So does this mean you have no idea of the physics, of why you think star light might brighten in our atmosphere, more than what we would see in space?
.By my spin equation, an electron that loses more than two spin levels actually
becomes a photon. That is simply what we call a particle with that number of spins. The electron
doesn't contain the photon, like our glass jar with photons inside. An electron simply IS a photon with extra spins. We call a photon with two extra spins an electron, and a photon with six extra spins is a proton or neutron
So yes, I do believe that we will not see stars, or will see very few stars by eye
from outside of the ionosphere, except by looking through the ionosphere.
GaryN wrote:@fosbornSo does this mean you have no idea of the physics, of why you think star light might brighten in our atmosphere, more than what we would see in space?
Well, I wouldn't say no idea, but but not the overall mechanism. Miles Mathis may have
the answer with his ideas on spin.
GaryN wrote:So yes, I do believe that we will not see stars, or will see very few stars by eye
from outside of the ionosphere, except by looking through the ionosphere.
http://i.imgur.com/x4gZX.jpg
Does this visual amplification of light apply only to stars? Would Mars be dimmer also?
Fosborn said: do you know of any physics that can explain how starlight can amplify itself in our atmosphere?
Lloyd wrote:Fosborn said: do you know of any physics that can explain how starlight can amplify itself in our atmosphere?
* No. What evidence is there that the atmosphere amplifies starlight? There's not much atmosphere above 400 km, is there?
* I can imagine the possibility that atmospheres magnify images, because atmospheres are spheres and glass spheres amplify images, so maybe air spheres could do so somewhat similarly.
GaryN » Fri May 27, 2011 2:07 am I wasn't saying amplification Frank, but a change in the property of the
light due to something happening in the ionosphere. I have a lot to learn,
or try and learn, and at the moment I have much else that I should be doing.
I was just looking into how, maybe, distant plane waves arriving outside the
ionosphere, and the way that the eye works, may result in total, or at least
a very high order, of destructive interference, so we can not see anything!
The ionosphere somehow restores things so we are able to see them again, but
I don't think I'll ever have time to get into the details, or at least not until
later in the year.
D_Archer wrote:Hi Gary,
A possibility could be that the photon picks up some energy from the ionosphere! This would restore some of its lost energy from the long travel. Thereby brightening for a clearer picture here on earth.
For some good conceptions of what light actually is/does, Miles Mathis has some clear understandings >
Why do Stars Twinkle? > http://milesmathis.com/twink.html
The THEORY of TIRED LIGHT, why wrong why right > http://www.milesmathis.com/tired.pdf
Regards,
Daniel
fosborn_ wrote:D_Archer wrote:Hi Gary,
A possibility could be that the photon picks up some energy from the ionosphere! This would restore some of its lost energy from the long travel. Thereby brightening for a clearer picture here on earth.
For some good conceptions of what light actually is/does, Miles Mathis has some clear understandings >
Why do Stars Twinkle? > http://milesmathis.com/twink.html
The THEORY of TIRED LIGHT, why wrong why right > http://www.milesmathis.com/tired.pdf
Regards,
Daniel
So you are saying star light is actually vary bright as it starts out and tires out, then re aquires it orignal energies. So the end result is we are actualy seeing the stars true brightness?
Return to New Insights and Mad Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests