Researchers at IPMU and Nagoya University used large-scale computer simulations and recent observational data of gravitational lensing to reveal how dark matter is distributed around galaxies.
mharratsc wrote:Researchers at IPMU and Nagoya University used large-scale computer simulations and recent observational data of gravitational lensing to reveal how dark matter is distributed around galaxies.
I don't particularly disagree with you, bud... but I wouldn't take anything these guys said to the bank, if I were you. :\
MGmirkin wrote:Intergalactic space is filled with computer simulations? Cool!
Let me know when they actually DETECT some.
"Inference" & "Simulation" =/= "Observation" & "Detection"
~Michael Gmirkin
mpc755 wrote:What is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.
Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.
tayga wrote:mpc755 wrote:What is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.
Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.
Who is "presently postulating" this and what is the justification for these assertions?
quantauniverse wrote:Masaki does not say the aether exists, it is contrary to big-bang theory.
quantauniverse wrote:The flat zone of avoidance conceals only 10% of our sky view, but contains 90% of the large-scale structures, that are obscured by our galaxy's dusty plane. Our galaxy's north magnetic pole is aligned with our local group and virgo supercluster, showing how entire superclusters and hyperclusters are being unknowingly obscured at vast distances from us. The cosmic dipole contains a magnetic field having electric currents that attracts dust and gas to filaments without dark matter components. The fine-structure constant has been shown to vary, and align with the dark flow, which is a Birkeland pinch about 150 billion light years away, not a singularity. Scientists found the dark flow aligns with the varying fine-structure constant, and not at all with the CMB. With scales so vast, it seems reasonable that fractal EM transitory phenomena lacking inherent existence form ever larger and smaller sized structures in the universe, and that plasma, EM, or Electric Universe cosmology better explains away the need for a beginning nor end of time then that presented in the mystery beginning of the big-bang. The aether is not an entity in itself but likely a sub-quantum superstate structure, based on spin or analogous orbit. No ultimate small or large structure eternally exists. If there was a beginning from nothing then first the universe would start spinning and from there arises everything as electromagnetic phenomena
http://holographicgalaxy.blogspot.com
Julian Braggins wrote:From this article it would seem that some gravitational lensing is now being interpreted as caused by wandering planets.
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/febr ... 22312.html
This makes more sense than undefined 'Dark Matter" if it turns out to be true, possible numbers suggested are staggering, and would mean revision of the likelihood of capture of wandering bodies by star systems.
Julian Braggins wrote:Re -Post by mpc755 » Fri Feb 24, 2012 2:48 pm,
You might be interested in Miles Mathis's new paper on "The Heliospheric Current Sheet" 2/21/2012
http://www.milesmathis.com/updates.html
in which he equates aether to çharge. Reading his other two papers on "ether" will clear up his ideas on it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest