'Welease Wosetta!'
- starbiter
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:11 am
- Location: Antelope CA
- Contact:
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
You're no fun Viscount, You only want facts. Must be the LA/Dragnet connection.
Please continue!
Please continue!
I Ching #49 The Image
Fire in the lake: the image of REVOLUTION
Thus the superior man
Sets the calender in order
And makes the seasons clear
www.EU-geology.com
http://www.michaelsteinbacher.com
Fire in the lake: the image of REVOLUTION
Thus the superior man
Sets the calender in order
And makes the seasons clear
www.EU-geology.com
http://www.michaelsteinbacher.com
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
LOLstarbiter wrote:You're no fun Viscount, You only want facts. Must be the LA/Dragnet connection.
Please continue!
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
On that point, why these people continue allowing such nonsense to flourish such as "comets seeded the Earth's oceans" is absolutely ludicrous. There would have to have been cometary impacts that were like virtual raindrops hitting the earth, continually, for hundreds or thousands of years. And that raises the issue of the Earth's atmosphere--it would have to had pre-existed the cometary "seeding" period or no water would have accumulated on the surface.
- D_Archer
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:01 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
I think the worst is how they get the "ice" to look blue and white in those new pictures, people tend of water to be blue so it must be a sort of hypnosis to influence viewer perception. Is it only their bias doing this or is it maliceviscount aero wrote:On that point, why these people continue allowing such nonsense to flourish such as "comets seeded the Earth's oceans" is absolutely ludicrous. There would have to have been cometary impacts that were like virtual raindrops hitting the earth, continually, for hundreds or thousands of years. And that raises the issue of the Earth's atmosphere--it would have to had pre-existed the cometary "seeding" period or no water would have accumulated on the surface.
Regards,
Daniel
- Shoot Forth Thunder -
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
yesD_Archer wrote:I think the worst is how they get the "ice" to look blue and white in those new pictures, people tend of water to be blue so it must be a sort of hypnosis to influence viewer perception. Is it only their bias doing this or is it maliceviscount aero wrote:On that point, why these people continue allowing such nonsense to flourish such as "comets seeded the Earth's oceans" is absolutely ludicrous. There would have to have been cometary impacts that were like virtual raindrops hitting the earth, continually, for hundreds or thousands of years. And that raises the issue of the Earth's atmosphere--it would have to had pre-existed the cometary "seeding" period or no water would have accumulated on the surface.
Regards,
Daniel
- Metryq
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:31 am
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
No, it's ALICE.D_Archer wrote:I think the worst is how they get the "ice" to look blue and white in those new pictures, people tend of water to be blue so it must be a sort of hypnosis to influence viewer perception. Is it only their bias doing this or is it malice
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:49 am
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
Wow they are at it again.
http://www.space.com/29807-rubby-ducky- ... ne+Feed%29
http://www.space.com/29807-rubby-ducky- ... ne+Feed%29
two icy spheres with a diameter of about 0.6 miles (1 kilometer) travel toward one another. They collide at "bicycle" speeds, study team members said. Following this initial collision, the two spheres begin orbiting one another. After the smaller body has left traces of material on the larger, they separate. The smaller body returns within a day to re-impact the larger one.
Just sharing, this isn't even worthy of comment. Sometimes something so stupid shows up on space.com I have no choice but to share it as a shining example of ignorance.These slow mergers might represent the quiet, early phase of planet formation, before large bodies excited the system to disruptive velocities, supporting the idea that cometary nuclei are primordial remains of early agglomeration of small bodies
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
I agree. The statements are so buried in myopic thinking that it is not even necessary to rebut them here. "Space.com" says it all, too--a tabloid online. That they even seriously consider their ideas is not even funny. I don't know the word for it.Frantic wrote:Wow they are at it again.
http://www.space.com/29807-rubby-ducky- ... ne+Feed%29
two icy spheres with a diameter of about 0.6 miles (1 kilometer) travel toward one another. They collide at "bicycle" speeds, study team members said. Following this initial collision, the two spheres begin orbiting one another. After the smaller body has left traces of material on the larger, they separate. The smaller body returns within a day to re-impact the larger one.Just sharing, this isn't even worthy of comment. Sometimes something so stupid shows up on space.com I have no choice but to share it as a shining example of ignorance.These slow mergers might represent the quiet, early phase of planet formation, before large bodies excited the system to disruptive velocities, supporting the idea that cometary nuclei are primordial remains of early agglomeration of small bodies
- Metryq
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:31 am
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
Maybe we need a clever re-wording of the old adage about the man with a hammer—something like: "To the astrophysicist armed with only gravity, everything looks like a collision."viscount aero wrote:I don't know the word for it.
Visually, I think of mainstream astronomers as like those toy cars with a switch on the front that makes the car turn in a new direction when it bumps a wall. Only the mainstream astronomers have a broken switch. Bump-bump-bump...
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
Yes good idea. I like your illustration.... bump... bump.... bump.... I'll call them "gravitists."Metryq wrote:Maybe we need a clever re-wording of the old adage about the man with a hammer—something like: "To the astrophysicist armed with only gravity, everything looks like a collision."viscount aero wrote:I don't know the word for it.
Visually, I think of mainstream astronomers as like those toy cars with a switch on the front that makes the car turn in a new direction when it bumps a wall. Only the mainstream astronomers have a broken switch. Bump-bump-bump...
Of note is that gravitist types ask gravity to do things it will likely never do.
The scenario described about how the lobes of 67P coalesced at "bicycle speed" must then apply to all of the other lobed comets that have been photographed, too. This would require virtually non-existent sized bodies in the vast reaches of space to find each other and collide at walking speed--and then fuse somehow--to form a lobed comet body. They would rather fixate on that instead of thinking of other more viable ideas such as etching away/removal of the actual structure of the body.
- FS3
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:44 pm
- Location: Europe
- Contact:
No Thinking! Same ol' Stinking Sink'oles...
Lots of circular holes on 67P! But much more "holes" in their reasoning...
A non-exhaustive catalogue of depressions
sharing similar morphologies to those
unambiguously linked to jets in the
Seth and Ma'at regions.
Ask someone who is experienced in electric arc welding how those dammn 'oles occur! And then try to convince him that the 'oles in the material exist only because there were little waterpits below the surface - so the metal "collapsed".
And - they have even a name for it: "heterogeneities" - No, that's nothing you can cure with penecillin, but it sure hurts like a chronical illness:
Large heterogeneities in comet 67P as revealed by active pits from sinkhole collapse
"Bump" - The typical sound of a collapsing stinkhole over a collapsing theory.
Anyhow, all this looks "scientific" for sure - with lots of diagrams, statistics, nice pictures and even more booga-booga: "There must be ice somewhere"! (In icy-blue as it should look like water)
No thinking, but that same ol' stinking over sink'oles...
FS3
A non-exhaustive catalogue of depressions
sharing similar morphologies to those
unambiguously linked to jets in the
Seth and Ma'at regions.
Ask someone who is experienced in electric arc welding how those dammn 'oles occur! And then try to convince him that the 'oles in the material exist only because there were little waterpits below the surface - so the metal "collapsed".
And - they have even a name for it: "heterogeneities" - No, that's nothing you can cure with penecillin, but it sure hurts like a chronical illness:
Large heterogeneities in comet 67P as revealed by active pits from sinkhole collapse
"Bump" - The typical sound of a collapsing stinkhole over a collapsing theory.
Anyhow, all this looks "scientific" for sure - with lots of diagrams, statistics, nice pictures and even more booga-booga: "There must be ice somewhere"! (In icy-blue as it should look like water)
No thinking, but that same ol' stinking over sink'oles...
FS3
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:16 pm
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
I still say it never stayed on the comet.
The "scientist" says nothing worked and all they have was a touchdown sensor indicating impact only.
Even though he says he cannot confirm landing; the spokeswoman completely ignores him and states "Philae has landed..."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9zXD6qZtoE
"..best of luck with the anchors..."
The "scientist" says nothing worked and all they have was a touchdown sensor indicating impact only.
Even though he says he cannot confirm landing; the spokeswoman completely ignores him and states "Philae has landed..."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9zXD6qZtoE
"..best of luck with the anchors..."
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:49 am
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
Here is a link to the BBC article on the sinkholes :
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33354872
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33354872
Mission researchers have previously reported the so-called "goosebumps" on the comet. These 1-3m lumps and bumps may be the original icy building blocks that came together to form 67P more than 4.5 billion years ago.
"All the goosebumps we have observed on the comet – they are inside these pits," said Dr Vincent.
-
- Posts: 2815
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
Ashpits ?they are inside these pits," said Dr Vincent.
-
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 7:27 am
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
I just cannot, for the life of me, understand how after Stardust, Deep Impact, and now Rosetta, these scientists still think that there is any ice, anywhere, on comets. The idea is an artifact of a model that was conceptualized before we had any reliable observational evidence of comets, or an understanding of the spectrum they exist on with both asteroids and, most recently, planets.
Anyone with a pair of eyes can see that this a giant chunk of rock. It's a freaking rock! My wife, who knows virtually nothing about astronomy or physics, took one look at the photos from Rosetta and said "yeah...that's just a rock." Good lord, man...
Anyone with a pair of eyes can see that this a giant chunk of rock. It's a freaking rock! My wife, who knows virtually nothing about astronomy or physics, took one look at the photos from Rosetta and said "yeah...that's just a rock." Good lord, man...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests