Recovered: Iron Sun Theories

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Recovery in progress: Iron Sun Theories

Post by bboyer » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:23 pm

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 4:29 pm Post subject: Re: Iron Sun Theories Reply with quote
OP "Tzunamii"
Krackonis wrote:
As much as I would like to think we will ever know the true age of the earth, with the changes in isotope decay rates it's unlikely that we will ever know beyond "educated guesses".

I find it beneficial to go with relatively accepted timelines so that we all know what we are talking about for now.

Jurassic , Precambrian etc all have certain meanings that are useful in historic organization.
I dig what your saying. At least a common point of reference will make it easier for when they Do get a handle on it.
Krackonis wrote: All this reminds me of the interesting hypothesis that the Dark Ages and such which we're defined during the 13-14th centuries were in error and 600 years were added (or so) due to errors in judgement of some few historians. Interesting? Yes, True? Who knows.
There was an interesting documentary last year from James Cameron, Exodus Decoded.
They make a good argument imo in showing that the information to confirm the Old Testament story was Always there, but because it didn't line up with their perceived time line, it was overlooked.
HERE
It also supports Velikovsky's claims.
I wonder if Mr. Talbot has viewed it, and if so His thoughts.
(casts out the reel)
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Recovery in progress: Iron Sun Theories

Post by bboyer » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:25 pm

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:11 am Post subject: OFF: Exodus decoded Reply with quote
OP "biknewb"
Tzunamii wrote: There was an interesting documentary last year from James Cameron, Exodus Decoded.
They make a good argument imo in showing that the information to confirm the Old Testament story was Always there, but because it didn't line up with their perceived time line, it was overlooked.
HERE
It also supports Velikovsky's claims.
I wonder if Mr. Talbot has viewed it, and if so His thoughts.
(casts out the reel)
Thanks Tzunamii
That most certainly is a wonderful rearrangement of history. It can be seen on YouTube; search for Exodus Decoded. There is one complete video with horrible image quality and there are incomplete parts with better image. So it is kind of a puzzle, but well worth the effort.

This documentary solved one enigma I have been wondering about for a long time: how could only the first borns of Egypt be killed. What was to differentiate between firstborns and other chidren. It appears the firstborns enjoyed the privilege of sleeping in a bed at ground level, while the lesser members of the household slept on the rooftop.

According to this view the power behind the wonders surrounding the Exodus is a giant vulcanic eruption. But the EU has a lot more possibilities to offer...
regards
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Recovery in progress: Iron Sun Theories

Post by bboyer » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:26 pm

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:35 pm Post subject: Neutron Repulsion Reply with quote
OP "Michael Mozina"

It seems that the neutron's internal structure has been shown to be considerably more complex than once thought:

http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/ ... harge.html

It is very intriguing to note that the outer shell and inner core of the neutron has a negative charge. That is confirmation of a possible repulsive force that Dr. Oliver Manuel and his students have observed in the lab.

http://arxiv.org/ftp/nucl-th/papers/0511/0511051.pdf
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Recovery in progress: Iron Sun Theories

Post by bboyer » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:27 pm

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:08 pm Post subject: Re: Neutron Repulsion Reply with quote
OP "Mo"
Michael Mozina wrote: It seems that the neutron's internal structure has been shown to be considerably more complex than once thought:

http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/ ... harge.html
Evidence of a torroidal structure for the neutron. It looks like
everything is torroidal. I say that this torroidal structure is a
response to current, of some kind, flowing past the nucleus.
An induced response like eddy currents.

Mo
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Recovery in progress: Iron Sun Theories

Post by bboyer » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:30 pm

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:14 am Post subject: Re: Neutron Repulsion Reply with quote
OP "upriver"
Michael Mozina wrote: It seems that the neutron's internal structure has been shown to be considerably more complex than once thought:

http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/ ... harge.html

It is very intriguing to note that the outer shell and inner core of the neutron has a negative charge. That is confirmation of a possible repulsive force that Dr. Oliver Manuel and his students have observed in the lab.

http://arxiv.org/ftp/nucl-th/papers/0511/0511051.pdf
Michael, what do you think of the 2 neutral gas streams that come into our solar system?

The Galactic Environment of the Sun

http://www.americanscientist.org/templa ... 6iwvZykQ9e

I think they are a initial source of hydrogen/He/N/O in the solar system. The surface fusion adds to the metals. That way you dont need an internal source of hydrogen.
_________________
Ron Paul Forum.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/index.php

SOS Save Our Science.
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Recovery in progress: Iron Sun Theories

Post by bboyer » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:31 pm

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 11:07 am Post subject: Reply with quote
OP "Pluto"

Hello upriver

you said
I think they are a initial source of hydrogen/He/N/O in the solar system. The surface fusion adds to the metals. That way you dont need an internal source of hydrogen.
Where do you think the initial source came from?

or

is there an initial sorce if the universe is recycling.
_________________
Smile and live another day
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Recovery in progress: Iron Sun Theories

Post by bboyer » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:33 pm

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:50 pm Post subject: Re: Neutron Repulsion Reply with quote
OP "Michael Mozina"
Mo wrote:
Michael Mozina wrote: It seems that the neutron's internal structure has been shown to be considerably more complex than once thought:

http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/ ... harge.html
Evidence of a torroidal structure for the neutron. It looks like
everything is torroidal. I say that this torroidal structure is a
response to current, of some kind, flowing past the nucleus.
An induced response like eddy currents.

Mo
That seems likely to me as well.
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Recovery in progress: Iron Sun Theories

Post by bboyer » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:35 pm

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 5:07 pm Post subject: Re: Neutron Repulsion Reply with quote
OP "Michael Mozina"
upriver wrote:
Michael Mozina wrote: It seems that the neutron's internal structure has been shown to be considerably more complex than once thought:

http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/ ... harge.html

It is very intriguing to note that the outer shell and inner core of the neutron has a negative charge. That is confirmation of a possible repulsive force that Dr. Oliver Manuel and his students have observed in the lab.

http://arxiv.org/ftp/nucl-th/papers/0511/0511051.pdf
Michael, what do you think of the 2 neutral gas streams that come into our solar system?

The Galactic Environment of the Sun

http://www.americanscientist.org/templa ... 6iwvZykQ9e
Thanks for that link by the way.

IMO the sun is electrically interacting with the universe so I tend to doubt that these streams are actually neutral. I presume they carry the current into and through our solar system.
I think they are a initial source of hydrogen/He/N/O in the solar system. The surface fusion adds to the metals. That way you dont need an internal source of hydrogen.
I get the impression that hydrogen and helium tend to be "shed" by the sun's electrical processes. Powerful Z-pinches. like we might find in the coronal loops, tend to release neutrons is Los Alamos laboratory experiments. IMO those neutrons then decay into hydrogen atoms which are easily accelerated off the surface and into interstellar space. Helium is also light enough to flow with the solar wind, but other elements, particularly the heavy elements are not as easily accelerated off the surface and out of the sun's gravitational well. They tend to fall back to the sun as "coronal rain".
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Recovery in progress: Iron Sun Theories

Post by bboyer » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:38 pm

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 7:49 pm Post subject: Re: Neutron Repulsion Reply with quote
OP "upriver"
Michael Mozina wrote:
upriver wrote:
Michael Mozina wrote: It seems that the neutron's internal structure has been shown to be considerably more complex than once thought:

http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/ ... harge.html

It is very intriguing to note that the outer shell and inner core of the neutron has a negative charge. That is confirmation of a possible repulsive force that Dr. Oliver Manuel and his students have observed in the lab.

http://arxiv.org/ftp/nucl-th/papers/0511/0511051.pdf
Michael, what do you think of the 2 neutral gas streams that come into our solar system?

The Galactic Environment of the Sun
http://www.americanscientist.org/templa ... 6iwvZykQ9e
Thanks for that link by the way.

IMO the sun is electrically interacting with the universe so I tend to doubt that these streams are actually neutral. I presume they carry the current into and through our solar system.
I think they are a initial source of hydrogen/He/N/O in the solar system. The surface fusion adds to the metals. That way you dont need an internal source of hydrogen.
I get the impression that hydrogen and helium tend to be "shed" by the sun's electrical processes. Powerful Z-pinches. like we might find in the coronal loops, tend to release neutrons is Los Alamos laboratory experiments. IMO those neutrons then decay into hydrogen atoms which are easily accelerated off the surface and into interstellar space. Helium is also light enough to flow with the solar wind, but other elements, particularly the heavy elements are not as easily accelerated off the surface and out of the sun's gravitational well. They tend to fall back to the sun as "coronal rain".
Are the number of neutrons that are released from pinches, decay into a proton and electron, recombine into H, and get fused in another pinch into helium, sufficient to account for the solar wind?
I dont think so.

The solar wind is generated by 2 main processes.
One process, thermionic emission, releases electrons from the surface of the sun. These recombine with protons from ions to make H. Then there is neutral gas stream that comes from outside the heliosphere. It probably is surrounded by a "skin" of plasma due to Marklund convection making it similar to a Birkeland current but it doesnt have the attendant spiral magnetic field.
The neutral gas stream gas stream comes into play near the sun. There are impulsive inflows that reach the suns surface from the inner solar system. Simply put, hydrogen is made at the center of the galaxy in great quantities and flows out to the rest of the galaxy. The center of the galaxy also generates the electric current necessary to run the galaxy.

Part of the reason the heavy elements fall back to the surface is because of the amount that is vaporized at one time. There are iron ions in the solar wind. The iron that falls back onto the sun as coronal rain are actual blobs of vaporized iron.

I will try to explain my model a little more clearly.
_________________
Ron Paul Forum.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/index.php

SOS Save Our Science.
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Recovery in progress: Iron Sun Theories

Post by bboyer » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:47 pm

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 9:59 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
OP "Solar"

Just organizing some thoughts:
Michael Mozina wrote: The problem is that electric current, gravity wells, and magnetic fields tend to cause plasmas to separate. If there is any sort of plasma separation going on in the sun, then their "assumptions" are critically flawed, and therefore the composition issue is also flawed.
This simulated image and it's accompanying "running difference" has been my "Picture that won't go Away" in contrasting EU with the 'Sun has a Surface' model.
20050530-0548.jpg
(click to view larger image)

It's very difficult to explain the 'structural' features as they progress over time in any other way; and I've been trying to reason it out. I've been trying to figure out: If the sun is a ball of lightning/plasma without a surface then how is that so from a plasma perspective? It seems that if a ball of lightning were the case for our Sun then we would see a very powerful plasmoid with no encasement such as the jaw dropping and utterly magnificent Sag A* which lies at the center of the Milky Way (what black hole?). Sag A* is one of my all time favorite celestial features and to me looks to be a pure unrestricted plasmoid of immense proportions and power. A smaller scale version is what I sometimes consider to be at the center of the Sun.

Stratification is not a new thing insofar as plasmas are concerned as operative terms in relation to the dynamics of it's amorphous hierarchical characteristics would testify:

Hysteresis: a type of non-linear 'lag' as relates changes in multi connected systems.
Multifurcation: a type of hierarchical 'branching' of structures/systems
Adiabatic: 'lag' or 'lapse' rate at which the temperature of a fluid changes when subjected to changes in pressure.
Hydrostatic Stratification: which also deals with "fluids at rest or to the pressures they exert or transmit".
Thermal Stratification: "The formation of layers of different temperatures"
Chemical Stratification, Centrifugal Stratification and so on.

But there are also ideas of 'magnetic' stratification' to which I would add the prefix electro- always. This habit of using 'magnet' without citing it's electrical prefix should be outlawed across the scientific spectrum. In relation to the fact that electricity has a powerful impact on the dynamics of plasmas 'electromagnetic stratification' seems an important option when considering the layering of plasmas. Especially in light of the fact that...

"...the introduction of magnetic fields into a plasma makes a certain (not perfect but important) insulation of macroscopic field( or wave, or fluid) motion from microscopic particle (or kinetic) motion. This partial detachment of the fluid motion from the thermal energy is one of the main reasons why so many interesting phenomena in magnetized plasmas emerge..." - Plasma Astrophysics Tijima/Shibata

The above mentioned "insulation" seems to be that which conveys the 'self organizing' characteristic of plasmas. Which may also say a lot in relation to the thermal verses the accelerated aspects of the solar "wind". That this "wind" demonstrates acceleration qualities that are thermal but also those that are electrical would seem a testament to the above.

"This oscillation is centered around r = 0.99R⊙ with a width of about 0.03R⊙. This anomaly is composed of two parts: the first, below r = 0.99R⊙, is in phase with the solar cycle and has a maximal amplitude of about 10 km; the second part above r = 0.99R⊙, is in antiphase with the solar cycle and reaches larger amplitudes, of about 26km. These variations indicate the presence of a changing with the solar cycle of a physical structure that could be described as a very thin transition layer...

"...changes in the stratification with the inner layer (below 0.99R⊙) moving up during the increase of activity (compression) and the outer layer (above 0.99R⊙) moving down (relaxation). The precise localization of these layers isuncertain because have a characteristic width of about 0.005R⊙.
"" Changes in...stratification of the Sun

I find these oscillations interesting in relation to the z-pinch. Not that this is what causes the cycle. But as follows:

If a z-pinch produces a Sun or sphere then it would seem that at some point a state of relative equilibrium would be reached with so called 'dusty plasma' dampening the power of both the compressive affect with the expansive affect. This would seem to be a process that would not, once relative equilibrium had been reached, subsequently cease. It would also seem that a natural consequence of the process would produce an aggregate equipotential 'ring' and/or 'rings' of compressed matter/plasma. In other words z-pinch electromagnetically stratified 'shells' or layers' that could be 'insulated' from their thermal, pressure, and perhaps magneto-centrifugal equivalents.

In light of the "insulating" or "self organizing" characteristics of plasma via density, pressure, charge what have you - has, or was, consideration given to the idea that the stratification observed could be the result of double layers which can " separate regions of plasma with quite different characteristics."?

Sometimes, it seems, double layers are associated more with their dynamic explosive aspect more so than with their quite seperatrix nature. When it comes to stratification it would seem the later to be just as relevant. Your thoughts on that greatly appreciated as well.

That probably could have been much shorter but such is pondering.
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Recovery in progress: Iron Sun Theories

Post by bboyer » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:49 pm

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 8:38 am Post subject: Reply with quote
OP "Pluto"

Hello Michael

Looking at the link

http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/ ... harge.html

Knowing this complication and possible quarks forming the neutron.

Under what conditions would the Neutrons either merge or break down to quarks and make a quark compact matter.

I understand the limitations of Neutron compaction being the final compaction.

But! What if and under what conditions.

Does it need more heat, more strong forces, more gravity, more electromagnetic forces.

Than what stops it from going to the theoretical final preon particle( particles that make up all) compacted matter.

Its in the back of my head and unable to shake it.

I must be dense,,,,,, :)
_________________
Smile and live another day
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Recovery in progress: Iron Sun Theories

Post by bboyer » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:51 pm

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:28 am Post subject: Reply with quote
OP "biknewb"
Solar wrote: Just organizing some thoughts:
""...changes in the stratification with the inner layer (below 0.99R?) moving up during the increase of activity (compression) and the outer layer (above 0.99R?) moving down (relaxation). The precise localization of these layers isuncertain because have a characteristic width of about 0.005R?."" Changes in...stratification of the Sun
Solar, this description of layers closing in on each other when electrical stress rises, seems important to me. It resembles a double layer adapting to a changing environment.

And thanks for the link to the most extensive double layer page I have seen so far. :) with real equations :P
regards
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Recovery in progress: Iron Sun Theories

Post by bboyer » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:53 pm

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:42 pm Post subject: Re: Neutron Repulsion Reply with quote
OP "Michael Mozina"
upriver wrote: Are the number of neutrons that are released from pinches, decay into a proton and electron, recombine into H, and get fused in another pinch into helium, sufficient to account for the solar wind?
I dont think so.
Well, I didn't think so either at first, but ever since I looked at BBSO (Big Bear Solar Observatory) high resolution h-alpha images of the electrical activity all along the surface, my opinion has slowly changed over time.

http://web.hao.ucar.edu/~sgibson/wholes ... moid3.html

The large x-ray generating loops are the exception, not the rule. The rule is that "little" loops are created all along the whole surface and large loops are actually unusual only in their size (and energy state). I do think it's entirely possible that the sun's electrical process pinch out enough neutrons that eventually decay into hydrogen and account for a continuous thin hydrogen atmosphere. I also think those same z-pinch forces fuse hydrogen into helium, and Carbon into Nitrogen and Oxygen atoms as well, particularly in the big loops. That fusion process through solar atmosphere is generating free neutrons, and those will decay into hydrogen after about 10 minutes or so. Once you start accepting that fusion occurs in coronal loops (Tim even agreed with that concept over at the Baut forum if you recall), it becomes possible to explain the solar atmosphere in terms of an electrical process that fuses things together and pinches out neutrons from it's plasma atmosphere and from the solids that are turned into plasma from the surface erosion process. IMO the atmosphere of the sun has to "replenished" over time because it constantly sheds hydrogen and helium atoms. If these atoms weren't being replenished by the electrical activity, there wouldn't be enough hydrogen and helium in the atmosphere to account for the solar wind flow. Sooner or later you'd run out of hydrogen and helium in the atmosphere. I don't think that ever happens because the sun naturally creates hydrogen and helium as a part of it's "process".
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Recovery in progress: Iron Sun Theories

