Post
by john666 » Fri May 27, 2016 7:24 pm
There is a theory on the internet the the Moon is actually a hologram.
When I stumbled across this theory, I thought it was interesting how none of the proponents of Moon hologram theory didn't even consider the possibility that the Sun is a hologram.
If the Moon would be a hologram, it would be even more logical for the Sun to be a hologram, considering that the Moon appears much more solid then the Sun, any yet, none of these theoreticians mentioned this possibility.
Don't get me wrong, I don't believe that the Moon is a hologram, but the Sun, or more precisely the Sun disk could be something similar to that.
I think that these guys who are promulgating the Moon hologram theory, are Intelligence agents, who spread disinformation so as to shift our attention from the possibility of the Sun being a hologram(or something like it)
to the completely false idea of the Moon being a hologram.
Here are the facts:
1.When high up in the sky, the sun disk and the Moon are of the same size
2.They both get bigger as they approach the horizon
3.They both get redder as they approach the horizon
4.At the 45th parallel north, the sun disk movement across the sky during summer, is exactly the same as the Moon's movement across the sky during winter, and the other way around.
When I mentioned the fourth point before, some forum members tried to convince me that this is not so
but I know that's a lie because I live at the 45th parallel north.
It is so, and the corrupt astronomy has no way explaining that, so they lie about it.
So the logical conclusion is that either the Moon and the Sun were created at the same time by the same Intelligence so as to orbit the Earth, or that some Intelligence created the Moon in such a way that the Moon in turn creates the sun disk.
Meaning the sun disk is a creation of the Moon, in a similar way as the shadow is the creation of the object that throws the shadow.
That is only a rough analogy of course.
Another analogy would be that of a lens;
The Moon as a lens, starlight as light, and the sun disk as a light image.
The light of the sun disk could actually be a composite light of the various stars.
You might say that cannot be, the stars are to faint too produce such a glowing light.
But maybe the stars that we see during the night are actually behind a celestial screen of sorts, that reduces their light by a substantial amount.
The sky during the night is actually not black, but dark blue, meaning the sky is blue even during the night.
Maybe the celestial screen that protects the Earth from being burned by starlight, increases its density during the night, so that we see stars, that may actually be very close and very big, as nothing more but little points of light.
Outrageous ideas, I know, but keep in mind that if the Earth was orbiting the Sun, and at the same time rotating west east around its own axis, the sun disk would rise at due east and set at due west, and it would do that every single day of the year.
Anyone, any child could test this assertion of mine, with nothing more but a globe and a flashlight.
Whether you are in the more northern regions, or in the more southern regions wouldn't matter.
If you take a flashlight and direct it at lets say 60 degrees north, and then rotate the globe, you would see that if you were at 60 degrees north the sun disk would move from due east to due west, and move in such way as to be directly above you during noon.
In this same scenario, the more north the observer is, the more would the sun disk movement tilt towards the southern sky, and the reverse is true for the more southern observer.
BUT NO MATTER OF THAT THE SUN DISK WOULD ALWAYS RISE AT DUE EAST AND SET AT DUE WEST.
If one can not understand a geometry as simple as that one, one cannot even begin to understand the more complicated issues of TRUE ASTRONOMY.
