While this is interesting, how does this explain the mass of the electron versus that of the proton? Both have the same (but opposite) charge value, but with significantly different mass. What kind of experiments confirm their charge&mass and which indicate the above claim?Mass is a property of matter, and there are indications that it varies with the net charge on a body.
X-1 Files (mass vs charge)
- Siggy_G
- Moderator
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 11:05 am
- Location: Norway
X-1 Files (mass vs charge)
I found the article interesting and agreeing to the questioning, as with pretty much all TPODs. However, I'm wondering about this claim, which I've read before:
-
- Guest
Re: X-1 Files (mass vs charge)
Yeah i didn't get that bit either. Also it didn't seem necessary.
The charged twin star hypothesis explains high attraction orbital forces that large hot stars seem to be subject to.
I haven't heard that charging an object changes its mass much, but its possible different electric environments change the gravitational constant. I've considered the 'dinosaurs were too big' argument.
The charged twin star hypothesis explains high attraction orbital forces that large hot stars seem to be subject to.
I haven't heard that charging an object changes its mass much, but its possible different electric environments change the gravitational constant. I've considered the 'dinosaurs were too big' argument.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests