all the planets and their moons just where they are now found may seem like a Grand NIAMI idea, but the initial energy of a newly formed pinch will be capable of such, by the formation of multiple tori and the creation, acceleration and Coulomb crystal formation within those tori.
The mechanism for the formation of the tori I'll leave for another time, but it is to do with the momentum of the Aether that is the longitudinal magnetic field in the core of a galactic scale flux tube. As with the ram pump, or your knocking water pipes when you shut a tap off quickly, a large shock wave is created. With the flux tube, the pinch shuts off the flow, and the momentum of the aether can not just be stopped, it must dissipate that energy in some way, and it does so by sending a shock wave through the stationary Aether around the pinch. The neutral sheet, the ballerina skirt, and influences that spread out as far as the Oort sphere, the limits of out 'little' universe are all due to this Aether/magnetic shocking and the subsequent electric and magnetic processes invoked, including the creation of all the oblects out to the Oort sphere limits within the linear flux tubes that we see as the spiral arms of other galaxies, but are really flux tubes stretching away from the vacinity of a Sun.
So , each of these distant Galaxies are really little Universes like our own, perhaps varying greatly in overall size, and having different appearances because of viewing angle and overall ionisation levels, but the principle is much the same, triggered by the Z-pinch.
http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/5097 ... -print.jpg
Gee, I think with a little more work, this could be a good arXiv submission.

[seasmith]

~
GaryN wrote:

matter surrounding the Sun, all the way out to the Oort cloud,...

Whatever Oort is...
but apparently there is something helio-centric out there, and i agree, any conceptions of heliospherics
& heliocentric effects Should consider the solar domain/galactic domain interface, to extend as far andto ∞encompass that volume.

s

[GaryN]

Hi s. I think the Hindu cosmology may hold much truth about the true nature of the Solar system and the Universe. Interesting that conventional science hold the solar system to be about 4.5 billion years old, while the Hindu texts say the Universe is renewed, by fire or water, every 4.3 billion years. However, from what I understand, the Hindu Universe has a definite size, which would be more akin to our Solar system extended out to the supposed Oort cloud. And these mini-universes were 'without number', as we see in the Hubble ultra-deep field survey images, where they seem to go on forever.
I think the game changer for me is the idea that the Aether is a non-linear medium, as it then explains many things, like the travel of EM energy in space, that I have been puzzling over, and now I'm trying to figure out how this might affect the work of Faraday and Maxwell and Gauss, and others . Hopefully, that will lead to being able to prove Einstein was just a plagiarising, snake-oil salesman, or, as I must also consider, a not-so-willing tool of the larger establishment. He did drop quite a few hints to that effect over the years, and perhaps it was Minkowski who was really the bigger fraud.

[seasmith]

G, IF (our) universe is 'holo-fractal', then it is self-same and near infinitely scaleable.
If galaxies have "halos" (google Hubble Halo), then perhaps solar systems have (Oort) baby halos.

I've blathered on ad nauseum on zi model of a parallel Aetheric Circuit/cycle, in other threads, so i won't bore you again here.




Matter... ...∞ ... ...Light

....... ∞ ... ...... ∞

...∞ ... ...Charge...... ∞

... ....∞ ... ... ...∞

.Aether... ...∞... ... Gravity


A/C

[GaryN]

If galaxies have "halos" (google Hubble Halo), then perhaps solar systems have (Oort) baby halos.

Or the galaxies ARE solar systems?

A spiral galaxy like our Milky Way recycles gas through the halo of gases that surround it.

This graphic compares how the gases flow around a galaxy with intense star formation versus one with a more moderate level of star formation, which allows for recycling of gases.

The billions of stars they see in Galaxies are really only billions of planets, moons, irregular shaped asteroid size bodies, lumps of rock, dust and 'gas'. Those are all produced in the spiral arms by the Coulomb crystal process, and are ejected eventually to, in the solar system case, populate the Oort region. There is only one star in these 'galaxies', that are really solar systems, just like we only have one Sun in our solar system.
When a Sun goes into a higher level of activity, it can create large amounts of matter, which is then formed into the Coulomb crystals, so the arms of the 'galaxies' are lit up with what are thought to be stars, but are really only 'lit up' because the UV from their Sun is ionising the (mostly hydrogen) around these objects, that UV then travelling through the non-linear Aether vacuum as a soliton, which the space based instruments, or Earths atmosphere, can bring into focus.

Also on visibility, to think that Saturn or its rings are visible at Earth by way of Sunlight reflecting off gas or dust, rocks etc, or even Saturn itself is rediculous. The accepted strength of Sunlight at Saturn is 1/100 of the level of light Earth receives, so what percentage could be reflected? Even with a 100 % reflection, the inverse square law would mean that our eyes could not possible detect that light, and the fact that they can not image any of the planets, with a regular camera, from the ISS, is confirmation to me, that other processes are involved. Uranus, on the limits of naked eye visibility, receives only 1/350 of the light hitting earth, has and an albedo of about 0.3, and an angular diameter of only 3.5 arc seconds, when the resolution limit of the eye is taken to be 1 arc minute. Yet it is visible to many people, which defies logic, and science.

G, IF (our) universe is 'holo-fractal', then it is self-same and near infinitely scaleable.

Yes, and at the smaller levels, it then makes it possible, IMO, that even the Electron may have its own 'moon', which in the mechanical Aether based model could provide answers to how, by way of simple mechanical analogies, attraction and repulsion occur. By accepting that the nucleus also spins, at some incredible rate, billions of trillions of revolutions per second, we can create the gravitational force, again by mechanical analogy. The reason why the electron does not fall into the nucleus, as well as the reason why the planets orbit the Sun as they do is also explained. Lorentz had a stationary Aether but I'd need an Aether that can flow, and form spirals around the spinning nucleus, or electron, so maybe I'm biting off more than I can chew here, but I seem to do that quite often!
Anyway, who's blathering on now?

[GaryN]

Hubble eyes a smoldering star

This new image, snapped by NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, shows the star HD 184738, also known as Campbell's hydrogen star. It is surrounded by plumes of reddish gas—the fiery red and orange hues are caused by glowing gases, including hydrogen and nitrogen.

HD 184738 is also very bright in the infrared part of the spectrum, and is surrounded by dust very similar to the material that the Earth formed from. The origin of this dust is uncertain.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2013-09-hubble-eye ... r.html#jCp

Maybe it is a young star, in the process of creating the dust, as do all stars, our Sun included, that will eventually be turned into planets that will orbit it? It's electric field may be so strong that tendrils are searching for an escape path?

[seasmith]

GaryN wrote:

As capacitor/condenser charge is concentrated, or as transformer charge is differentiated,
over time.
-s

The energy for dissipation in my model is from a release of magneto-dielectric energies stored in a 'torqued' Aether. The tension in the flux tube (the Universe is a Tensegrity structure in my book)
-GaryN

I agree with the B. Fuller Tensegrity model, and of course
the Aetheric Circuit structure.
-s

at the Aether scale, to what I am feeling. I'm not even sure what I am looking for, but think I'll know it when I see it. Some of it is leading back to Poynting in 1909, right now I'm looking at phase-locked spin-torque oscillators...

G, I'm somewhat familiar with magnetic 'spin-valves' and nano-antennae effects
http://mappingignorance.org/2013/02/11/ ... oantennas/
and i apologize for the slow respond, but meant to ask you,
what is the driving "oscillator" here ?

http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpB ... 6&start=75

~

[GaryN]

and i apologize for the slow respond, but meant to ask you,
what is the driving "oscillator" here ?

I'll have to go back and see if I can pick up where I left off with my reasoning there, my response may also be slow!
Right now I'm confusing myself reading about self-focusing and defocusing of twisted light in non-linear media.

@me

Lorentz had a stationary Aether but I'd need an Aether that can flow,

Maybe I'll agree with Lorentz, for now, as the flow I was thinking of is probably only apparent, and is travelling waves in a stationary Aether.

[seasmith]

G,
"Twisted" light is old hat, this is the hattrick these days:



Radially Polarized

anostructured Holograms Control Light’s Intensity, Phase, Polarization
CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Aug. 21, 2013 — By combining cutting-edge nanotechnology with holograms, applied physicists at Harvard demonstrated a novel way for changing the intensity, phase and polarization of light rays.

The researchers at Harvard's School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) used the holograms to create an unusual state of light called a radially polarized beam. These beams, which span the visible and near-IR spectrum, are important for applications like high-resolution lithography as well as trapping and manipulating tiny particles like viruses. This is the first time a single, simple device has been designed to control the intensity, phase and polarization of light at once.


Left: holographic component fabricated by ion milling with a focused ion beam a 150-nm-thick gold film deposited on a glass substrate. A laser beam is partially transformed into a radially polarized beam as it traverses the device. The wide grooves create the donut-shaped intensity profile, known as a vortex, while the subwavelength nanometer grooves in the inset determine locally the radial polarization, which is perpendicular to the grooves. Right: The computed characteristic beam cross-section; the blue arrows indicate the radial polarization. Courtesy of Federico Capasso.

“Our lab works on using nanotechnology to play with light,” said SEAS research associate Patrice Genevet. “In this research, we’ve used holography in a novel way, incorporating cutting-edge nanotechnology in the form of subwavelength structures at a scale of just tens of nanometers.”

In recent years, Genevet and researchers in the laboratory of Federico Capasso, Robert L. Wallace Professor of Applied Physics and Vinton Hayes Senior Research Fellow in Electrical Engineering at SEAS, have focused on nanophotonics with the goal of creating new light beams and special effects that arise from the interaction of light with nanostructured materials.


Federico Capasso, the Robert L. Wallace Professor of Applied Physics and Vinton Hayes Senior Research Fellow in Electrical Engineering at Harvard SEAS. In his lab's latest research, they demonstrated that nanostructured holograms can be used to change the intensity, phase and polarization of light rays. Courtesy Harvard SEAS.

“When light is radially polarized, its electromagnetic vibrations oscillate inward and outward from the center of the beam like the spokes of a wheel,” Capasso said. “This unusual beam manifests itself as a very intense ring of light with a dark spot in the center.

“It is noteworthy that the same nanostructured holographic plate can be used to create radially polarized light at so many different wavelengths. Radially polarized light can be focused much more tightly than conventionally polarized light, thus enabling many potential applications in microscopy and nanoparticle manipulation.”

The new device resembles a normal hologram grating with an additional nanostructured pattern carved into it. Visible light interacts differently with apertures textured on the nanoscale than with those on the scale of microns or larger. By exploiting these behaviors, the modular interface can bend incoming light to adjust its intensity, phase and polarization.

The polarization effect that the new interface has on light could formerly only be achieved by a cascade of several different optical elements. “Now, you can control everything you need with just a single interface,” Genevet said. “We’re gaining a big advantage in terms of saving space.”

Genevet participated in a Photonics Media webinar in May, speaking on photonic metasurfaces.

For more information on this work, visit: http://www.seas.harvard.edu/capasso

Much more powerful concentration of energy exchange between matter and aether. Most probably at macro-scale it would blow a hole right through the densest magnetosphere...
~
http://photonics.com/Article.aspx?AID=54670

[GaryN]

Thanks s. I have read some about the fork gratings, as part of what I was looking into on the Shack-Hartmann science that Hubble employed. Much is still classified, but they must have known about this stuff for quite a while. It's the materials and nano-fabrication that is allowing the devices to be much smaller and cheaper.

[GaryN]

The Zodiacal light is supposedly the result of the Suns light reflected from silica crystals, down to nanometre size, that have been created by the collision of larger objects orbiting the Sun, over immense time frames, and gravitationally drawn into a dust disk or torus around the Sun. By accepting instead that the Sun creates matter, and that such matter is then formed into the disk by EM forces, and then arranged into larger crystals by chemical processes, may be much more reasonable. The Sun creates, amongst other elements, silicon and oxygen, which have, chemically, a natural liking for each other.

The ground beneath our feet started out as primarily Silicon and Oxygen provided by the Sun, and arranged and shaped by the Sun. The Sun is the Creator (and sometimes Destroyer) of worlds beyond number.
The atomic nuclei themselves can perhaps best be described by geometry, that of the Platonic Solids.
Sacred Solids in the Atomic Nucleus
http://sacred-geometry.es/en/content/sa ... ic-nucleus

[GaryN]

Researchers show how universe's violent youth seeded cosmos with iron

New evidence that iron is spread evenly between the galaxies in one of the largest galaxy clusters in the universe supports the theory that the universe underwent a turbulent and violent youth more than 10 billion years ago. That explosive period was responsible for seeding the cosmos with iron and other heavy elements that are critical to life itself.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2013-10-universe-v ... s.html#jCp

Our Sun puts out, by way of the solar wind, billions of tons of hydrogen ions every day. When a CME occurs, there are heavier ions, up to iron present. The explanation is that our Sun is not a first generation star, and that the iron came from a previous star that went supernova, spreading all the iron into the surrounding space. Then when our Sun coalesced from all the material from previous supernovas, it contained the iron already, and the other elements that show up in CMEs.
With a multilayer magnetic shell model, protons and neutrons within those shells are confined up to sufficient vibrational energy levels that the repulsive force is overcome, and the nuclei up to iron, in the inner shell, are forced into existence. As with a balloon, the internal pressure and the surface tension of the shell are highest with the smaller shells, so when the physical limits of confinement are exceeded, the resulting iron producing 'explosion' is the most energetic.
The outer shell being the weakest, hydrogen ions can permeate as through a porous membrane on a steady basis, creating the solar wind.
Looking at the periodic table, we can see the progression of the increase of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, H, He, C, Ne, O, Si, Fe. Carbon is a little special, as it requires the triple alpha resonance.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hb ... elfus.html
Rather than the 100 million Kelvin needing red giant stars, the 100 million has to be considered as a vibrational energy produced by the confinement within the magnetic shell, just as the vibrational level within a microwave oven will increase to a point of arc discharge if there is nothing in the oven to absorb the energy.
So, when a CME of sufficient magnitude occurs, the planets are in effect subject to a thin film deposition process, which is why the layering is seen on all planets and moons so far observed at sufficient resolution. Earth too, so the growing Earth model may be easily explained by thin films being deposited. This need not take billions of years, as each large CME may apply many layers at a time. Those thin films are then subject to the other EM forces such as EDM, inductive heating, etching, etc, to produce the igneous, and metamorphic materials, without resource to billions of years of pressure and temperature deep below the surface.