Post by bboyer » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:58 pm

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:05 am Post subject: Re: Neutron Repulsion Reply with quote
OP "upriver"
Michael Mozina wrote:
upriver wrote: Are the number of neutrons that are released from pinches, decay into a proton and electron, recombine into H, and get fused in another pinch into helium, sufficient to account for the solar wind?
I dont think so.
Well, I didn't think so either at first, but ever since I looked at BBSO (Big Bear Solar Observatory) high resolution h-alpha images of the electrical activity all along the surface, my opinion has slowly changed over time.

http://web.hao.ucar.edu/~sgibson/wholes ... moid3.html

The large x-ray generating loops are the exception, not the rule. The rule is that "little" loops are created all along the whole surface and large loops are actually unusual only in their size (and energy state). I do think it's entirely possible that the sun's electrical process pinch out enough neutrons that eventually decay into hydrogen and account for a continuous thin hydrogen atmosphere.
Including the neutrons that get captured?
I also think those same z-pinch forces fuse hydrogen into helium, and Carbon into Nitrogen and Oxygen atoms as well, particularly in the big loops.
Yes, I remember when I found that paper on observations of high radio temperatures. Then you wrote your paper with Oliver.

Remember the 2.2 MeV neutron capture observations on NASA's site?

That fusion process through solar atmosphere is generating free neutrons, and those will decay into hydrogen after about 10 minutes or so. Once you start accepting that fusion occurs in coronal loops (Tim even agreed with that concept over at the Baut forum if you recall), it becomes possible to explain the solar atmosphere in terms of an electrical process that fuses things together and pinches out neutrons from it's plasma atmosphere and from the solids that are turned into plasma from the surface erosion process.
I have always been a proponent of fusion in loops and footprints.
And you always need fusion fuel. In this case the PP chain and Deuterium.
I cant go with the idea that H diffuses through the iron surface from below.
You need initial H top get started. That H came from the galactic center no matter how you look at it. Unless you are into the big bang where the sun condensed out of primordial H. The H came from somewhere. The closest place is the center of the galaxy.

The other issue is that the coronal loops are most active at the equator.
Is there enough activity at the poles to account for the solar wind?
IMO the atmosphere of the sun has to "replenished" over time because it constantly sheds hydrogen and helium atoms. If these atoms weren't being replenished by the electrical activity, there wouldn't be enough hydrogen and helium in the atmosphere to account for the solar wind flow. Sooner or later you'd run out of hydrogen and helium in the atmosphere.
Yes, the solar atmosphere has to be replenished. That is the function of the neutral gas that flow into our solar system. When it gets near the sun it "inflows" to the solar surface to replenish the H. There is also O, N, C in this neutral stream.

SOHO solar probe reveals surprising gas near the Sun
ESA SCIENCE REPORT

Posted: November 21, 2001

"About 8000 inflow events have now been logged - most of them since 1998 while the Sun has been at its most active, as judged by the high count of sunspots. The inflows can start at an altitude of up to 2 700 000 kilometres above the visible surface, a distance equal to twice the Sun's diameter. Here the accelerating solar wind, leaving the Sun, has reached a speed of about 120 kilometres per second. Fighting against it, the gas clouds travel in at 50-100 kilometres per second. Typically they appear to come to rest about 700 000 kilometres out.

"I was stunned when I saw the first movies showing these inflows," says Bernhard Fleck, ESA's project scientist for the space mission. "Before this discovery by SOHO no one had any idea that gas could travel the wrong way, and be pushed back towards the Sun. Now we must learn from the inflows how the Sun regulates the magnetic fields carried by the solar wind, which are a key driver for the space weather we experience in the Earth's vicinity."
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0111/21sohogas/

So thats how the sun gets its surface fusion fuel.
I don't think that ever happens because the sun naturally creates hydrogen and helium as a part of it's "process".
That sounds like perpetual motion.

2 things are needed for the sun to function.

Electricity(electrons) and Fuel(Hydrogen)

In my extension of the EU, both of these items comes from the galactic center, as do stars it seems......
_________________
Ron Paul Forum.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/index.php

SOS Save Our Science.
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Recovery in progress: Iron Sun Theories

Post by bboyer » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:59 pm

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 7:44 am Post subject: Reply with quote
OP "Pluto"

Hello All
Upriver wrote: You need initial H top get started. That H came from the galactic center no matter how you look at it. Unless you are into the big bang where the sun condensed out of primordial H. The H came from somewhere. The closest place is the center of the galaxy.
If you think along the lines of recycling its always been here in one form or another.

The centre of the galaxy ejects matter degenerated and normal matter which in time spirals back to the centre.
_________________
Smile and live another day
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests