DNA Is Not Like a Computer Program

Has science taken a wrong turn? If so, what corrections are needed? Chronicles of scientific misbehavior. The role of heretic-pioneers and forbidden questions in the sciences. Is peer review working? The perverse "consensus of leading scientists." Good public relations versus good science.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: DNA Is Not Like a Computer Program

Post by junglelord » Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:57 am

Lloyd, Cancer can only matastasis due to what I just said....cellular microskeleton and its connections through the cell membrane to adheasion molecules, have to jitterbug, to allow the cell to metastisis, this has a direct influence on the nucleus, DNA and mutation. Case closed. The jitterbug causes gene mutation.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: DNA Is Not Like a Computer Program

Post by bboyer » Wed Jul 22, 2009 12:39 pm

There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

Lloyd
Posts: 4433
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:54 pm

Re: DNA Is Not Like a Computer Program

Post by Lloyd » Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:47 pm

GROWING ORGANS
* Here's a passage from a recent article by Dr. Mercola on advances in growing new organs instead of doing transplants.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/artic ... t-Age.aspx
Considering that every year 50,000 people die waiting for organ transplants, and every day 100,000 die from aging-related diseases and conditions, it would be nothing short of miraculous if we could replace virtually every organ in patients’ bodies with young pristine organs as they age.
Recently, steps toward achieving this goal have advanced greatly. For instance:
* An advanced tuberculosis patient successfully received a trachea transplant, using her own stem cells.
* Researchers from four European universities took a trachea from a deceased donor, removed its cells, leaving the extracellular structure, and re-seeded it with stem cells from her bone marrow and elsewhere.
* Scientists have brought a dead rat’s heart back to life by rebuilding it from a matrix, or a bare framework of tissue filled with young rat stem cells. They stripped the dead heart of its cells and used the remaining frame as the foundation for the new heart.
This is headed in the direction of providing a new source of "reconditioned" organs for transplant operations. After a week of being cultured in the laboratory, the cells started to beat in rhythm, and a few days later, the reconditioned heart actually began to pump blood.

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: DNA Is Not Like a Computer Program

Post by junglelord » Sat Jul 25, 2009 5:43 pm

Found a nice article on piezoelectric currents and the bodys fascial matrix by Tom Myers. Its clear that the fascial web transmits information with much more velocity then the nervous system. Thats why I always treat fascia. It is also why fascia control DNA. Fascia is a tensgrity matrix. Therefore Tensegrity controls DNA as I explained before, but it also controls cell activity and bone modeling. Consider bone and how it is created and destroyed via the response of gravity due to the millions of tiny crystals in the bone which function as diodes, millions of semiconductors, creating current that control osteoclasts to destroy bone, and osteoblast to lay down new bone. That is Piezoelectric properties of bone due to the tensegrity nature and the way it relates to gravity, to manipulate how bone is made, which is controlling DNA and cellular activity and structural modeling. Tensegrity and biology cannot be seperated. My view of anatomy is a Fuller view of anatomy. We're looking at: What does the whole system do that you can't predict just by looking at the individual parts?

Image
And how does it communicate? This is still under study, but the research points in three ways. Clearly, it communicates as a fabric; pull on one end and it pulls along the fabric to the other end. This is the story of the Anatomy Trains; it was the song Ida Rolf sang also. A pull in the leg – a muscle in spasm, or scar tissue from an injury – can communicate along the fascial fabric to become a pull in the neck. Vice versa works as well: a whiplash can end up lodging in the hips.

A second way of communicating through the fascia, illustrated a little in this picture, is via piezo-electricity. Deforming the liquid crystal of the fasciacauses ions to travel along the molecules, making a weak electric current. Cells respond to these current flows, illustrated upper left, and thus the pattern of the bone in the femur – as here, as a for instance – corresponds to the flows of piezo-electricity left by the person’s usage pattern.

This is much faster than the nervous system – 720 mph as opposed to the nervous system’s 160mph – but the kind of information transferable through this system is limited to tension and compression – i.e. mechanical information.

Very good design, that. It means that your femur is the lightest weight, strongest design for your pattern of movement, and my femur is specifically designed, via this simple mechanism, for my pattern of movement.

It’s pretty simple if you have two kinds of cells, with one commandment each: The osteoblasts are sent forth with but one commandment: make bone anywhere under the periosteum (the cling-wrap plastic coating around the bone). And they go and do that.

The osteoclasts, little bone Pac-men are sent out with but one commandment also: of the bone that is not peizo-electrically charged, of that thou mayest eat. The bone that is piezo-electrically charged, thou mayest not eat. In this way, bone is constantly renewed, but always in the most efficient manner.
http://www.anatomytrains.com/explore/ga ... 162?page=7
http://www.anatomytrains.com/explore/tensegrity
Toms blog on human dissection of the Anatomy Trains and the response of tissue when tensegrity is removed, ie the web is cut....the scar disappears!
These are the Anatomy Trains myofascial meridians we took from ‘George’ over the last six days. To my students: can you identify them?

For you others, these abstracted shapes are an unfamiliar way of seeing the body in motion / stability. From the left: Superficial Front Arm Line, Deep Front Arm Line, Superficial Front Line, Deep Front Line, Superficial Back Line, a bit of the upper posterior Spiral Line, the Back Functional Line, the Deep Back Arm Line, and the Superficial Back Arm Line.

Not shown (viva 2011!): Lateral Line, full Spiral Line, Front Functional Line, and the (new to the 2nd edition) Ipsilateral Functional Line.

——

One final note: I have an arse-kicking moment in every one of these dissections; most people do - it’s just too out of the normal realm and confrontive not to. Although I certainly felt like a proud father to see the concept laid out so concretely on the concrete floor of the lab, my mental sock drawer was rearranged by:

(Isaac Asimov says most scientific discoveries are not acccompanied by the equivalent of Archimedes’ “Eureka!” but a quiter, “That’s funny…”.)

I was taking a postage-stamp-sized window out of the leg’s interosseous membrane to examine under Eric’s microscope. Before I could even get it out of the leg it turned into gossamer, curled up and shrunk and went all wispy. We put it on the slide, and were able to roll it out a little, but this was true all over the body. We took a scar from George’s leg, but by the time Eric had tomed it for the microscope, it had disappeared, reorganized out of being a scar.

Conclusion (these conclusions to spiritual events are always banal, but here it is): Structure is contextual, and only contextual.

The scar is only a scar when it is in its milieu of forces around it. The interosseous membrane is not the sturdy fabric we see in Clemente unless it is strung between the two bones. Long live biotensegrity, and thank you Dr. Stephen Levine, and Tom Flemons, and Phil Earnhardt for sticking to your guns. I have a new appreciation for bones after this and their role in shaping the tissues. But a strong new appreciationfro the whole, the pattern in its entirety, and its malleability in consciousness, so thanks to Ida for sticking to her guns also, and what the hell, thanks to me for sticking to mine.

But this week, thanks to Todd, David, Eric, and all the other students who supported our work with theirs.

http://www.anatomytrains.com/blogs/tom-myers

http://www.anatomytrains.com/explore/ga ... how/id/164
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

333333333
Guest

Re: DNA Is Not Like a Computer Program

Post by 333333333 » Tue Jul 28, 2009 11:12 am

That is Piezoelectric properties of bone due to the tensegrity nature and the way it relates to gravity, to manipulate how bone is made, which is controlling DNA and cellular activity and structural modeling. Tensegrity and biology cannot be seperated.
WATER IN A CELL IS ABLE TO DETECT FREQUENCIES IN GRAVITATIONAL FIELD. DOES WATER SERVE AS A MEDIUM WHICH TRANSLATES THE CHANGES IN GRAVITY FREQUENCIES INTO EM FREQUENCIES?
Furthermore, it is my understanding that piezoelectricity can be reversed (so a strain can be created by applying electric field.
Also, is there a connection between applying manual stress to the fascia and which in turn leads to manipulation of qi energy in human body????
Tensegrity defies (manipulates) gravity
Consciousness defies (manipulates) gravity
Structure manipulates gravity
Gravity is created by eather
Eather is manipulated by thoughts, emotions (consciousness), geometry (geometric shapes), sound, movement, rotation
What is the structure of emotion? Especially emotion of love? Could emotions called unconditional love serves as medium (or a super conductor) that explains telepathy?

;) PEACE

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests