He seems to be a quite extraordinary thinker and his technical ideas are compatible to what many have posted here these last few months. These are just tasters he has published as he's aware that his ideas are controversial and potentially dangerous.
To the Mods: I have asked this before, but did not receive a reply...is there a central archive or thread where we can store peoples' ideas, for future reference? There may possibly be very many scientific geniuses out there wishing to post their physics theories but are either in fear of doing so or know of no avenue in which to do so. I consider Thunderbolts to be cutting-edge and believe it would be most helpful to the originators of the EU theory to see how others are contributing or at least see which direction they are taking for mutual benefit (if they relate to the EU).
Anyway, I welcome all comments on this person's views, please.
If anybody knows how this person can pursue their ideas further, safely, with the possibility of further discussion at a senior level, I would welcome that information too. Thanks.
Thanks in advance.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by IA - November 2008
-----------------------------------
What is mass?
According to the "Golden Curvature Declination Model" of reality, mass is gyroscopic inertia. And that's as much as I will say for now.
Univea exist within and beyond themselves infinately, so all that CAN exist DOES. Infinate univea within (beneath this scale) and infinate univea beyond (above this scale). Beneath all quanta, another universe.
Our whole universe is a sub-quanta of the universe above this one.
The Big Bang revealed:-
15 Billion years is NOT a measure of the universes AGE, but rather of it's SIZE. That far back in linearity the universe, it's galaxies, stars, planets, molecules, atoms and quanta were 15 billion years SMALLER than at this point in our linearity. What they percieve as that smallest point is simply the farthest back in time that they can see. 15 billion years from now they will call this very moment a big bang. This is in accordance with my gravity model of curvture delination along the Golden Curve at the speed of light (on this scale).
Hawking himself has recently postulated a "pre-Big Bang period", but just won't make this last leap.
Ever expanding "spirality", NOT endlessly cycling "circularity".
Q: Ever-expanding from what? Is there a Singularity, even if it is smaller (or sooner) than previously suggested?
From the infinate univea beneath this one in scale.
At quick glance you appear to be Approaching "Golden Curvature Declination" theory but expressed in many dimensions whereas I deliberately limited it to two for the lay people to not just read it but understand it.
Velocity is a measure of how fast the space-time in front of me assimilates into the pattern of motion which I am.
If the spacetime in front of me (relative to a distant observer) cannot assimilate my pattern fast enough then I have exceeded C and just become a part of the universe that exists below this one in scale.
In the reciprocal:
If I can achieve absollute stillness (on this scale), which cannot be achieved physically (but can be aetherically) on this earth because of it's rotation and orbit then I have become part of the universe which exists above this one in scale.
The "almost-constant" C limit causes time dilation because the pattern of motion of which I am made is unraveling AT C along the Golden Curve while my whole pattern moves in monodirectional motion (on this scale). As my speed approaches C, the difference in speed between my own unraveling (C) and the speed of my monodirectional motion decreases. Thus to an observer? My time has appeared to dilate.
Gravity is the declination of curvature along the golden Curve at the speed of light.
Remember; It's "spacetime" that expands. Matter being part of spacetime, is therefore expanding also.
Areas of spacetime in disparate curvature would affect the qualities of matter that are already recognised in today's physics. They just won't put it all together.
186272m/s on THIS scale is not the same as 186272m/s one the scale above or the scale below. Univea (universes) exist within and beyond themselves infinately and so all that CAN exist DOES.
Not just an underlying realm. Infinite realms in all directions and dimensions and scales.
Q: And your definition of 'dimensions' is.....
Disparate curvature relative to other points in spatiality.
Q. Gravity is a radiated effect hence the limit of its radiation/effect are easily defined from the source of its radiation
Well, no offence but it seem less an explanation than a comment and label. The "Golden Curvature Declination Model" is an understandable explanation that works even for the lay people.
If pressed, However (as to radiated effect) I would point to the inverse square ratio of the distance between two events.
Clarification:
The "Golden Curvature Declination Model" is mine and no, I have not published it for fear of being hunted down and shot by TPTB.
There was no Big Bang or as hawking postulates a "pre-Big Bang" either. Were I to write it mathematically, the resultant equation would be the revelatory formula Verb mentions in his post. I don't believe TPTB is ready to just let that slide. But I believe If I give enough Lay type clues here, you giants will see the math behind it yourselves.
Here goes:
All reality is unraveling along the Golden Curve at 186272m/s (on this scale). This curvature declination means that the smallest of leptons in this moment are bigger than the whole universe was 15 billion years ago. In the reciprocal, follow any particular lepton in this moment for the next 15 billion years and said theoretical lepton will at that time be bigger than our universe is now and so most physicists, unable to percieve anything smaller than sub atomic quanta will believe that this moment (right now) must be a Big Bang. They will be as wrong about that as todays phisicists are.
A lay person might say that gravity is the earth expanding beneath my feet while I myself (feet and all) am expanding against it.
Picture two baloons inflated to a diameter of 10 centmeters and placed 10 centimeters apart. Now continue to inflate said baloons without moving them until they touch. From the perspective of the baloons, unaware of their increased inflation, they would percieve (had they conciouseness--and they do,LOL) that they had "gravitated" toward each other.
Or take a simple hydrogen atom. One electron orbiting one nucleus. According to the "Golden Curvature Declination Model" the curvature of both is in constant decline along the Golden Curve at C (on this Scale) while maintaining a distance between them that continues to be relative to their size. To an observer at a distance all is normal. BUT, If said observer focuses not on the extents of the particals but instead their central points, the observer is startled to see one point continually spiraling away from the other point.
No BiG Bang, just the illusion of it becuase of the inability to percieve/concieve the expanding univea benath the quanta.
Our own universe is but a sub-quanta of the universe above this one in scale.
The "Golden Curvature Declination Model" explains both gravity and the expansion of univea on all scales.
Also; I am not the first to have seen and understood this particular model, I think. I believe the ancients tried to demonstrate it in three dimensions at Giza when they built the pyramids. They expand in spatiality from tip to base along the Golden Curve.
--------------------------------------------------------------
