Speaking of incomprehensible, Plasmatic, I'm afraid many of your last points lost me in the jargon.
If you will point out where your confusion is I'll happily rephrase.
Web said:
I do not put natural selection and angels on the same level... however many have experienced angels in a miraculous way that cannot be scientifically certified, while others believe that natural selection can accomplish miracles of macro-evolution. I've noticed that many evolutionists are now using "macro-evolution" in a way that obfuscates the difference between micro and macro-e.
You didn't state explicitly what differentiates the two for you..... Is one more justified?.. Is one not a matter of faith? Is your acceptance of the report of others claim to "miraculous" experiences justified? Is ones rejection of the very concept of "miraculous" as meaningless-invalid an instance of faith, or of a different criteria for meaning?
Ps. I found your point about micro e. entailing as much natural selection as macro e. substantive.