Rduke wrote:Excellent work of late mgmirkin, you are providing me with some excellent links that I have either never read, went to read and got sidetracked, or did indeed read and then lost the link to the ether ...
I really appreciate that you are bringing them all back together for me in a tidy package..
![]()
Rduke wrote:Excellent work of late mgmirkin, you are providing me with some excellent links that I have either never read, went to read and got sidetracked, or did indeed read and then lost the link to the ether ...
I really appreciate that you are bringing them all back together for me in a tidy package..
![]()
Krackonis wrote:If you do have an opportunity to laugh a bit. Do a you tube search on Velikovsky and Carl Sagan. Carl Sagan makes some much needed words on listening to all the evidence, but in the end dismisses Velikovsky. I think it's just nice to see how far we have come to turning the gavity based tides.![]()
tom_s wrote:This site is home to Oliver Manuel's output. It hold a wealth of valuable information relating to the Sun: http://www.omatumr.com/
Example:
THE SUN: AN ELECTRO-MAGNETIC PLASMA DIFFUSER THAT CONTROLS EARTH'S CLIMATE
(With web links to atomic weight measurements that unmasked the Iron Sun)
http://www.omatumr.com/abstracts2005/Th ... Origin.pdf
More at the first link above.
I posted a comment on the CERN LHC by Manuel to this forum only a few days ago, which is here:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpB ... .php?t=139
The gas model of the Sun appears to be crumbling before our eyes.
lk wrote:.Thornhill seems to favor the gas model of the sun http://www.kronia.com/thoth/ThotIV05.txt and considers the iron sun idea as founded on faulty premisses http://www.kronia.com/thoth/thoVI-01.txt.
.THOTH - VOL VI, No 1 - Jan 15, 2002 - ... The fixation on rare supernovae as the source of all the heavy elements [the iron sun theory assumes that the iron comes from such a supernova], which they dissipate into deep space, strikes me as one of the silliest ideas in cosmology (and it has plenty of competition). This latest proposal, like so much else in cosmology, is driven by a theory that is built upon many others, each with so many knobs to twiddle that the outcome could as well have been an ornithorhynchus as a planetary system. It is all concocted after the event and is not predictive. It is time to start from scratch.
.The fact that "strange xenon is enriched in isotopes that are made when a supernova explodes," and we find it in meteorites and on the Moon and Jupiter, does suggest a local origin. But a model that does not require an extraordinary event is to be preferred. One of the simplest means of producing short-lived and strange isotopes is to use a particle accelerator. Plasma discharges are natural particle accelerators. So the simplest solution is to suggest that plasma discharges accompanied the formation of meteorites, the Moon, Jupiter and most likely all other bodies in the solar system. But because the experiences of each body is unique under these circumstances, we should expect a fruit salad of planets and moons. And with such different faces it proposes the question of who was parent to whom, and when?
.~Wal Thornhill
.I've also compacted nearly all of Thornhill's and Don Scott's Thoth articles here: http://www.freewebs.com/soyps/thoth.htm.
NASA's SOHO satellite and the Trace satellite program have both imaged this transition layer of the sun that sits beneath the photosphere. These 21st century satellites and technologies now enable us to peer behind the outer plasma layers of the chromosphere and photosphere and allow us to study the rocky, calcium ferrite transitional layer with incredible precision.
The gas model sun was founded by Galileo, observed the sun through a relatively primitive telescope and noticed that sunspots did not rotate uniformly across the surface of the photosphere. He also observed that this visible “surface” rotated at different speeds near the equator than it did near the poles.
From his study of sunspots and their uneven movement, Galileo surmised that he must be looking at some type of gas. He was correct in that assessment, although today we know that the photosphere is a form of hot ionized plasma.
Unfortunately, Galileo also "assumed" that no other solid layers existed, or could exist beneath the visible layer of the photosphere. That was a critical mistake. It was a bit like looking at a world covered in water, and having no ability to see beneath the water and simply assuming that the whole world is made of water.
The running difference imaging technique used by both NASA and Lockheed Martin have revealed to us for the first time that the sun is not simply a ball of hydrogen gas in space; it has a hard and rigid ferrite surface below the visible photosphere that can be seen in all of the images.
Studies of quasars in the early universe demonstrate the presence of large quantities of iron, casting serious doubt on the gas model in recent years.
In addition, there is now growing evidence from the field of heliosiesmology that the sun possesses a significant stratification layer at a very shallow depth from the top of the photosphere.
This new data suggest that the sun in fact has a stratified iron surface, covered by a relatively thin veneer of plasma layers.
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Could...ce-52143.shtml
lk wrote:Interesting images.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests