J.C. Maxwell's original set of dynamic ether equations

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: bboyer, MGmirkin

Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:38 am

J.C. Maxwell's original set of dynamic ether equations

Unread post by Sandokhan » Thu Apr 05, 2018 10:18 am

"The principle of the constancy of the velocity of light is of course contained in Maxwell's equations”

A. Einstein, 1905

Here are the censored Heaviside-Lorentz equations, USED BY EINSTEIN to justify his erronous claim regarding the speed of light:

http://www.irregularwebcomic.net/annota ... t1420a.gif

Here is the original set of J.C. Maxwell's equations:


The original Maxwell dynamics equations ARE INVARIANT UNDER GALILEAN TRANSFORMATIONS:

http://www.omicsonline.com/open-access/ ... 000198.pdf

More information here:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg1918701 (five consecutive messages)

The original equations can also be written in quaternion form: the scalar part represents the POTENTIAL, while the vector part describes the FIELD.

From an advanced mathematical point of view, the censored Heaviside-Lorentz equations operate under the U(1) group of transformations, while the correct dynamic equations can only be described by the SU(2) group of transformations.

Fields can be described by a U(1) group transformation: the modified Maxwell equations (actually, the Heaviside-Lorentz equations).

Potentials (ether theory) can ONLY be described by SU(2) group transformations (and higher).

The group algebra underlying the commonly used Maxwell equations is U(1): but this only relates to the ripples in the sea of ether.

The Sagnac effect, the Aharonov-Bohm effect, the Maxwell-Lodge effect can only be described by SU(2) group transformations (the quaternion formulation of the Maxwell equations).

Quaternionic algebra is described by the SU(2) group of transformations, and vector algebra by the U(1) group of transformations.

This original set of equations = ELECTROGRAVITY.

The electrogravitational particle is the boson (Kaluza-Klein particle).

Here is the correct model of the etheric atom:


A proton is made up of NINE laevorotatory subquarks - an electron is actually comprised of NINE dextrorotatory subquarks (called now preons).

However, modern science has mistakenly named a SINGLE dextrorotatory subquark as an electron and has ascribed THE TOTAL charge of the NINE corresponding subquarks as the total negative charge of a single electron, thus confusing the whole matter.


A proton is further subdivided into baryons, the first state of ether.


The further subdivions occurs at the level of mesons, each consisting of six subquarks, the second state of ether:


Then we reach the third state of ether, the quarks, each made up of three subquarks:


The fourth state of ether, are the subquarks/magnetic monopoles/gravitons themselves:



"The exact number of these bubbles included in an ultimate physical atom is not readily ascertainable, but several different lines of calculation agree in indicating it as closely approximating to the almost incredible total of fourteen thousand millions. Where figures are so huge direct counting is obviously impossible, but fortunately the different parts of the atom are sufficiently alike to enable us to make an estimate whose margin of error is not likely to be very great."

A subquark is composed of strings of bosons and antibosons. A boson = a neutrino = a photon and does have mass.

Let us remember that in one extension to the Standard Model, left- and right-handed neutrinos exist. These Dirac neutrinos acquire mass via the Higgs mechanism but right-handed neutrinos interact much more weakly than any other particles.

Aspden calls the neutrino ‘a figment of the imagination invented in order to make the books balance’ and says that it simply denotes ‘the capacity of the aether to absorb energy and momentum’.

The particles that make up the magnetic field are subquarks (also called omegans, tachyons, preons).

A subquark (tachyon, anu, omegan) is made up of vortices which consist of bosons and antibosons (strings of bosons).

Ether (telluric currents) consists of double vortices of subquarks also; in a conductor, the atoms made up of subquarks will align themselves to let bosons pass from a subquark to another, that is, electricity.

An electric current brought to bear upon the Anu checks their proper motions, i.e., renders them slower; the Anu exposed to it arrange themselves in parallel lines, and in each line the heart-shaped depression receives the flow, which passes out through the apex into the depression of the next, and so on. The Anu always set themselves to the current. Fig. 4. In all the diagrams the heart-shaped body, exaggerated to show the depression caused by the inflow and the point caused by the outflow, is a single Anu.


