Rogue Planets - Nemesis, Planet X, Tyche ....

Historic planetary instability and catastrophe. Evidence for electrical scarring on planets and moons. Electrical events in today's solar system. Electric Earth.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Re: [Article] A search for planet Tyche?

Unread postby Dotini » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:32 pm

zour wrote:I am surprised that the mainstream science is actually looking after this planet:


I don't think the scientists involved are mainstream, and the WISE project is shut down. But this doesn't address your other questions.

Respectfully,
Dotini
Dotini
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:44 am
Location: Seattle

Re: [Article] A search for planet Tyche?

Unread postby Sparky » Tue Feb 22, 2011 6:17 pm

for mass extinction info. search in TPODS...

http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/00archive.htm
"It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
Sparky
 
Posts: 3517
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:20 pm

Re: Search on for Nemesis

Unread postby nick c » Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:14 am

This thread is a merger of the following threads:

[Article] A search for planet Tyche?

Search on for Nemesis

Giant Stealth Planet

Planet X - Brown Dwarf?
User avatar
nick c
Moderator
 
Posts: 2471
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: connecticut

Re: Rogue Planets - Nemesis, Planet X, Tyche ....

Unread postby Lloyd » Sun Apr 24, 2011 4:44 pm

Comet Elenin Cataclysms?
* I'm just cross-referencing this. Komorikid mentioned this interesting video http://www.youtube.com/user/markinportland2008#p/u/3/RnG8Pa0u-4U on the Comet Elenin thread yesterday.
* The video suggests that the comet may actually be a brown dwarf star, although I don't know of any evidence of that. The evidence that the video does show is that Comet Elenin apparently triggered solar flares when it aligned with Earth and the Sun 3 different times and the solar flares then caused major earthquakes each time, first in Chile, then New Zealand and finally Japan. The next alignments will be on Sep. 27 and Nov. 5 and the next earthquake may occur in California, if the pattern continues. Earth may also encounter cometary debris starting around Oct. 17.
Lloyd
 
Posts: 4409
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:54 pm

Re: Rogue Planets - Nemesis, Planet X, Tyche ....

Unread postby Komorikid » Sat May 14, 2011 7:11 pm

Thanks for the cross reference LLoyd.
For those interested, Mike's latest YouTube vid is here

http://www.youtube.com/user/markinportland2008#p/u/0/Dmjdjf9SeFw

He has updated the alignments into consecutive dates for those who want to keep tabs its progress.
Fiction can't be proven. Fact can't be denied - Paul M
User avatar
Komorikid
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:45 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Are two giant planets lurking beyond Pluto?

Unread postby pavlink » Sun Jun 15, 2014 2:45 am

Are two giant planets lurking beyond Pluto? Unusual orbits spotted in the outer solar system hint at the presence of large worlds

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... orlds.html


Three more planets, orbiting the sun, beyond Pluto.
http://files.kostovi.com/wwt061353_155350cu.bmp
http://files.kostovi.com/wwt070153_411443cu.bmp
http://files.kostovi.com/wwt073256_512504cu.bmp
We live in a double star system.
We need to study double star systems.

Solar System as 4D energy vortex
http://files.kostovi.com/8835e.pdf
pavlink
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 7:14 am

Re: Are two giant planets lurking beyond Pluto?

Unread postby Sparky » Sun Jun 15, 2014 6:00 am

may be harbouring two supersized planet just out of reach of our telescopes.


We see images of very small rocks, why can't they calculate where the large planets should be and image that area? :?

If they can't find a gravitational reason for what they observe, then maybe they need to look for another cause. ;)
"It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
Sparky
 
Posts: 3517
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:20 pm

Re: Are two giant planets lurking beyond Pluto?

Unread postby Metryq » Sun Jun 15, 2014 2:32 pm

Sparky wrote:If they can't find a gravitational reason for what they observe, then maybe they need to look for another cause. ;)


Ultra-miniature black holes? Maybe there are clouds of Dark Matter hovering in the right place? How's that for "non-gravitational" explanations? A cosmic string? A "membrane" intersecting our universe just outside the Solar system!

"Brane and brane! What is brane?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zKDQfVbWqc
User avatar
Metryq
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:31 am

New 9th Planet Postulated

Unread postby Oliver Lightside » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:04 pm

Ten earth masses, 20 times farther away than Neptune, 10-20K yr orbital period, eccentric planet-reshuffling

orbit. Hmmm...

Recent analyses have shown that distant orbits within the scattered disk population of the Kuiper Belt

exhibit an unexpected clustering in their respective arguments of perihelion. While several hypotheses have

been put forward to explain this alignment, to date, a theoretical model that can successfully account for the

observations remains elusive. In this work we show that the orbits of distant Kuiper Belt objects (KBOs)

cluster not only in argument of perihelion, but also in physical space. We demonstrate that the perihelion

positions and orbital planes of the objects are tightly confined and that such a clustering has only a

probability of 0.007% to be due to chance, thus requiring a dynamical origin. We find that the observed orbital

alignment can be maintained by a distant eccentric planet with mass gsim10 m⊕ whose orbit lies in approximately

the same plane as those of the distant KBOs, but whose perihelion is 180° away from the perihelia of the minor

bodies. In addition to accounting for the observed orbital alignment, the existence of such a planet naturally

explains the presence of high-perihelion Sedna-like objects, as well as the known collection of high semimajor

axis objects with inclinations between 60° and 150° whose origin was previously unclear. Continued analysis of

both distant and highly inclined outer solar system objects provides the opportunity for testing our hypothesis

as well as further constraining the orbital elements and mass of the distant planet.


http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22

Here's a Washington Post article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/01/20/new-evidence-suggests-a-ninth-planet-lurking-at-the-edge-of-the-solar-system/
Oliver Lightside
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:10 am

Re: New 9th Planet Postulated

Unread postby Metryq » Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:43 am

Considering the wacky acrobatics of Pluto's satellites, is it possible an electrically-related explanation might explain both? If Sedna and company are "trojan point" or shepherded moons of a massive planet, one would think other sky surveys (IR?) might have found said planet by now.
User avatar
Metryq
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:31 am

Re: New 9th Planet Postulated

Unread postby seasmith » Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:08 pm

Qué ?
You didn't know that Nibiru's purloined golden atmosphere creates a global 'cloaking device' ?

http://media3.s-nbcnews.com/j/msnbc/Com ... id-6x2.jpg
seasmith
 
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: New 9th Planet Postulated

Unread postby pavlink » Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am

There are three more planets, orbiting the sun, beyond Pluto.
Closest a smaller than Earth rocky planet.
http://files.kostovi.com/wwt061353_155350cu.bmp

Further a Neptune like gas giant.
http://files.kostovi.com/wwt070153_411443cu.bmp

Biggest a Saturn like Gas giant.
http://files.kostovi.com/wwt073256_512504cu.bmp

Not to mix these up with the mother star.
http://www.sott.net/article/230480-Is-t ... ment136231
We live in a double star system.
We need to study double star systems.

Solar System as 4D energy vortex
http://files.kostovi.com/8835e.pdf
pavlink
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 7:14 am

Re: New 9th Planet Postulated

Unread postby nick c » Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:20 am

pavlink wrote:There are three more planets, orbiting the sun, beyond Pluto.
Closest a smaller than Earth rocky planet.
http://files.kostovi.com/wwt061353_155350cu.bmp

Further a Neptune like gas giant.
http://files.kostovi.com/wwt070153_411443cu.bmp

Biggest a Saturn like Gas giant.
http://files.kostovi.com/wwt073256_512504cu.bmp

These are remarkable claims. Do you have any real evidence of your supposed discovery? If so, you should become famous!
User avatar
nick c
Moderator
 
Posts: 2471
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: connecticut

Re: New 9th Planet Postulated

Unread postby celeste » Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:10 pm

Metryq wrote:Considering the wacky acrobatics of Pluto's satellites, is it possible an electrically-related explanation might explain both? If Sedna and company are "trojan point" or shepherded moons of a massive planet, one would think other sky surveys (IR?) might have found said planet by now.


Yes, there is an EU solution to this, and it has come up quite a while ago (before the mainstream even noticed the issue, or suggested it may be due to a gravitational long period binary.

First, notice that this independent researcher observed the relationship of perihelions some years ago.
http://www.binaryresearchinstitute.org/ ... arch.shtml it's tucked away as an afterthought in the last paragraph. Perihelions clustering in the direction of Sirius. What is more, that link is from the
Binary Research Institute. The head of that Institute (another person well outside the mainstream), was already positing an object in a 24,000yr orbit as a solution to this. In other words, this whole idea of these aligned orbits being caused by the gravitational pull of some long period binary is only "news" in the mainstream. Finally, notice that the orbit that the mainstream is looking for,has a highly inclined aphelion, and a very long period. In other words, what they are looking for is a planet that "hangs out" in a near polar configuration. Again, it is only new material for the mainstream.

Ironically, the reason those independent researchers failed, was because they tried to keep too much of the mainstream model, They were convinced that only gravitational forces could explain orbits. Therefore, they never bothered to note that Sirius merely marks the antapex of the sun's way along these filamentary "gas clouds"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_Int ... arrows.jpg

When we apply Donald Scott's model to these "gas clouds" we find that: 1. the more elliptical an orbit, the more inclined it should be. and 2. perihelion points should lag in the sun's direction of motion, while aphelion points lead.

Again, it's just sad to see:
Independent researchers make an interesting observation, and come up with a proposed solution. Nobody listens. Then years later, the mainstream comes up with the same observation (spatial correlation of perihelions), and proposes the same solution (object in tens of thousands of years orbit), and all of a sudden it's news splashed around the net.
celeste
 
Posts: 821
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:41 pm
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona

Previous

Return to Electric Universe - Planetary Science

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests