Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Has science taken a wrong turn? If so, what corrections are needed? Chronicles of scientific misbehavior. The role of heretic-pioneers and forbidden questions in the sciences. Is peer review working? The perverse "consensus of leading scientists." Good public relations versus good science.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
kevin
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:17 am

Re: Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Post by kevin » Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:42 pm

Sovereign,
I cannot find a copy of that photograph.
I suspect that the building blocks of matter will be outside our visual capabilities, but be part of this non hertzian phenonoma talked of in that link, basically information , and the information will be relevant to the geometry it is upon, therefore each element will form relative to the geometry that is there in the moment it forms, and is most commonly there in that point, hence the specific formations in tight regional areas, where specific elements or compounds only are found in that local area.
It will be one serious highway of information , but encoded in the geometry will be everything but mixed in different quantities relevant to the fractal geometry.
I can follow different flows, they are handed basically, with CW and CCW detectable spin charecteristics, but even more refinement is encoded than just that.
We tend to have saints these days, so we will call a church St this or that, in the past different gods were in my opinion this self same group of names to describe the various different flows of information, something is different about them all, and if I modulate to a specific one, I must be able to recognise it apart from all others and simply only detect that specific flow, because that is exactly what I can do, there must be a variation in the mix contained within those different flows.
I consider this is why there are formations of such as limestone along geographic areas, it is a result imo of the information most prevelent along the area where it forms, everything is one , but in subtle mixture it can become anything else, hence the alchemists philosiphors stone, everything can be turned to gold.
kevin

Sovereign
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 11:42 am

Re: Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Post by Sovereign » Sun Dec 28, 2008 2:06 pm

I'm not asking for a photograph, a simple MSPAINT or ASCII drawing of what you think it looks like is what I'm asking.

kevin
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:17 am

Re: Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Post by kevin » Sun Dec 28, 2008 2:20 pm

Sovereign,
What you ask for may fall under this banner,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSGVCEOjIlQ
That doesn't mean that it will be ultimately impossible, but We may need to learn how to travel between dimensions first, nothing is impossible.
The result is self evident, as everything you observe, but it's the old chicken and egg thing.
Kevin

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Post by junglelord » Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:26 pm

Sovereign wrote:Well I think I've read all of this thread finally and was wondering a couple things.
What does aether look like? And what does it's fundamental constituent look like?
The geometry of the 2 spin magnetic rotating field of the aether unit with its encapsulated 1/2 spin angular momentum
Image

Angular Momentum Photon
Image

Curved Constants
Image

Compton Function
Image

Spherical Electrostatic Charge & Toroid Electromagnetic Charge = e-
Image

The "Shape" of Aether doubleanalemma. Looking at the environment as Aether, and seeing the Aether as having a geometrical constant of 16pi2, the "shape" of spacetime can be determined. The rmfd constant gives the mathematical basis for the observation that time is curved. The rmfd constant is the constant that represents a quantum "particle" of the Aether. The dimensions of rmfd are equal to a unit of rotating magnetic field. The rmfd constant is equal to Coulomb's constant times 16pi2. 16pi2 is a geometrical constant, just as 4pi2 is the geometrical constant of a toroid, 4pi is the geometrical constant of a sphere, and 2pi is the geometrical constant of a circle. The 16pi2 geometrical constant looks like the double loxodrome image
Image

Structure of Space Time
Image

Quantum Resonance
Image

Quantum Spin
Image

Gforce
Image
Last edited by junglelord on Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:22 pm, edited 8 times in total.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

User avatar
Solar
Posts: 1372
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:05 am

Re: Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Post by Solar » Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:37 pm

A few thoughts there JL.
junglelord wrote: You now see the way the entire expression of light is slowly changing even in the public concept. Angular Momentum is the building block of all things via its relationship of aether. On its own, as in a photon, it is still the essential unit of measurement and understanding. This is what is common between matter and light is the angular momentum. You got it now Solar. Geometry is an integral part of reality and is a dimension.
The geometrical relationship was a result of contrasting Harold Aspden's "fluid crystal" analogy of Aether along with the "primary angular momentum" concept of APM. Aspden posits a perfect "phonon"-like "lattice" structure consisting of a "uniform background continuum of charge of one polarity permeated by a system of electrical charges of the opposite polarity". One then posits an 'influence' which disturbs it's equilibrium and it would seem that portions of this continuum, being a "crystal-like structure" would then further geometrize as it interacts via 'absorption', 'encapsulation', 'displacement', 'torque', 'torsion', 'compression' or which ever interaction one wants to qualify etc.

[/quote]This is the next step. You got all the parts now lets re-organize the SI Units via quantum constants. This series of quantum limits are the structural framework on which APM is built. This directly brings up the fact that Dimensions need to be re-organized. Mass is a dimension. Spherical Geometry is a Dimension. Just take it at face value as the right way to express the quantum domain.[/quote]

This "structural framework" concept reminds me of "The Plasma Crystal Experiment" wherein "...electrically charged dust particles arrange in a regular macroscopic crystal lattice." In contrast, these interpenetrating "domains" (could probably have used "dimensions" here) of "quantum constants" form the 'structural base' as opposed to microspheres in the Plasma Crystal Experiment.

It seems that this is where quaternion (A) and/or "scalar", "longitudinal" 'Potentials' come into play as forming a 'structural base' for which perturbations then induce further crystal geometrization of the 'lattices' within themselves, and in relation to each other, resulting in the production of 'form'. Considering this as such, it seems quite possible that in their undisturbed state as 'potentials', these quantum domains are already geometrically 'structured' internally. Such that the platonic forms are inherent. Perhaps upon perturbation and inter-reactions one gets further variety of geometric forms along with those geometries inherent within the quantum potentials(?).
APM has explained a unified field theory via what we already know by simple re- organization that could have been done by 1935, because the SI Units have the answers right there in Quantum Constants.
Would you care to elaborate, or have you already done so in another thread, on the significance of reorganizing SI units?
**********************************
Atoms are shimmering clouds of distributed charge of very defined geometry. They expand and contract and wave. They appear as both particle and wave, yet they are neither, they are simply distributed charge.
Superconductivity is heartily interesting in the way and manner it reveals "patterns" for the regions wherein the electromagnetic interactions occur. One can surely say that the effected regions bear geometrical properties. Here again an initial "lattice" of vortices reveal individual and aggregate morphologies that seem important to theories regarding the formation of galaxies but may also have implications to the quantum world as a "lattice" of potentials.

In the sense of a "Fractal Universe" these "shimmering clouds" of "distributed charge" remind me of the "galactic halos" that accompany their vortical structure. See "A Surprising Similarity Between Stars and Atoms".

This could possibly be the same with the "atoms" and "electrons" as a 'fractal domain' or "dimension" of activity as a particular fractal scale; as well as perhaps the size relationship between these two "particles" in relation to each other: In other words the realm of the "electron" and it's constituents could be an even further fractalization from the world of the "proton" and it's constituents. Coming together they would then produce the magnitudes larger fractal "domain of "atoms", then to "molecules' and onward:
From subatomic particles to superclusters of galaxies, nature has a nested hierarchical organization. There are also suggestive hints that self-similarity, the idea of similar form on different size scales, might be a fundamental property of the cosmological hierarchy. These features are the hallmarks of fractal structure. Could nature, as a whole, be a fractal system? - A Fractal Universe?
Several publications in the "Selected Papers" section of Robert L. Oldershaw's "Fractal Cosmology" make for interesting reading in this regard.

ES Charge must be quantified. EM charge is the gluon. The geometric relationship b/t these two distributed charges accounts for the Weak Force so that is not a force.

Such that the "weak force" governs an interpenetrating 'stratified layer/realm/domain/dimension' of activity scaled in the manner of the Fractal. Not layered like an onion but infinitely interpenetrating each other throughout and constituting infinite "space" forming Self-similar patterns of activity. But we can only measure and test so far into the "domains". Beyond them we assume other fractal "domains" don't exist because we wouldn't be able to perceive of them by those accustomed means.
**************************************

I understand the basics of your "Tensegrity" relationship in the form of helical 'Torsion', "charge": strain of displacement, 'Compression' of the 'sub-structural base' of ideal lattices of 'potentials' (quantum domains) and perhaps even with possible 'phase-transitions' as a possible 'relaxation' of the Torsion once some critical value is reached from perturbation of those latticed 'potentials'. "Phrase-transitions not simply in terms of different qualities of activity and formation of objects unique to a particular "domain"; but also with regard to perhaps the 'requirement' of "phase-transitions' into another entire and complete Self-similar interpenetrating Fractal 'strata'.

It seems overall, that to some extent, the "Aether" may be a general term used to incorporate all of these 'potentials' which can possibly be expressed as being infinite, like "space" without specific aggregate (geometric) 'forms' as are accustomed yet, having imperceptible 'structures' and 'forms' specific to those domains.

One could suppose that without some activity delimiting objects which simultaneously defines spacial relations (geometrization of areas/regions of the 'potentials') one would probably not be able to contrast "objects" in relation to "space": fractal areas/regions perceived of as "empty" because of imperceptible non-geometrized 'potentials', the quantum domains of the smallest "actions".

Though it is difficult to grasp "action" without something being "acted" upon perchance it has been an illusion of the senses coupled with the limitations of measuring techniques all along that qualify no other existing domains save those the senses could perceive in their aggregates appropriate for the perception thereof.

Now we find ourselves peering into the world of the super-small and gazing through telescopes towards the mega-large with no connectivity between the phases. The experience dictates otherwise; that their must exist a unifying principle and it may be the case. "Space", whatever it's nature could be crucial to understanding the connection since it is uniquely that within which all of them exist.

In the Fractal relation then, as the ultimate 'potential', it would seem that the quality called "charge" -/+ - in it's least possible quanta of action - could appear to be the result of a continuous 'quantum Tension' with "magnetism" possibly being a "restorative force" towards that original "symmetry" of a "uniform background charge continuum".
*********************************************
Ernshaw's Theorem says that one cannot have such an equally distributed charge structure, such as the APM's "aether unit" might suggest - if I understand it - owing to the square of the distance relationship. But he was reasoning from the point of view of charge "spaced within a true 'void'".
His theorem fails if they are immersed in a sea of electric charge: that background charge continuum that I assumed to be present in the aether. - H. Aspden
********************************************
The harmonic relationship of all charge is a platonic solid as it changes frequency, it goes from one geometric platonic solid to another. Now by this I mean that the Distributed Spherical Charge has harmonic nodes that appear as the frequency changes and when connected show themselves to be platonic solids. The way we generally see platonic solids is in the macro size in straight lines. This is not the quantum world. There are no straight lines in nature and this is true at the quantum level for sure. So imagine the lines that connect these harmonic nodes as traveling around the sphere of charge. No straight lines. Still a platonic solid.
I can "see" going from one geometric platonic solid to another" until the 'line', that isn't straight, starts 'moving' or "scanning an area".

Duh. I just realized that my guitar string, as it vibrates, does just that. One can get pure bell-like tones at the nodes while the antinodes, ideally, take the string around a volume of space. Why does that make the node seem like a "magnifying transmitter" for the transferring the string's momentum? Hmmm. So are you saying then that the "string" of APM which "scans an area" is delimiting the characteristic or quality we perceive of as 'Volume'?

When the Aether unit encapsulates the angular momentum and creates matter via tensegrity, the third component, Volume has a integrated relationship with that scanning circular string of Mass the creates Quantum Frequency. This 5 dimensional unit is important and simple to understand. I hope you can see why this would be. You must visualize the string scanning the aether unit, as in the diagrams. The concept is important and fits together like a hand in a glove. The SI Units reveal this all by themself.

It sounds ike you're saying that all of these aspects are in resonance as a Fractal existent with "quantum constants" acting like "magnifying transmitters" collectively forming what come to be called the "space-time continuum" i.e the totality of the fractal within which we find ourselves existing?

Or did I just take the Batmobile off-road again?

*turns on windshield wipers*
"Our laws of force tend to be applied in the Newtonian sense in that for every action there is an equal reaction, and yet, in the real world, where many-body gravitational effects or electrodynamic actions prevail, we do not have every action paired with an equal reaction." — Harold Aspden

altonhare
Posts: 1212
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:54 am
Location: Baltimore
Contact:

Re: Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Post by altonhare » Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:44 pm

Junglelord wrote:The geometry of the 2 spin magnetic rotating field of the aether unit with its encapsulated 1/2 spin angular momentum
How do the two balls stay together?

How do the loopy things stay stuck to the balls?

How does this object explain why light's motion does not depend on the motion of the source? How does it explain gravity?

Concentric cylinders of velocity squared? But velocity embodies motion and I see nothing moving in this photograph. Furthermore, how does this explain the two phenomena I mentioned?

Why does the little ball inside the toroid stay there? Are there spokes connecting it to the toroid that are not illustrated? How does it explain the two phenomena I mentioned?

A picture of angular momentum? But momentum embodies motion, also. I see no motion in this photograph.
Physicist: This is a pen

Mathematician: It's pi*r2*h

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Post by junglelord » Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:51 pm

Hi Solar
:D

Nice stuff.
:D

The Unified Field Theory directly results from the quantification of ES Charge and the understanding all charge is distributed. Then the organization of the SI Units into quantum constants with ES Charge quantified will be an open book to the Unified Field Theory. I call it APM, Secrets of the Aether.
:D
Unified Force
Unified Force Theory
Simple and Symmetrical
For over 100 years, physicists have been searching for a Unified Force Theory to unify what the Standard Model calls the electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear forces. Even more important is the Theory of Everything, which not only unifies the three previously mentioned forces, but also includes the gravitational force. The Aether Physics Model does provide a mathematically correct Theory of Everything that unifies all four forces. Since the four “forces” unify in the Aether Physics Model, "anti-gravity" effects may soon be engineered and the preferred mode of human travel will take a giant leap forward.

The Aether Physics Model sees all stable quantum matter (onta) as primary angular momentum, as already explained. Primary angular momentum passing through Aether produces charge effects. There are two types of charge, the electrostatic charge, and the strong charge. There is a precise proportion between the spherical electrostatic charge and the toroidal strong charge. The proportion of these charges is the “weak interaction,” or “charge proportion” of the onn.

The electrostatic charge is the “carrier” of the electrostatic force and the strong charge is the “carrier” of the electromagnetic or strong force. The strong charge is also directly proportional to the mass of the onn (via its angular momentum) and provides the link between the gravitational force and strong force.

The problem with the Standard Model interpretation of the strong force is that it is not quantified in the dimensions of charge, which would be compatible with the electrostatic force. Instead, an imaginary pion, or pi meson, was invented. By recognizing the Aether and its conductance, the strong charge was able to be quantified, which led to the completion of the Unified Force Theory. The theory is so simple, it was discovered only three weeks after the error of single dimension charge in Classical Mechanical units was corrected.

http://www.16pi2.com/unified_charge_theory.htm

Image
Last edited by junglelord on Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Post by junglelord » Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:37 pm

Image
Atomic Mechanics
How Atoms Release Energy
The only time Aether space overlaps is when two onta bind together through the strong force causing the Aether to fold over onto itself. Two Aether units without angular momentum passing through it cannot overlap because their charges would repel each other. When two onta come close to each other, their strong charges attract and cause the Aether units they are in to fold on top of each other. This is just like two magnets getting too close to each other, which suddenly gain energy, align their poles, and accelerate until they contact.

In the Aether Physics Model, the onta model as tubular loxodromes within space-resonance. When looking down the time axis we can see what a particle would look like in the world as perceived through human eyes (from within the forward time direction of half-spin onta).

Light is essentially accelerating angular momentum. When light strikes an atom, angular momentum from the light is absorbed and transferred to the valence electron. The absorption is a process of decelerating angular momentum.

In one quantum moment, there are a given number of photon fronts arriving at an atom. The photon front has a certain amount of angular momentum available to transfer to the atom. In order for that angular momentum to be absorbed, the frequency of the arriving light must time to the frequency of the atom or molecule receiving the light, otherwise it reflects. If the frequency of the atom or molecule is a frequency of the arriving light (even a harmonic frequency), the light will instantly decelerate and release the angular momentum, thus absorbing into the atom or molecule.

As angular momentum is absorbed into the atom or molecule, it is stored with the valence electron. The storage capability exists due to the valence electron having an “empty” positron spin position adjacent to it in the Aether unit (as all electrons do). The positron spin position and electron spin position have opposite direction of spin (and charge) but they both hold the same quantity of angular momentum. The accumulating angular momentum will continue to be stored in the positron position until the positron position is full. Since the two spin positions couple, the resulting onn is a double-sized electron. Since the electron-positron pair are coupled at their poles and have opposite spin, their north poles (or south poles) are adjoining within the Aether unit.

Depending how fast the positron spin position is filled (frequency of the atom or molecule), the complete double sized onn is kicked out of its valence orbit to a higher shell. This likely occurs because the combined electron-positron pair has no net negative charge, and is no longer attracted to the positive charge of the proton, or its strong charge neutralizes by the combination of the electron and positron, or both.

The above process of photon emission described the Compton Effect. Pair production occurs when the frequency of photons reaching an absorber is very high, such as in the bombardment with gamma rays. Instead of the double-sized onn jumping orbit to produce a photon, the entire double-sized onn knocks out of the atom or molecule. The like magnetic poles of the electron and positron then repel each other into opposite directions. And since the mass of the electron and positron are matter and anti-matter, they also experience a gravitational repulsion.

The mechanics of pair production does not differ much from the Standard Model mechanics of pair production, except that photons are viewed as the transfer of angular momentum instead of the transfer of energy. In the Aether Physics Model, the Aether unit mediates the strong force by acting on the strong charge. In cases where the strong charges keep a small distance apart, the Aether unit of Rotating Magnetic Field mediates the force manifesting between the strong charges.

If there is truly a conservation of energy and mass, then it should cost almost twice the fusion binding energy to separate the helium nucleus in a fission process. This is true since some of the subatomic mass was already lost during the fusion process (the mass lost during fusion must be replaced to conserve angular momentum, mass, and energy in the subatomic particles). However, the data shows that there is net energy radiating out of both fission and fusion processes; and the Standard Model theory clearly claims the “binding energy” is positive for both.

In the Aether Physics Model, onta bind to each other when Aether folds. Each independent Aether unit has a spin position available for a proton and anti-proton. When the proton spin position is full, the anti-proton spin position is not. The anti-proton spin position is equivalent to a proton spin position in another Aether unit at 180 degrees. When two protons come close enough, their Aether units fold over each other such that each proton fills the anti-proton spin position of the other proton. The same mechanism holds true for the neutron. Since the neutron is essentially a proton, except with a bound electron, it too shares the same mechanics.

The proton and neutron have slightly different angular momenta. This tends to cause protons to join only with protons through folded Aether units, and neutrons to join only with neutrons through folded Aether units. Thus, both protons and neutrons will generate the same “magic number” patterns independently of each other in various isotope configurations.

In addition, a proton and neutron can bind via electromagnetic charge (strong force) by adjoining their magnetic orientations. The neutron having a neutralized electrostatic charge assists the process of adjoining.

The pattern of binding takes the exact form identified by Linus Pauling in his Spheron Model of atomic structure. In either the fusion or the fission reactions, the dynamic Aether units move and thus the force between the atoms moves. The Gforce within the Aether units is the source of the “binding energy” when atomic nuclei change structure. Thus, all nuclear reactions give up more energy than what goes into the reaction.

In the Aether Physics Model, photons are onta with an inherent velocity. Photons can convert to electrons through the photoelectric effect. Thus if a device is properly constructed to produce photons via the Casimir effect (which is slightly corrected in the Aether Physics Model), and a circuit that converts photons to electrons is incorporated, then a steady flow of electric current can be put into motion without the need for a battery or dynamo.

As a direct result of strong charges continually coming in proximity to each other in atoms and molecules, and photons manifest between strong charges, there is a constant stream of new primary angular momentum introduced into the visible Universe. Atoms continually absorb these new photons, converting them to electrons, positrons, and photons via the photoelectric effect, Compton Effect, and pair production. The same process occurs between protons and neutrons to produce gamma rays. Essentially, all corona effects are photons generated by the Casimir effect.
http://www.16pi2.com/chapter_10__secret ... aether.htm
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Post by junglelord » Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:57 pm

Unified Field Theory of APM.

Image

Abstract
In a previous paper, we demonstrated a geometrical model of Aether, which includes a Unified Force Theory. The present paper reveals the calculations and method for proving the unification of the forces and provides additional discussion about the Aether Physics Model and the Standard Model of Particle Physics.

1. Introduction
In our paper, A New Foundation for Physics, we provide a coherent and quantified Aether Physics Model (APM), which unites the forces, Aether (environment) and matter. The Aether Physics Model further develops in our book, Secrets of the Aether[ii]. A key component of the Aether Physics Model is the mathematically correct Unified Force Theory, which bases upon two different manifestations of charges, and the assumption that all charge is always distributed (squared). We shall provide in this paper a more detailed analysis of the Unified Force Theory and show how the predicted relative strengths of the forces compare to the Standard Model (SM) predictions[iii].
Image

2. The Force Carriers
According to the Aether Physics Model, the dimension of subatomic particle mass is dependent upon the subatomic particle’s angular momentum. Subatomic particle mass always occurs within the quantum structure as a circular line (string) and moves perpendicular to its circumference. We can call the circular string of mass the Ligamen Circulatus (LC), and the moving ligamen circulatus we can call Primary Angular Momentum. When a quantum Aether unit does not encapsulate the ligamen circulatus, the LC exists as dark matter. The encapsulation of primary angular momentum by the Aether converts the dark matter into visible matter by imparting charges.

There are two distinct manifestations of charges, the electrostatic charge, and the electromagnetic charge. The electrostatic charge is a direct property of the Aether. When primary angular momentum is absorbed into an Aether unit, the primary angular momentum acquires the electrostatic charge of the electrostatic dipole with which it is associated. Since the electrostatic charge is a property of the Aether, it has the same value regardless of whether it is associated with a negative electron or positive proton. The electrostatic charge has spherical angle, one-spin geometry.

As the primary angular momentum spins within the five dimensions of the Aether structure, its interaction with the conductance of the Aether causes the phenomenon of electromagnetic charge. Unlike the Standard Model of Particle Physics, the electromagnetic charge of the Aether Physics Model is not a function of a moving electrostatic charge with point geometry. The electromagnetic charge has surface area and takes the form of tubular cardioid geometry, which is geometrically equivalent to toroidal geometry. This toroidal electromagnetic charge shares the half spin nature of the subatomic particle.

Within the Aether Physics Model, we use a new tool for analyzing quantum structure named Quantum Measurements Analysis. Quantum measurements analysis is similar to dimensional analysis, except that the dimensions are also associated with measured quantum quantities. Therefore, we can produce the following quantum measurements for our analysis of the forces:
Image


The electrostatic force carrier has the value of the elementary charge squared. The electromagnetic charges of the electron, proton, and neutron are calculated from the angular momentum of the subatomic particle times the conductance constant of the Aether. Following the structure of the electron angular momentum, the proton and neutron angular momentum calculates as their mass times the Compton wavelength (quantum length) times the speed of light. Their values present as:
Image



Thus, the electromagnetic charges of the electron, proton, and neutron are equal to their angular momentum times the conductance of the Aether:
Image


Other key quantum constants, infamously known in the SM as “convenience constants,” present as Coulomb’s electrostatic constant, Newton ’s gravitational constant, and the Compton wavelength (which is also the quantum length):
Image



Another new constant in the APM is the strong force constant, which is also the quantification of the quantum Aether unit. The quantum Aether unit also views as a quantum rotating magnetic field.
Image


3. Discussion of the Forces
The electrostatic force in the Aether Physics Model is the same as the static “electromagnetic force’ in the Standard Model. In the Aether Physics Model, the electrostatic charge shows specifically to have spherical angle and one spin. Although the charges do not have inherent associated length, their distributed nature allows for distributed existence on surfaces. A positive and negative electrostatic charge resides separately in each half of the Aether unit, creating the Aether electrostatic dipole.

In addition to an electrostatic dipole, the Aether unit also has four spin positions; one each for the electron, antiproton, proton, and positron. When primary angular momentum inhabits any of the spin positions, the angular momentum interacts with the conductance of the Aether to produce electromagnetic charge. The electromagnetic charge has tubular loxodrome geometry in five dimensions of space-resonance (three dimensions of length and two dimensions of frequency). The two dimensions of frequency in space-resonance are the frequency of forward/backward time and the frequency of right/left spin direction. To our four dimensional space-time perspective, the electromagnetic charge has tubular cardioid geometry, which has surface area mathematically equivalent to toroidal geometry. Since the angular momentum producing the electromagnetic charge only spins in the forward direction of time and either the right or left spin direction, the electromagnetic charge also has half spin. The electromagnetic charge produces north and south magnetic poles, creating the magnetic dipole of the subatomic particle.

Compared to the scanned surface of the electromagnetic charge, the ligamen circulatus, which contains the very small mass of the subatomic particle, appears orthogonal to the electromagnetic charge due to its perpendicular motion.

The electromagnetic charge is the carrier of the strong force, which binds the subatomic particles in an atomic nucleus. In the Aether Physics Model, quarks are not small particles composing protons and neutrons, but rather quarks are the debris of broken subatomic particles as the Aether collapses and the encapsulated angular momentum of the visible matter spills back to the sea of dark matter.

Due to the movements of the LC within the toroidal geometry of the subatomic particles, when two protons or two neutrons bind together, their toroidal geometries shrink the major radius and expand the minor radius, which results in spherical geometry. While the subatomic particle is in its free state , the Aether unit force constant prevails over the toroidal geometry, but as two subatomic particles bind, the geometry shifts to spherical, and the Coulomb constant prevails as the force mediator constant. Therefore, the strong force can appear to have variable strength during the binding and unbinding processes.

In the APM, the neutron quantifies as a bound electron and proton, which has captured dark matter between the bound strong charges. The captured angular momentum contributes to the total angular momentum of the neutron while it is bound. When the electron and proton bind in a neutron, their north magnetic poles are facing each other, thus there is magnetic repulsion fighting against electrostatic attraction. The magnetic moments of the electron and proton in a neutron cause the distance between the electron and proton to vary in length, as well as the angle between strong charges to vary. When the two magnetic moments synchronize such that the electron and proton push against each other with maximum effect, the distances between the electron and proton separate far enough for the electrostatic bond to break. The ratio of the electrostatic charge to electromagnetic charge is thus the so-called “weak force,” or weak interaction. The relative strength of the force between the electrostatic and electromagnetic charges will vary depending upon distance, charge angles, and charge geometry; hence, the weak interaction will have a great range of values, depending on the conditions.

4. Relative Strengths of the Force Carriers
In the Standard Model, the electrostatic charge (also named elementary charge) notates in single charge dimension. In the Aether Physics Model, all charges notate in distributed dimensions (squared). Therefore, when comparing the relative strengths of the force carriers, we need to consider the dimension notation differences. The strong force carrier for the proton and neutron compared to the electrostatic force carrier is:
Image


Therefore, the strong force carrier is 100 times greater than the electrostatic force carrier is (according to SM notation), but 10,000 times greater according to APM notation of charges. Yet because the force carriers are in single dimensions in the SM and distributed dimensions in the APM, the force carriers in both expressions are equal:
Image


In the Aether Physics Model, the electrostatic charge relates to the electromagnetic charge by the unified charge equations:
Image


where alpha is the electron fine structure constant, p is the proton fine structure constant, and n is the neutron fine structure constant. As the unified charge equations reveal, the spherical angle, one-spin electrostatic charge equates to the steradian angle, half-spin electromagnetic charge multiplied by 2 to equate spin, and multiplied by 4p to equate solid angles. The fine structure is the magnitude difference of the equivalent spherical angle, one-spin charges.

The proportion of electrostatic charge to electromagnetic charge is the basis for the so-called weak interaction, or “weak force.”
Image


Therefore, the weak interaction of the proton and neutron has a magnitude of about 10-2 compared to the electrostatic charge, and 10-6 compared to the electromagnetic charge

When comparing the gravitational force acting on a nucleon to the strong force acting on a bound nucleon we see:
Image


The unification of gravity to the other forces occurs through angular momentum and electromagnetic charge. Due to the mass of a subatomic particle being inseparable from its angular momentum, and the angular momentum being essential to the production of electromagnetic charge, there is a constant mass to electromagnetic charge ratio, which applies invariably across the physical Universe.
Image


To put it concisely, the gravitational force is orthogonal to the strong force and the quantum quantity of angular momentum contributing to the strong force is the same quantum quantity of angular momentum contributing to the gravitational force.

All three of the force constants Au, kC, G factor to a common Gforce. The Gforce has the value:
Image


The Gforce factors from the constants as:
Image


where ea2 is the electromagnetic charge associated with the Aether and ma is the mass associated with the Aether.

5. Standard Model Relative Strengths of the Forces
“Our job in physics is to see things simply, to understand a great many complicated phenomena in a unified way, in terms of a few simple principles.” – Steven Weinberg[iv]

Compared to the quantum structure of forces, environment, and matter provided by the Aether Physics Model, the Standard Model of Particle Physics is anything but simple. In the APM, there are four fundamental particles of matter (electron, proton, positron, antiproton) and two types of photons (electron/positron, and proton/antiproton). All the forces in the APM unify to the Gforce and obey simple Newtonian type force equations, all matter quantifies as primary angular momentum, and the environment quantifies as quantum rotating magnetic field.

The SM explains quantum structure in terms of a dozen fermions and a dozen bosons, and one type of photon[v]. The forces explain in terms of complicated and dissimilar paradigms[vi]. Gravity equations relate curved space-time tensors to mass/energy tensors[vii], of which neither space-time curvature nor mass/energy are physical entities. Strong force counter-intuitively explains by imaginary particles called mesons, of which many different sizes have been “discovered.” Further, the mesons then compose from more fundamental forces named “strong color force.” Out of this has emerged the branch of physics called Quantum Chromodynamics[viii].

The so-called “weak nuclear force” does not express in terms of force, but as a dimensionless number[ix]. Yet, this dimensionless number mediates by massive particles called W± and Z bosons.

In the SM, a charge presents as a point particle. The fact that a point has zero dimensions means that force exchange particles would have infinite mass if calculated by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle[x]. This not being acceptable, the force carriers of the strong and weak forces had to arbitrarily be given different structures than point particles, and thus were assigned the necessary imaginary qualities.

To complicate things further, the SM only recognizes one manifestation of charge, the electrostatic (elementary) charge[xi]. Thus, electromagnetic observations incorrectly explain in terms of moving electrostatic charge[xii]. Yet, it is apparent from observations of the electron through the Zeeman effect the electron has inherent magnetic dipoles[xiii]. If the electron has inherent magnetism, then how can electron magnetism be explained by moving charge when the electron is the charge carrier?

To illustrate the chaos of modern theories of quantum structure, let us look at the predictions of the relative strengths of the forces as determined in the SM as compared to the Aether Physics Model. The table below represents seven different reputable sources of physics information. Each source predicts a different set of relative force strengths, and unfortunately, none of the sources reveals the exact math and method used to deduce the values.

Image

Of particular note is the use of the electron fine structure constant as the relative strength of the electrostatic force. The relative strength of the electrostatic force is supposed to be in relation to the strong force. Since there is no mathematical basis in the SM relating the electrostatic force to the strong force by way of the fine structure constant, the fine structure constant appears arbitrarily assigned. The above sources quantify the electron fine structure by its cgs units representation e2/ħc , which only shrouds the situation in deeper mystery. According to SM authorities, h-bar and c are merely convenience constants, having no real physical representation. Furthermore, according to the SM, all charge expresses as single dimension. There is no logic for squaring the SM elementary charge in showing the relative strength of the strong force to the electrostatic force.

Many as a great success in physics have touted the SM, yet the forces do not unify, and each force has a different method of force calculation, because none of the force theories is mathematically consistent with each other. The view of charges and quantum particles as points, which dictates by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, further cripples the ability of the SM to unify the forces. For the claim of seeing complicated phenomena in a simple way, the SM is grossly disjointed, incomplete, and inconsistent in its presentation.

Although the Aether Physics Model may seem complicated due to the many new paradigm shifts needed to view it, these shifts are necessary only because the SM exists as the “normal” view. The complexity of the SM is its disjointed, incomplete, and inconsistent nature. Once properly understood, the APM appears as a unified, complete description of quantum structure, and self-consistent, making it a very simple model of physics.

6. Conclusion
According to the Aether Physics Model, the strong force mediates by a second type of charge, which we properly call electromagnetic charge. The electromagnetic charge is quantifiably different from electrostatic charge in geometry, spin, and magnitude. When protons and neutrons bind, the toroidal geometry alters to a spherical geometry, thus invoking the Coulomb constant as the force mediator constant. The strong charge, although capable of variations in force magnitude, always maintains a constant mass to electromagnetic charge ratio. From these newly discovered physics principles, the Aether Physics Model properly computes the relative strengths of the forces.

Acknowledgement
We thank Dr. G. Hooper of Leicester UK for encouraging us to write this paper for the British Royal Society, and Dr. Phil Risby of DES Group for his suggestions.

References




David W. Thomson and Jim D. Bourassa, “A New Foundations for Physics” (Paper submitted to Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory conference, Imperial College, London, September 2006) http://www.16pi2.com/files/NewFoundationPhysics.pdf

[ii] David W. Thomson and Jim D. Bourassa, “Secrets of the Aether” (Aenor Trust, Alma , IL , 2004) http://www.16pi2.com/book.htm

[iii] Mesgun Sebhatu, “The Standard Model of Fundamental Particles and Their Interactions” (Project PHYSNET, Michigan State University , Michigan USA )

[iv] Steven Weinberg, “Conceptual Foundations of the Unified Theory of Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions” (Lyman Laboratory of Physics Harvard University and Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Cambridge, Mass., USA., December 8, 1979) p 1

[v] The Columbia Encyclopedia 6th ed., s.v. "Elementary Particles, table," (accessed October 5, 2006).

[vi] The Columbia Encyclopedia 6th ed., s.v. "Elementary Particles," (accessed October 5, 2006).

[vii] The Columbia Encyclopedia 6th ed., s.v. "Gravitation," (accessed October 5, 2006).

[viii] The Columbia Encyclopedia 6th ed., s.v. "Quantum Chromodynamics," (accessed October 5, 2006).

[ix] John D. Barrow, and Frank J. Tipler, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988), p 294

[x] Robert K. Adair, The Great Design: Particles, Fields, and Creation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), pp 225-226

[xi] The Columbia Encyclopedia 6th ed., s.v. "Charge," (accessed October 5, 2006).

[xii] A. P. French, Special Relativity (New York: Norton, 1968), p 234

[xiii] The Columbia Encyclopedia 6th ed., s.v. "Zeeman Effect," (accessed October 5, 2006).

http://www.16pi2.com/unified_charge_theory.htm
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

altonhare
Posts: 1212
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:54 am
Location: Baltimore
Contact:

Re: Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Post by altonhare » Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:35 am

I mostly responded to GC in PM, but I want to make clear to everyone that there's a misconception here based on definitions. When I use the word "object" I am referring to a single piece, i.e. something continuous. The only way this can cease to exist is for something to become nothing, this is an explicit contradiction. This is exactly the justification for my statement.

On the other hand the word "entity" indicates a perceptually defined arrangement of objects. If the perceiver no longer perceives "truck" but rather "wreckage" then the entity "truck" no longer exists and the entity "wreckage" was created. Creation is solely a process of the rearrangement of constituents and the perceptual identification of that arrangement. In this way entities are constantly being created and destroyed but objects never are. So entities are not created/destroyed by "something coming from nothing" or vice versa, but strictly by *motion*.

Sorry JL, but I just had to clear that up b/c I can see how many people would think what I was saying was wrong.
Physicist: This is a pen

Mathematician: It's pi*r2*h

kevin
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:17 am

Re: Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Post by kevin » Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:54 am

Altonhare,
Have You ever thought of the difference between,
NOTHING and NO-THING?
I consider that there is no-thing called nothing, nothing does not exist, empty space is not nothing it is no-thing.Matter is no-thing coalesced to make matter, matter can reverse to become no-thing.
matter that becomes no-thing will not leave any debris, that is still matter .

The grand canyon may have been filled with matter that reverted back to no-thing, possibly due to half of no-thing been in abundance and thus breaking apart the bindings of the coalesced opposites .
I can follow the flows of no-thing, therefore they cannot be nothing, if a flow of no-thing becomes over dominant, do not reside in it's pathway, it is well shown as the grim reaper scything down the living.
kevin

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Post by junglelord » Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:20 pm

We have successfully developed the electron binding energy equation, which accurately predicts the 1s orbital electron binding energies for all the atomic elements.

The pages presented on this web are a sampling of the Aether Physics Model. All the below information is consolidated in our white paper and in our book, Secrets of the Aether. The links to the left break the Aether Physics Model into three categories; Aether, Matter, and Forces. Each page has links to several other pages in that category, which highlight key aspects of the Aether Physics Model.

Whereas modern physics describes what the Universe does, the Aether Physics Model describes what the Universe is. To find this new understanding required the discovery that all charge is distributed. Analyzing Planck's constant, Coulomb's constant, and the Newton gravitational constant further led to the geometrical structure of the quantum realm. The Aether Physics Model is mathematically correct and yields a consistent quantification of subatomic structure and also identifies and quantifies the Aether. A logical extension of this new physics model has been a new system of quantum units, composed of quantum measurements, which give more accurate insights into physics processes. Even "light" and "photons" have their own units.

The Aether Physics Model has already yielded a mathematically correct Unified Force Theory, the foundation for an atomic binding energy equation, an electron binding energy equation, a conductance constant, fine structure constants for the proton and neutron, and geometrical models for both photons and atomic nuclei structure.

Metaphysical concepts such as wave-particle duality and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, which are based upon a mass/energy paradigm are replaced by discrete physics based on an Aether/angular momentum paradigm. All mathematics in the Aether Physics Model are fully compatible with Classical Mechanics. The use of calculus in describing the quantum realm is minimized as all physics concepts, including the "energy binding" equations, are discrete and thus can be expressed in simple algebraic expressions.

There are several new physics terms, not because they have been recently invented, but because they have not been previously discovered or recognized for their importance. This theory uses the MKS system of units (unless otherwise noted) since it is more descriptive than the SI system.

The photon is equal to h * c and refers to the angular momentum imparted by an electron, which is radiating at the speed of light outward from its source. Notice that the dimensions of energy and photon are different. Photons are not the same thing as energy or mass and so must have different dimensions from energy and mass.

Angular Momentum - Light, the transmission of light, the absorption of light, and the emission of light are described in terms of angular momentum. Also, all subatomic "particles" (onta) are angular momentum. Angular momentum is the primary state of matter.

The Aether - The Aether is historically discussed as an undetectable substance that carries light waves across the Universe. The Aether Physics Model shows the Aether is made up of quantum units of rotating magnetic field that define the boundaries and quantities of primary angular momentum. The Aether is mathematically quantifiable.

Gforce - The enormous force behind the Aether has a specific quantity and is found to be the driving force behind the gravitational force, electrostatic force, and strong force.

Atomic Structure - The Aether Physics Model yields a common-sense atomic geometry. Angular momentum is described as the basic building block for atoms. The nucleus is composed of generally toroidal shaped clusters of protons and neutrons. The mechanics for how the angular momentum forms toroids and spheres is described. The structure of the nucleus bases upon Linus Pauling's Spheron model.

Binding Force - The Aether Physics Model may yield a simple equation for nuclear binding force.

Electron Binding Force - The Aether Physics Model may also yield an electron binding force equation.

Unified Force Theory - The Aether Physics Model has clearly identified the true nature of the strong nuclear force, weak interaction and elementary charge. These three "forces" work together and are elegantly expressed in the Unified Charge Equations.

Coulomb's Constant - Coulomb's constant is the direct result of permeability, permittivity, conductance, and the speed of light.

Gravitational Constant - The gravitational constant shares the same source and structure as Coulomb's constant. The gravitational constant is orthogonal to the Aether constant, or rotating magnetic field constant.

Charge - All charge is distributed, according to Charles Coulomb. Therefore all units should be in distributed charge dimensions.

Fine Structure - The origin of the fine structure constants is shown to be a result of one-spin-spherical-electrostatic charge and half-spin-steradian-strong charge proportion.

Units Grid - The quantum measurements system of units presents a wider selection of useable units than does today's Classical physics. The units are laid out in tables that present insights into how the units are structured.

Magnetic Moment - Magnetic moment is analyzed and errors in the modern values for neutron magnetic moment are presented.

Neutron - The neutron is quantified as a bound electron and proton. The anti-neutrino is shown to be a quantity of dark matter that is caught in the binding.
http://www.16pi2.com/aether_physics_model.htm
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Post by junglelord » Sat Jan 03, 2009 3:26 am

An electron expanding at the speed of light....a photon, assumes a double cardioid shape as it expands.
In 1923, Arthur Compton noted that J.J. Thomson's model of the electron did not account for the lower frequency (longer wavelength) associated with "electron scattering." To account for this, Compton imagined the photon as a billiard ball that passed through the atom and dislodged electrons from a force within the atom according to the Doppler principle. [1]

Compton's theory accounts for the momentum of the photon itself, and explains the scattering of radiation in terms of corpuscular photons, but it does not explain how the photons always manage to miss the nucleus of the atom or fail to strike electrons from the outside toward the inside of the atom. His theory also fails to take into account the angular momentum of the incident photon.

Further, Compton's theory of a corpuscular incident photon assumes that the light is emitted as bullets that happen to be shot directly at the target. Also, this bullet would have to retain its full energy from the moment it left its source and transfer its full energy to the target atom.

Quantum Photon
In the Aether Physics Model the photon is quantified as a true quantum of angular momentum. It is equal to the angular momentum of the electron (Planck's constant) times the speed of light:

Photon = h x c

Light is then quantified as the photon times frequency:

Light = photon x frequency

Transmission
The quantum Aether unit has two spin. That means there are four half-spin spin positions in the Aether unit. The photon has one spin. As seen in the image below, the photon fills two spin positions within the Aether unit.

Image

The 1 spin Aether unit looks like a snake in the above picture, but that is what it would look like moving through time. Since we are already moving with time, the only view of the photon we have is from the z axis. The photon looking down on the z axis appears as the following image:

Image

The photon expands in a cardioid shape. The function that produces this shape is the Compton function:

Image

Absorption
As an atom absorbs light, the angular momentum is stored in the positron spin position of the valence electron. The amount of angular momentum available from the light is determined by the distance between the emitting and absorbing atoms and the power available at absorption. The further the distance between the emitter and absorber means less power is available.

light = power x length

Because the atom has only certain resonances in which it can absorb angular momentum, the amount of angular momentum being absorbed depends on the resonant frequency of the absorbing atom

power = h x resonace

In the above case, the angular momentum is not quantum, but depends on the power level reaching the absorber atom and its resonant frequency.

Emission
As the valence electron fills the positron spin position with angular momentum, it eventually attains the mass of two electrons and has a net zero electrostatic charge. Having a net zero charge, the nucleus of the atom no longer pulls the combined electron-positron onn and it explodes outward toward the next Aether unit.

Depending on the amount of power reaching the atom, the double-sized onn either splits into a separate electron and positron (pair production) or splits into two photons. One photon emits outward according to the geometry of the Compton function above and the other is reabsorbed to the valence position and all the angular momentum moves to the electron spin position.

For a more detailed introduction to the Aether Physics Model, see our white paper, "A New Foundation for Physics," or our book, "Secrets of the Aether."

[1] Great Experiments in Physics, edited by Morris H. Shamos, Dover Publications Inc., 1959

http://www.16pi2.com/angular_momentum.htm
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Post by junglelord » Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:59 am

An important constant in mathematics is the spherical constant, otherwise known as 4pi. 4pi is not dimensionless. It is a dimension of itself. The geometry of the sphere is intricately woven into the structure of the Aether and this Universe.

for example 4pi is a dimension of permeability:
Image

It is also a dimension of permittivity:
Image

The dimension of 4pi is part of the conductance of the Aether:
Image

Converting the above expressions from MKS units to cgs units yields the following expressions of:
permeability
Image
permittivity
Image
and conductance
Image

4pi also is the reciprocal of the product of Coulomb's constant times permittivity:
Image

as well as the reciprocal of the product of light speed times conductance times permeability:
Image

Another instance of the spherical constant appears in the product of the quantum measurements of capacitance and potential:
Image

In all of the above expressions it is easy to see the appearance of 4pi in the Aether. 4pi indicates that the Aether has spherical (curved) geometry. And, in fact, the geometry of the Aether unit appears as two orthogonal spheres.

When looking at the Unified Charge Equation:
Image

or (1.11)

Image

it is seen that twice the half spin electromagnetic charge (e emax2) squared times the spherical constant times alpha, is equal to the electrostatic charge squared. Since the denominator is multiplied by the spherical constant electrostatic charge is spherical in nature. Thus the numerator and denominator of equation 1.11 are geometrically balanced.

A better understanding of how the 4p spherical constant is embedded into quantum structure, read the white paper, "A New Foundation for Physics," or the book, "Secrets of the Aether."
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Secrets of the Aether, Questions and Answers

Post by junglelord » Sun Jan 11, 2009 7:37 pm

If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 11 guests