The complete demolition of the failed/flawed/catastrophic Rutherford-Bohr atomic model:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg1830498

Scalar wave vs. normal e/m wave (explained in terms of subquarks)

A normal electromagnetic wave is made up of two scalar waves (telluric currents, subquark strings) which travel in double torsion fashion: one of them has a dextrorotatory spin, the other a laevorotatory spin.

Tesla injected signals/energy directly into such a scalar wave (longitudinal wave), which would travel through the normal radio wave (transversal wave) without causing any ripples in the sea of ether.

Modern wireless technology uses only hertzian waves, causing ripples in the sea of ether.

True wireless technology means to use only scalar waves, non-hertzian waves, to send signals.

This is the FALSE diagram used in modern textbooks on electromagnetism:


Dr. Robert H. Romer, former Editor of the American Journal of Physics, also chastised the diagram shown above, purporting to illustrate the transverse plane wave traveling through 3-space. In endnote 24 of his noteworthy editorial, Dr. Romer takes that diagram to task as follows:

"…that dreadful diagram purporting to show the electric and magnetic fields of a plane wave, as a function of position (and/or time?) that besmirch the pages of almost every introductory book. …it is a horrible diagram. 'Misleading' would be too kind a word; 'wrong' is more accurate." "…perhaps then, for historical interest, [we should] find out how that diagram came to contaminate our literature in the first place."

Ether = subquark strings travelling in double torsion fashion (one string is made up of dextrorotatory subquarks, the other string consists of laevorotatory subquarks)

http://www.selfhealgo.com/wp-content/up ... 00x165.jpg

A Hertzian wave is just a ripple in the sea of ether.

Ether = subquark strings = telluric currents

A telluric current is a transversal wave, through which flow/propagate longitudinal waves.

A non-Hertzian wave is just such a longitudinal wave, propagating through the transversal wave.

This is true wireless.

Tesla used exclusively non-Hertzian waves, and none of the Hertzian waves.

The speed of a radio wave is completely and absolutely linked to the density of aether in the atmosphere.

What is a radio wave? What is an electromagnetic wave?

In 1887, Heinrich Hertz announced that he had discovered electromagnetic
waves, an achievement at that time of no small imporl. In 1889, Nikola Tesla
attempted the reproduction of these Hertzian experiments. Conducted with
absolute exactness in his elegant South Fifth Avenue Laboratory, Tesla found
himself incapable of producing the reported effects. No means however applied
would produce the effects which Hertz claimed. Tesla began experimenting
with abrupt and powerful electric discharges, using oil filled mica
capacitors charged to very high potentials. He found it possible to explode thin
wires with these abrupt discharges. Dimly perceiving something of importance
in this experimental series, Tesla abandoned this experimental series, all the
while pondering the mystery and suspecting that Hertz had somehow mistakenly
associated electrostatic inductions or electrified shockwaves in air for true
electromagnetic waves.

In fact, Tesla visited Hertz and personally proved these
refined observations to Hertz who, being convinced that Tesla was correct,
was about to withdraw his thesis. Hertz was truly disappointed, and Tesla
greatly regretted having to go to such lengths with an esteemed academician in
order to prove a point.

Hertz made a collosal mistake: he created shock waves in air, not true electromagnetic waves, that is, just ripples in the sea of ether.

An electromagnetic wave is simply a ripple in the sea of ether waves: it consists of two scalar waves, which propagate in a double torsion motion.

Tesla kept the ripples in the ether sea (electromagnetic waves) to a minimum, while sending the entire signal/impulse ONLY through the laevorotatory ether scalar wave (sometimes going beyond the speed of light): it is exactly how he achieved his legendary and fantastic results, by NOT using the hertzian ripples in the ether waves.

A normal electromagnetic wave will produce a temporary ripple in the ether sea, the signal transmitted will travel at the speed of light, in the absence of a higher density of aether (medium) and ether waves.

Tesla upholds the startling theory formulated by him long ago, that the radio transmitters as now used, do not emit Hertz waves, as commonly believed, but waves of sound. He says that a Hertz wave would only be possible in a solid ether, but he has demonstrated already in 1897 that the ether is a gas, which can only transmit waves of sound; that is such as are propagated by alternate compressions and rarefactions of the medium in which transverse waves are absolutely impossible. Dr. Hertz, in his celebrated experiments, mistook sound waves for transverse waves and this illusion has been continually kept up by his followers, and has greatly retarded the development of the wireless art. As soon as the expert become convinced of this fact they will find a natural and simple explanation of all the puzzling phenomena of the so-called radio.

The original set of J.C. Maxwell's e/m ether equations show and prove that Tesla's discovery is true.

The speed of light is a variable and depends on the density of the aether (medium through which ether/scalar waves/telluric waves).

Tesla's scalar wave lightbulb:

https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-1 ... eb346e82-c
https://img.wonderhowto.com/img/05/24/6 ... .w1456.jpg

Hertz did not discover any kind of a transverse electromagnetic wave that exhibited a rapid alternation of electric fields along a fixed axis that radiated away from its point of origin at the speed of light and was detectable at great distances.

Tesla realized immediately that Hertz erroneously identified shock waves through the air as true e/m waves.

In 1897, Lord Kelvin visited New York and stopped at the Tesla laboratory where Tesla "entertained him with demonstrations in support of my wireless theory."

Suddenly [Kelvin] remarked with evident astonishment:

'Then you are not making use of Hertz waves?' ’Certainly not’, I replied, ’these are radiations.’... "I can never forget the magic change that came over the illustrious philosopher the moment he freed himself from that erroneous impression.

The skeptic who would not believe was suddenly transformed into the warmest of supporters. He parted from me not only truly convinced of the scientific soundness of the idea but strongly express his confidence in its success." N. Tesla

More information on the original set of Maxwell equations:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg1608815

Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:38 am

Re: J.C. Maxwell's original set of dynamic ether equations

Unread post by Sandokhan » Thu Apr 12, 2018 7:03 am


A single experiment can answer all of the questions any scientist might have about the universe (electricity, gravity, ether theory, and much more).

Two pulses of light are sent in opposite directions around a stationary circular loop of radius R.

When the interferometer system is rotated, one beam of light will slow with respect to the other beam of light.

The Sagnac effect is MILLIONS OF TIMES LARGER THAN the effect predicted by the special theory of relativity.

The Sagnac effect is far larger than the effect forecast by relativity theory.

STR has no possible function in explaining the Sagnac effect.

The Sagnac effect is a non-relativistic effect.

COMPARISON OF THE SAGNAC EFFECT WITH SPECIAL RELATIVITY, starts on page 7, calculations/formulas on page 8

http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/eb ... fLight.pdf

page 8

Because many investigators claim that the
Sagnac effect is made explicable by using the
Theory of Special Relativity, a comparison of
that theory with the actual test results is given
below. It will be shown that the effects
calculated under these two theories are of very
different orders of magnitude, and that
therefore the Special Theory is of no value in
trying to explain the effect.

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg1886058


(Dr. A.G. Kelly explains that the distances covered by the light beams are the same)

THE CORRECT SAGNAC FORMULA FEATURES THE LINEAR VELOCITY + THE RADIUS OF THE LOOP, the wrong formula will feature the area + the angular velocity:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg2023979

The Michelson-Gale experiment hoax:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg2024144 (ten consecutive messages)

Hammar experiment hoax:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg2031383

The Sagnac experiment CAN ONLY be described by the potential, SU(2) group of transformations, that is, by the ether:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg2039636 (topological considerations of the Sagnac effect II)

Michelson-Morley experiment hoax:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg2041450 (two consecutive messages)

Calculations performed for the LISA Space Antenna:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg1983786 (four consecutive messages, the orbital Sagnac is much larger than the rotational Sagnac, yet it is not being recorded/registered by the GPS satellites)

The French pair, Dufour & Prunier repeated the Sagnac test, thirty years after Sagnac had done it, and got the same result. They then did other very important variations on the original Sagnac experiments. They showed that the photographic record could be taken upon the spinning disc or from the fixed laboratory and that the result was the same:

http://www.conspiracyoflight.com/pdf/Du ... 942%29.pdf

The Sagnac effect also applies to straight line motion:

http://www.conspiracyoflight.com/Ives/H ... d_Path.pdf (famous H. Ives experiment: Light Signals Sent Around a Closed Path)

https://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0609/0609222.pdf (first experiment conducted by R. Wang)

https://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0609/0609202.pdf (second experiment carried out by R. Wang)

There have been several attempts to try to explain the Sagnac effect, either using STR, GTR or other field theories.

J.H. Field (STR, time dilation), R. Klauber (NTO, non-time orthogonal metric in spacetime), A. Tartaglia/M.L. Ruggiero/G. Rizzi (flat spacetime, Aharonov-Bohm effect), P. Maraner/J.P. Zendri (Minkowski spacetime, Aharonov-Bohm effect), S.J.G. Gift (GTR), M.F. Yagan (cumulative Doppler effect using STR), A.G. Kelly (universal relativity), A. Sfarti (STR), F. Amador (Evans field theory), F. Selleri (specific set of spacetime transformations which lead directly to MLET, Modified Lorentz Ether Theory).

These authors do not seem to understand that there is no such thing as the theory of relativity/spacetime continuum:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... #msg769750

Dr. Yuri Galaev ether drift experiments:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg1722791

M. Ruderfer experiment:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg1846721

User avatar
Posts: 366
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:30 am
Location: London, England

Re: J.C. Maxwell's original set of dynamic ether equations

Unread post by neilwilkes » Mon Jul 02, 2018 4:52 am

It is just a shame this is on such a nonsensical website - flat earth, forsooth.

As far as the Maxwell stuff goes, very accurate - Maxwell's original set of equations numbered 20.
Heaviside started the rot with his curtailment into what is 2 vector equations wi9th the variables unseparated rather than Maxwell's 20 equations in 20 variables.
Lorentz then went even further and by systematically regauging them he threw out the entire class that are not in equ7librium in their exchange with their active (vacuum) environment and revised the Maxwell-Heaviside equations to make them amenable to separation of variables & closed analytical solutions.

The web page giving the original Maxwell equations no longer seems to exist.
Server not found error
You will never get a man to understand something his salary depends on him not understanding.

Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:38 am

Re: J.C. Maxwell's original set of dynamic ether equations

Unread post by Sandokhan » Mon Jul 02, 2018 6:53 am

Original set of Maxwell's equations:


http://web.archive.org/web/200710060832 ... tombe4.pdf
(also includes the appendix called Maxwell's Minor Errors discussing the wrong minus sign in equation D)

E = vXB − ∂Α/dt +gradψ

In quaternion form:


Dynamical Maxwell equations:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg2058884

Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:38 am

Re: J.C. Maxwell's original set of dynamic ether equations

Unread post by Sandokhan » Thu May 30, 2019 12:45 am

Re: superluminal speed of gravity/light

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg1943468 (faster than light speed of gravity, four consecutive messages)

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg2168036 (superluminal speed of light, original Maxwell equations are invariant under galilean transformations, static vs dynamical form of the equations)

In the official chronology of history, Newton believed that there are TWO GRAVITATIONAL FORCES AT WORK:

1. Terrestrial gravity

2. Planetary/stellar gravity

Newton still thought that the planets and Sun were kept apart by 'some secret principle of unsociableness in the ethers of their vortices,' and that gravity was due to a circulating ether.

Isaac Newton speculated that gravity was caused by a flow of ether, or space, into celestial bodies. He discussed this theory in letters to Oldenburg, Halley, and Boyle.

And most definitely he thought that terrestrial gravity is a force of pressure:

“In attractions, I briefly demonstrate the thing after this manner. Suppose an obstacle is interposed to hinder the meeting of any two bodies A, B, attracting one the other: then if either body, as A, is more attracted towards the other body B, than that other body B is towards the first body A, the obstacle will be more strongly urged by the pressure of the body A than by the pressure of the body B, and therefore will not remain in equilibrium: but the stronger pressure will prevail, and will make the system of the two bodies, together with the obstacle, to move directly towards the parts on which B lies; and in free spaces, to go forwards in infinitum with a motion continually accelerated; which is absurd and contrary to the first law.”

the obstacle will be more strongly urged by the pressure of the body A

Newton's clear description again:

the obstacle will be more strongly urged by the pressure of the body A than by the pressure of the body B, and therefore will not remain in equilibrium: but the stronger pressure will prevail

https://books.google.ro/books?id=VW_CAg ... er&f=false

Right from the pages of the Principia.


Here is the easiest way to disprove attractive gravity, not to mention the official story told by mainstream science regarding the shape/orbit of the planets.

The position of the centre of gravity varies according to the shape of the object.

And, according to the official theory we do have an applied external force:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/0/f/3/ ... c3bfee.png

This is what modern science is assuming about the shape of the Earth (perfect ellipsoid/geoid):

http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesi ... ec_001.gif

http://www.shonscience.com/uploads/2/2/ ... 8_orig.gif

Each and every layer (official theory) - crust, mantle, outer/inner core - forms a perfect ellipsoid (again, if it did not, we would have a direct defiance/violation of the law of attractive gravitation).

Upon that sphere, we have the fifth and last layer, the lithosphere.

And here is where the problems begin for the RE.

Let us carefully calculate the effect/distribution of mass of the continents with respect to both hemispheres (northern and southern).

"The area of land in the northern hemisphere of the earth is to the area of land in the southern hemisphere as three is to one.

The mean weight of the land is two and three-quarter times heavier than that of water; assuming the depth of the seas in both hemispheres to be equal, the northern hemisphere up to sea level is heavier than the southern hemisphere, if judged by sea and land distribution; the earth masses above sea level are additional heavy loads - we include here all the mountains/hills.

But this unequal distribution of masses does not affect the position of the earth, as it does not place the northern hemisphere with its face to the sun. A “dead force” like gravitation could not keep the unequally loaded earth in equilibrium. Also, the seasonal distribution of ice and snow, shifting in a distillation process from one hemisphere to the other, should interfere with the equilibrium of the earth, but fails to do so."

The northern hemisphere has a greater mass than its southern counterpart.

The unequally loaded perfect oblate spheroid (first four layers) DEFIES the law of attractive gravity.

It should rotate with the northern hemisphere facing the sun.

At present, the RE has an unequal distribution of mass: the northern hemisphere has more mass than the southern hemisphere.

It is the unequal mass distribution of the hemispheres upon a perfect oblate spheroid which defies the law of attractive gravity.

Since the northern hemisphere has more mass than its southern counterpart, we have a clear and definite DEFIANCE of the law of attractive gravity.

For the Pangeea hypothesis the situation is even more disastrous for the heliocentrical theory.

If we take into account the shape and size of the supercontinent Pangea, such a concentration of land mass in just one place would have meant an EVEN GREATER unequal load upon the inner layers of the Earth. It would have gradually stopped the Earth from rotating around its own axis, and Pangea would have faced the Sun 24 hours a day. The rotating layers of iron/nickel would have come to a dead stop in some weeks.

Let us also remember that rotation/torsion has been eliminated by Newton from the full acceleration equation:


Newton put forth ONLY the radial component of the full acceleration equation, however there are three more terms involving rotation/torsion.

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg2033009

Once torsion comes into play (the DePalma effect), the universal law of gravitation is proven to be false:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... #msg753387


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests