Inter-galactic space is filled with dark matter

[Goldminer]

Intergalactic space is filled with computer simulations? Cool!
Let me know when they actually DETECT some.

"Inference" & "Simulation" =/= "Observation" & "Detection"

~Michael Gmirkin

Not to mention the Gedankens of certain subsequent posters on this thread!

If the aether has Mass, what are the religious consequences. Should the Pope be notified about this?

Thought experiments have mass. This, and the computer simulations are the main source of dark matter!

[mpc755]

Intergalactic space is filled with computer simulations? Cool!
Let me know when they actually DETECT some.

"Inference" & "Simulation" =/= "Observation" & "Detection"

~Michael Gmirkin

Not to mention the Gedankens of certain subsequent posters on this thread!

If the aether has Mass, what are the religious consequences. Should the Pope be notified about this?

Thought experiments have mass. This, and the computer simulations are the main source of dark matter!

"Einstein's 'First Paper'"
http://www.worldscibooks.com/etextbook/ ... _chap1.pdf

"The velocity of a wave is proportional to the square root of the elastic forces which cause [its] propagation, and inversely proportional to the mass of the aether moved by these forces."

The velocity of a wave is proportional to the square root of the elastic forces which cause its propagation, and inversely proportional to the mass of the aether displaced by these forces.

[Goldminer]

Intergalactic space is filled with computer simulations? Cool!
Let me know when they actually DETECT some.

"Inference" & "Simulation" =/= "Observation" & "Detection"

~Michael Gmirkin

Not to mention the Gedankens of certain subsequent posters on this thread!

If the aether has Mass, what are the religious consequences. Should the Pope be notified about this?

Thought experiments have mass. This, and the computer simulations are the main source of dark matter!

"Einstein's 'First Paper'"
http://www.worldscibooks.com/etextbook/ ... _chap1.pdf

"The velocity of a wave is proportional to the square root of the elastic forces which cause [its] propagation, and inversely proportional to the mass of the aether moved by these forces."

The velocity of a wave is proportional to the square root of the elastic forces which cause its propagation, and inversely proportional to the mass of the aether displaced by these forces.

Thanks, the pdf is very interesting!

And yes, we should always take Albert as the final word on everything! . . . Albert would not agree with that!

During this year in Aarau came to me the question: If one follows a light beam
with the speed of light, then one would obtain a time-indepedent wave field.However,
such a thing does not exist!

Actually such a thing would exist, It's just that one would be riding the wave itself, and nothing about the field would wave. The energy of the said wave, and its vibration, is (would be) red shifted to a stop.

With respect to your highlighted quote: There are several points of view here. Albert is trying to understand matter's propensity to resist acceleration. In other words" inertia." To my mind, mass is a property of matter. To attribute that property (mass) to the aether too, is to double the effect, or divide it between matter and the aether. Either way you have complicated the issue.

Albert attributes the resistance to motion to matter, in other words, he thinks that the faster mass moves, the greater its resistance to acceleration. In the same breath, he insists that all motion is relative, meaning that from the fast moving matter's point of view, said fast moving matter can "assume" itself to be at rest, thus increasing the rest of the Universe's inertia! Yet another paradox.

So, what does the crazy Goldminer think happens? I think mass is a property of matter. Inertia is a property of the aether, as well as the aether's ability to conduct the rays of light waves away from their source at the speed of light. These properties of the aether have nothing to do with the aether having mass. If the aether has mass, get some and weigh it with Earth's gravitational acceleration!

[mpc755]

With respect to your highlighted quote: There are several points of view here. Albert is trying to understand matter's propensity to resist acceleration. In other words" inertia." To my mind, mass is a property of matter. To attribute that property (mass) to the aether too, is to double the effect, or divide it between matter and the aether. Either way you have complicated the issue.

I not only have simplified the issue I have figured out what non-baryonic dark matter and dark energy are and have figured out what causes gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit experiment.

What is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

This is what Voyager found evidence of.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/de ... yager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid.

The galaxy clusters in the following article are not traveling with dark matter. The galaxy clusters are moving through the aether. The galaxy clusters displace the aether.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubbl ... ature.html

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."

The 'pond' consists of aether. The 'ripple' is an aether displacement wave.

The above is physical evidence of a moving 'particle' having an associated aether displacement wave.

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE'
http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

"any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous “energetic contact” with a hidden medium"

The hidden medium is the aether. The "energetic contact" is the state of displacement of the aether.

'A quantum take on certainty'
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110602/ ... 1.344.html

"Intriguingly, the trajectories closely match those predicted by an unconventional interpretation of quantum mechanics known as pilot-wave theory, in which each particle has a well-defined trajectory that takes it through one slit while the associated wave passes through both slits."

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave.

In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined trajectory which takes it through one slit. The associated aether wave passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Detecting the particle strongly exiting a single slit turns the associated aether wave into chop. The aether waves exiting the slits interact with the detectors and become many short waves with irregular motion. The waves become disorderly. The waves are disorganized. There is no wave interference. The particle pitches and rolls through the chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop and it no longer creates an interference pattern.

'Was the universe born spinning?'
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/46688

"The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis"

The Universe spins around a preferred axis because the Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet; analogous to the polar jet of a black hole.

'Mysterious Cosmic 'Dark Flow' Tracked Deeper into Universe'
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/new ... 0-023.html

'The clusters appear to be moving along a line extending from our solar system toward Centaurus/Hydra, but the direction of this motion is less certain. Evidence indicates that the clusters are headed outward along this path, away from Earth, but the team cannot yet rule out the opposite flow. "We detect motion along this axis, but right now our data cannot state as strongly as we'd like whether the clusters are coming or going," Kashlinsky said.'

The clusters are headed along this path because the Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet.

The following is an image analogous of the Universal jet.

http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html

The reason for the 'expansion' of the universe is the continual emission of aether into the Universal jet. Three dimensional space associated with the Universe itself is not expanding. What we see in our telescopes is the matter associated with the Universe moving outward and away from the Universal jet emission point. In the image above, '1st Stars' is where the increase in pressure caused by the aether continually being emitted into the Universal jet causes the aether to condense into matter.

The following is an image analogous of the Universe, or the local Universe, we exist in.

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/planetarium/g ... ckHole.jpg

The following is an image analogous of the Universal spin.

http://i.space.com/images/i/612/i02/040 ... 1292259454

Dark flow is the aether emitted into the Universal jet. Dark energy is the change in state of the aether emitted into the Universal jet.

It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing.

[Goldminer]

Dark flow is the aether emitted into the Universal jet.Dark energy is the change in state of the aether emitted into the Universal jet.

Exactly what Earth and vicinity bound observations/experiments have ever evidenced motion of the aether? None to my knowledge. Dark flow is just another fantasy of the conventional wisdom! Dark flow=nocturnal emission.

Your number of re-posts does not increase your creditability. Nor do they cause me to reject the reality that I understand. You don't seem to engage in other's discussion much, and your claims to higher understanding are not reinforced with evidence of such understanding, IMHO.

In other words, if there is error in someone else's reasoning or evidence, show them where they have it wrong. You may gain from the interaction! Just telling them they are wrong and continuing with your own agenda is quite monotonous and not the purpose of this forum.

Having an agenda is not the problem, shoving it down others throats is.

[mpc755]

Dark flow is the aether emitted into the Universal jet.Dark energy is the change in state of the aether emitted into the Universal jet.

Exactly what Earth and vicinity bound observations/experiments have ever evidenced motion of the aether? None to my knowledge. Dark flow is just another fantasy of the conventional wisdom! Dark flow=nocturnal emission.

Your number of re-posts does not increase your creditability. Nor do they cause me to reject the reality that I understand. You don't seem to engage in other's discussion much, and your claims to higher understanding are not reinforced with evidence of such understanding, IMHO.

In other words, if there is error in someone else's reasoning or evidence, show them where they have it wrong. You may gain from the interaction! Just telling them they are wrong and continuing with your own agenda is quite monotonous and not the purpose of this forum.

Having an agenda is not the problem, shoving it down others throats is.

The following statement of yours suggests you do not believe in the existence of dark matter.

"Thought experiments have mass. This, and the computer simulations are the main source of dark matter!"

I am explaining to you that what is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Aether has mass.

There has never been an experiment performed which refutes the state of the aether as determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

Watch the following video starting at 0:45 to see a visual representation of the state of the aether. What is referred to as a twist in spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether. What is referred to as frame-dragging is the state of displacement of the aether.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9ITt44-EHE

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity - Albert Einstein'
http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the ether as determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the ether.

You would gain a correct understanding of the physics of nature if you were able to understand aether has mass and aether is physically displaced by matter. From this it is easily understood displaced aether pushing back toward matter is gravity and in a double slit experiment the particle has a well defined trajectory which takes it through one slit while the associated aether displacement wave passes through both.

[Goldminer]

Dark flow is the aether emitted into the Universal jet.Dark energy is the change in state of the aether emitted into the Universal jet.

Exactly what Earth and vicinity bound observations/experiments have ever evidenced motion of the aether? None to my knowledge. Dark flow is just another fantasy of the conventional wisdom! Dark flow=nocturnal emission.

Your number of re-posts does not increase your creditability. Nor do they cause me to reject the reality that I understand. You don't seem to engage in other's discussion much, and your claims to higher understanding are not reinforced with evidence of such understanding, IMHO.

In other words, if there is error in someone else's reasoning or evidence, show them where they have it wrong. You may gain from the interaction! Just telling them they are wrong and continuing with your own agenda is quite monotonous and not the purpose of this forum.

Having an agenda is not the problem, shoving it down others throats is.

The following statement of yours suggests you do not believe in the existence of dark matter

"Thought experiments have mass. This, and the computer simulations are the main source of dark matter!"

As the dairyman, contemplating his constipated cow, muttered: No shi!

I am explaining to you that what is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Aether has mass.

There has never been an experiment performed which refutes the state of the aether as determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

Watch the following video starting at 0:45 to see a visual representation of the state of the aether. What is referred to as a twist in spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether. What is referred to as frame-dragging is the state of displacement of the aether.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9ITt44-EHE

The result of the gravity probe B experiment was that they found nothing! Go to the gravity probe B thread here on the Tbolt forum.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity - Albert Einstein'
http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the ether as determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the ether.
You would gain a correct understanding of the physics of nature if you were able to understand aether has mass and aether is physically displaced by matter. From this it is easily understood displaced aether pushing back toward matter is gravity and in a double slit experiment the particle has a well defined trajectory which takes it through one slit while the associated aether displacement wave passes through both.

Quoting Alfred Einstein stating his opinion about what the ether does and doesn't do is not an experiment nor is it evidence other than what Albert himself thinks! My logic and understanding has ruled your "correct understanding of nature" to be merely your opinion. As such it may or may not rate "up" there with Albert's opinion.

"Up" being a relative term.

[mpc755]

The following statement of yours suggests you do not believe in the existence of dark matter

"Thought experiments have mass. This, and the computer simulations are the main source of dark matter!"

As the dairyman, contemplating his constipated cow, muttered: No shi!

You are insisting there is no such thing as dark matter. I am explaining to you what is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.

Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter.

This is what Voyager found evidence of.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/de ... yager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

If you choose not to understand this then that is your choice.

What the computer simulations in the following article are evidence of is aether.

'Missing dark matter located - Inter-galactic space is filled with dark matter'
http://www.ipmu.jp/node/1222

"Galaxies have no definite "edges", the new research concludes. Instead galaxies have long outskirts of dark matter that extend to their nearby galaxies; the inter-galactic space is not empty but filled with dark matter."

It's called aether and it has mass.

If you choose not to understand this then that is your choice.

[Goldminer]

The following statement of yours suggests you do not believe in the existence of dark matter

"Thought experiments have mass. This, and the computer simulations are the main source of dark matter!"

As the dairyman, contemplating his constipated cow, muttered: No shi!

You are insisting there is no such thing as dark matter. I am explaining to you what is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.

Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter.

This is what Voyager found evidence of.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/de ... yager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

If you choose not to understand this then that is your choice.

They didn't say it was aether pushing back, you put the words in their mouf. This is an unsanitary practice of yours. I hope they are offended.

What the computer simulations in the following article are evidence of is aether.

'Missing dark matter located - Inter-galactic space is filled with dark matter'
http://www.ipmu.jp/node/1222

"Galaxies have no definite "edges", the new research concludes. Instead galaxies have long outskirts of dark matter that extend to their nearby galaxies; the inter-galactic space is not empty but filled with dark matter."

It's called aether and it has mass.

If you choose not to understand this then that is your choice.

They didn't say it was the aether, you put the words in their mouf. This is an unsanitary practice of yours. I hope they are offended.

Please give me some credit! I absolutely do understand what you are saying, I just don't see the logic of it.

[mpc755]

The following statement of yours suggests you do not believe in the existence of dark matter

"Thought experiments have mass. This, and the computer simulations are the main source of dark matter!"

As the dairyman, contemplating his constipated cow, muttered: No shi!

You are insisting there is no such thing as dark matter. I am explaining to you what is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.

Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter.

This is what Voyager found evidence of.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/de ... yager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

If you choose not to understand this then that is your choice.

They didn't say it was aether pushing back, you put the words in their mouf. This is an unsanitary practice of yours. I hope they are offended.

I am explaining to you what it is which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

If you choose not to understand it is the aether which is displaced by the solar system which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system then that is your choice.

What the computer simulations in the following article are evidence of is aether.

'Missing dark matter located - Inter-galactic space is filled with dark matter'
http://www.ipmu.jp/node/1222

"Galaxies have no definite "edges", the new research concludes. Instead galaxies have long outskirts of dark matter that extend to their nearby galaxies; the inter-galactic space is not empty but filled with dark matter."

It's called aether and it has mass.

If you choose not to understand this then that is your choice.

They didn't say it was the aether, you put the words in their mouf. This is an unsanitary practice of yours. I hope they are offended.

Please give me some credit! I absolutely do understand what you are saying, I just don't see the logic of it.

I am explaining to you what is postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Aether has mass. Aether fills empty space. If you choose not to understand the correctness of this then that is your choice.

[Goldminer]

Please give me some credit! I absolutely do understand what you are saying, I just don't see the logic of it.

I am explaining to you what is postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Aether has mass. Aether fills empty space. If you choose not to understand the correctness of this then that is your choice.

It's not a matter of me not understanding. It is a matter you and who else understands you opinion as undisputed reality?? I understand that aether fills "empty space." I also understand that individual atoms are mostly empty space. So the inside if atoms are also filled with aether! So how is aether displaced?

I also understand that the postulated "dark matter" is just another addition to all the other fictions needed to keep the consensus theory/religion from dying. It is not needed to keep galaxies together when well known forces already supply the needed action. So your "explanation" is superfluous. But you have my blessings to go on thinking that you know it all!

[mpc755]

I also understand that individual atoms are mostly empty space. So the inside if atoms are also filled with aether! So how is aether displaced?

Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether has been displaced. Displaced aether pushes back toward the matter. Displaced aether pushing back and exerting pressure toward matter is gravity.

[Goldminer]

It's not a matter of me not understanding. It is a matter you and who else understands you opinion as undisputed reality??

[mpc755]

It's not a matter of me not understanding. It is a matter you and who else understands you opinion as undisputed reality??

What is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

This is what Voyager found evidence of.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/de ... yager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid.

The galaxy clusters in the following article are not traveling with dark matter. The galaxy clusters are moving through the aether. The galaxy clusters displace the aether.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubbl ... ature.html

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."

The 'pond' consists of aether. The 'ripple' is an aether displacement wave.

The above is physical evidence of a moving 'particle' having an associated aether displacement wave.

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE'
http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

"any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous “energetic contact” with a hidden medium"

The hidden medium is the aether. The "energetic contact" is the state of displacement of the aether.

'A quantum take on certainty'
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110602/ ... 1.344.html

"Intriguingly, the trajectories closely match those predicted by an unconventional interpretation of quantum mechanics known as pilot-wave theory, in which each particle has a well-defined trajectory that takes it through one slit while the associated wave passes through both slits."

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave.

In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined trajectory which takes it through one slit. The associated aether wave passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Detecting the particle strongly exiting a single slit turns the associated aether wave into chop. The aether waves exiting the slits interact with the detectors and become many short waves with irregular motion. The waves become disorderly. The waves are disorganized. There is no wave interference. The particle pitches and rolls through the chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop and it no longer creates an interference pattern.

If you choose not to understand the above correctly describes the physics of nature then that is your choice.

[Goldminer]

It's not a matter of me not understanding. It is a matter you and who else understands you opinion as undisputed reality??

My comment here was posted in error. Sorry.

You insist that the aether has to have mass to vibrate. It doesn't. If it has mass then it has to have position. In other words, the motion of the aether should be detectable. The motion of the aether is not detectable. Gravity probe B detected nothing. Einsteinians interpret this as "frame dragging." If there is frame dragging then all observations of light from outside Earth's distorted frame should be distorted. They are not. Positions of stars viewed transverse to Earth's motion are aberrated. Others are not.

The particulate theory of light explains fewer observations than the wave theory. If light waves were turned into chop, a pinhole camera could not produce a picture. Laser light passing a needle point does produce interference. These observations do not need a pilot wave. The pilot wave has to travel faster than light. Not only that, it has to travel from the detector to the source. Good luck with that.

The Voyager anomaly is about the voyager not being where it is calculated as being. It has to do with the way the latency of the signals to and from the voyager are calculated rather than any slowing of its velocity.

Hubble didn't find a ghostly ring of dark matter. These folk see what they want to see according to their religion. The ring has better explanations.