Ah, thanks for clearing this up.Grey Cloud wrote:Hi Mague,
ID = Intelligent Design, a theory based on irreducible complexity.
The intelligence of the "bio nanites" (cells) collective mind is beyond our grasp indeed
Ah, thanks for clearing this up.Grey Cloud wrote:Hi Mague,
ID = Intelligent Design, a theory based on irreducible complexity.
Maybe it was not supposed to be grasped, just resonated with, the very act of thinking is a disciplined disconnection into the realm of the observer.mague wrote:Ah, thanks for clearing this up.Grey Cloud wrote:Hi Mague,
ID = Intelligent Design, a theory based on irreducible complexity.
The intelligence of the "bio nanites" (cells) collective mind is beyond our grasp indeed
Well... almost all of us are victims of cultural weakness's.Orlando wrote:Maybe it was not supposed to be grasped, just resonated with, the very act of thinking is a disciplined disconnection into the realm of the observer.mague wrote:Ah, thanks for clearing this up.Grey Cloud wrote:Hi Mague,
ID = Intelligent Design, a theory based on irreducible complexity.
The intelligence of the "bio nanites" (cells) collective mind is beyond our grasp indeed
people are funny: they wish to see that which can only be felt and feel that which can only be seen.
Peace
Or
Cremo, and others, are challenging current archeological notions, and rightfully so. Unfortunately, he's not challenging the unreliable dating techniques used that render such extraordinary "findings." We, indeed, may have a very long history on this planet. But I feel that there simply may not be enough intact uncorrupted forensic evidence available to ever determine our origins and ancient past with any accuracy or reliability.GaryN wrote:"Anatomically modern humans have been present on the Earth not just for 100,000 years or less (the orthodox version), but for millions of years, and that metal objects of advanced design have been in use at equally early periods."
...And was good to his mother.webolife wrote:I agree with the DNA results being misrepresented as to their completeness and accuracy.
Neanderthals exist today. I worked with one in the 80's, a brute of a man with a severely sloping forehead and very heavy brow ridges. We did summer work together in a slaughterhouse. He could handle a 250 pound pig like a lapdog. He also knew 11 languages and taught in a local university.
No arguments from me. I'm in the Vedic camp when it comes to the longevity of 'humans'.webolife wrote:That he was
Over the past 37-ish years that I've believed neanderthals were "fully" human, the folks I have encountered who insist on the "neanderthals were not humans" thesis are in generally one of these camps:
1. Die-hard egocentric evolutionists, who can't believe that humans were always as intelligent as they are today.
2. OEC advocates, who can't fit the evidence for intelligent spiritual pre-Cro-Magnon humans into their local [non-catastrophic] flood scenario. This is probably a non-EU issue, so that's all I'll say about this on the forum, but I'd be happy to correspond by PM with anyone interested in taking up the discussion.
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~feliks/g ... index.htmlLearn the story of how empirical and unequivocal geometric data challenging a paradigm and presented in a mainstream forum has been held back from publication by the European, Australian, and U. S. scientific communities. Learn how this data (held back since 2006) demonstrates beyond any doubt that there has been no change whatsoever in human cognitive ability for at least 400,000 years. (J. Feliks)
The underlying premise of The Graphics of Bilzingsleben is that there has been no change whatsoever in human cognitive ability for at least 400,000 years. This statement is quite easily extended back at least 1.4 to 1.8 million years, and, in fact, to whatever point in time we choose to assign the first appearance of the genus Homo.
A new analysis of European tree-ring samples suggests that mild summers may have been the key to the rise of the Roman Empire—and that prolonged droughts, cold snaps, and other climate changes might have played a part in historical upheavals, from the barbarian invasions that brought about Rome's collapse to the Black Death that wiped out much of medieval Europe.
The researchers worked out climate information the same way. First, they compared weather records collected over the past 200 years with samples from living trees to see how temperature and moisture affected tree-ring growth. Then Büntgen and his co-authors looked at timbers from historic buildings, wood preserved in rivers or bogs, and samples from archaeological sites to push the record further back. The study used 7284 oak samples from France and Germany to see how moisture showed up in tree rings and nearly 1500 different stone pine and larch samples from high altitudes in Austria to establish a separate temperature record.
http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2 ... .html?etocThe study also showed that climate and catastrophe often line up. In the 3rd century C.E., for example, extended droughts matched the timing of barbarian invasions and political turmoil. Around 1300 C.E., on the other hand, a cold snap combined with wetter summers coincides with widespread famines and plague that wiped out nearly half of Europe's population by 1347.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest