Human Body and Theory of Everything

[moses]

How do the negative thoughts and feelings come about ?
Unresolved traumatic experiences leave a lasting imprint
that can be triggered and the DNA will be pressured to
express it's genes exactly as it expressed them in the
actual trauma. Therefore healing requires lowering the
energy of the imprint to normal memory levels. Quieter
conditions are formed. No positive thinking required -
just correct psychotherapy.

DNA is affected by trauma, and these changes to gene
expression can be inherited. So all of humanity's DNA
could have been altered in a similar way in a global
cataclysm. We all might have the same genes turned off
that originally were turned on. How do we turn these
genes back on ? Can the same therapy that allows us
to lower the energy of the imprint be used to turn these
genes on ? Maybe.
Mo

[seasmith]

The secrets of intelligence lie within a single cell

New Scientist 26 April 2010 by Brian J. Ford

nravelling brain structure and function has come to mean understanding the interrelationship between neurons, rather than understanding the neurons themselves. My hunch is that the brain's power will turn out to derive from data processing within the neuron rather than activity between neurons. And networks of neurons enhance the effect of those neurons "thinking" between themselves. I think the neuron's action potentials are rather like a language neurons use to transmit processed data from one to the next.

Back in 2004, we set out to record these potentials, from neurons cultured in the lab. They emit electrical signals of around 40 hertz, which sound like a buzzing, irritating noise played back as audio files. I used some specialist software to distinguish the signal within the noise - and to produce sound from within each peak that is closer to the frequency of a human voice and therefore more revealing to the ear.

Listening to the results reprocessed at around 300 Hz, the audio files have the hypnotic quality of sea birds calling. There is a sense that each spike is modulated subtly within itself, and it sounds as if there are discrete signals in which one neuron in some sense "addresses" another. Could we be eavesdropping on the language of the brain?

For me, the brain is not a supercomputer in which the neurons are transistors; rather it is as if each individual neuron is itself a computer, and the brain a vast community of microscopic computers. But even this model is probably too simplistic since the neuron processes data flexibly and on disparate levels, and is therefore far superior to any digital system. If I am right, the human brain may be a trillion times more capable than we imagine, and "artificial intelligence" a grandiose misnomer.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2 ... tml?page=2

[Mr Bill Rattigan]

As above, so below.
Has anyone looked into the similarities between atoms and solar systems? I believe it became apparent some years ago that, on a basic levle an atom has very similar dynamics to our solar system and there is that saying “as above so below.” Have any findings in quantum mechanics or other provable experiments of electricity and mass, been able to illumine true science, so as to be able to apply these formula to solar proportions.
Science with out religion is materialism, and religion without science, is mere superstition. Food for thought. …Bill…

[Mr Bill Rattigan]

Our brain is the receiver from our higher consciousness, the universe, God. As earlier mentioned it is only us, our ego with all of its anxieties and fears that get in the way of the brains instructions( from our immune system that resides in the God consciousness) and its intended recipient. The message can become distorted and unclear, cancers is a prime example of this with cell growth out of control and wrong cell type for the area affected.
And another thing. True love is not what we may think it is. True love is being in the presence of, or the receiver of reciprocal (either true or imagined) feelings of love. This can be an absolute con, because what draws us to the being of affection, can be such a transient physical attribute, looks, intellect, wealth, but it gets us together to start the process. The person with whom we have feelings of love for, will change through time in almost every recognisable way, but the thing that stays the same in true love is the reciprocal nature of it. So, we don't love the person, their looks, their intellect or their money, so what is left, all that is left is love itself. If we did imagine that we loved looks intellect or money, than all of these things would change in the passage of time and we would be in love with material things and our cravings will be denied, which is a hiding to nothing. Wanting to be loved and having that need fulfilled is what we perceive to be and indeed is, true love. So true love is really not what it seems to be, but it is something more intense, more true and immortal. ...Bill...