Venus Magnetic Reconnection Supports Electric Universe

[quantauniverse]

Plasmoids in the magnetotail formed by magnetic reconnection are now believed to be common in the magnetosphere of ALL planets, including planets lacking an intrinsic magnetic field like Venus. Venus behaves like a comet, and magnetic reconnection is the electrodynamic interaction between the solar wind, ionosphere, and magnetotail of a planet. The solar system, our local star group, and galaxy are surrounded by these magnetized bubbles having electric currents. This is a major discovery to support EU, because previously it was not believed that plasmoids were so common. Venus has a scaled-down magnetosphere version of earth, and plasma scales in the universe according to how it was first described by Haanes Alfven.
http://holographicgalaxy.blogspot.com/2 ... ction.html

[Sparky]

magnetic reconnection

why do you use that term? what does it mean to you? can you describe it , using magnetic flux fields, voltage or currents?

what disconnected the magnetic fields to begin with.? what reconnected to what? how? what formed the bubbles?

I have only a vague idea of what is happening...thanks

[quantauniverse]

magnetic reconnection explosively emits kinetic energy or "motion energy", and heat that can convert into light and electricity, when opposite polarity structures merge or collide and complete an electric circuit. Electric and magnetic fields are dynamically shaping everything at all scales, so what we call magnetic reconnection is the MACROSCOPIC view of how atoms attract electrons that merge collide into orbital wave packets around opposite charged nuclei. It is a great mystery just to explain it without knowing much about it for all those believing that gravity is entirely causing planets to orbit the sun. The solar wind is caused by the plasma sun streaming around the galaxy in a spiral arm filament and encountering the magnetic field of the interstellar medium. The solar wind is not really caused by nuclear fusion by gravity! This is a big blunder that I deduced in current cosmology, because the electric star models are really observed. This forms our local solar system's magnetized PLASMOID bubble, and larger bubbles around our local star group, milky way bubbles, galaxy cluster bubbles, in fractal patterns. The magnetosphere forms away from the sun when the solar wind hits the upper ionosphere of every planet, moon, and likely tiny asteroids have microscopic magnetospheres if the solar wind or moving charged particles are directed towards them. This is how the electric circuit gets completed when the plasmoid in the magnetotail reverses dierection and heads back towards the planet, causing auroras and what I believe is the kinetic motion energy that moves and causes the planet to orbit the sun, analogous to how trojan asteroids and electrons orbit the atomic nucleus by electric fields.

[Sparky]

Thanks...

[nick c]

Just for the purpose of clarification; the Electric Universe does not recognize any reality to the term "magnetic reconnection." It is considered to be a misnomer for an already understood plasma process.
Scott explains it:

Alfvén ridiculed this explanation by saying, “A magnetic field line is by definition a line which is everywhere parallel to the magnetic field. If the current system changes, the shape of the magnetic field line changes but it is meaningless to speak about a translational movement of magnetic field lines.” - Alfvén, op cit, p.12.(Emphasis in original) Despite his warnings about this, astrophysicists persist in the notion that moving and interacting magnetic field lines – independent of any electrical current causality – produce the release of energy and plasma during solar flares. They have named this process ‘ reconnection’.

The standard explanation of reconnection is that magnetic field lines move and eventually come together (‘short-circuit’) at some point. There they change their structure (reconnect) and move apart. But magnetic field lines as such cannot move or touch each other. A compounding error is made in assuming that plasma is ‘attached’ to those lines and will be bulk transported by this movement of the lines. So in coming up with this novel hypothesis they have reinvented the wheel. But not only is this hypothesis an unnecessary ‘reinvention’, it is based on erroneous concepts and has no clarifying value.
Hannes Alfvén was explicit in his condemnation of the reconnecting concept:

"Of course there can be no magnetic merging energy transfer. Despite.. this, we have witnessed at the same time an enormously voluminous formalism building up based on this obviously erroneous concept.

I was naïve enough to believe that [magnetic reconnection] would die by itself in the scientific community, and I concentrated my work on more pleasant problems. To my great surprise the opposite has occurred: ‘merging’ … seems to be increasingly powerful. Magnetospheric physics and solar wind physics today are no doubt in a chaotic state, and a major reason for this is that part of the published papers are science and part pseudoscience, perhaps even with a majority in the latter group."

They have reinvented the wheel and done a bad job of it. If you are going to come up with an alternative explanation for something – at least get one that is defensible scientifically.

http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblo ... _wheel.htm

There is also a current discussion of the subject elsewhere on this forum here.