[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 384: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 1056: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3897)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4762: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3897)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4764: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3897)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4765: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3897)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4766: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3897)
Thunderbolts Forum • View topic - Ralph Sansbury's Model

Ralph Sansbury's Model

Has science taken a wrong turn? If so, what corrections are needed? Chronicles of scientific misbehavior. The role of heretic-pioneers and forbidden questions in the sciences. Is peer review working? The perverse "consensus of leading scientists." Good public relations versus good science.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Re: Ralph Sansbury's Model

Unread postby junglelord » Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:11 pm

If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Ralph Sansbury's Model

Unread postby Solar » Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:50 pm

"Our laws of force tend to be applied in the Newtonian sense in that for every action there is an equal reaction, and yet, in the real world, where many-body gravitational effects or electrodynamic actions prevail, we do not have every action paired with an equal reaction." — Harold Aspden
User avatar
Solar
 
Posts: 1339
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:05 am

Re: Ralph Sansbury's Model

Unread postby webolife » Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:58 pm

Interesting comments all. JL, who are Wilbur Smith's "they", classicists? relativists? The remainder of the Smith quote regarding time reminds me of a little experiment I got from "my "(Robert Archer) Smith: Take an eggtimer, tie a string around the full end, swing it around your head for a minute or more until the chamber has emptied. The egg is not done, and the twin paradox is undone! At nowhere near "relativistic speeds" time dilation "works" in reverse, as the 3-minute time period is cut in half! Not a fair trial, you protest? Einstein himself included hourglasses in his list of clocks that should obey the theory of relativity. Time dilation is simply not real. All other explanations presuppose the movement of light then circularly conclude [insert your alleged evidence here ] as proof. Einstein's "Problem of Simultaneity" enters here, as well as considerations of what must happen as huge amounts of energy are converted to moving a clock rapidly through/across an electrical vector field at whatever scale, and I don't think anyone has enough assumption-free evidence to conclude that light moves, let alone that relativistic time dilation effects are occurring.
Truth extends beyond the border of self-limiting science. Free discourse among opposing viewpoints draws the open-minded away from the darkness of inevitable bias and nearer to the light of universal reality.
User avatar
webolife
 
Posts: 2531
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:01 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Ralph Sansbury's Model

Unread postby junglelord » Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:39 pm

"They" are ET.
Wilbert Smith got his theory from Contactees...Who got it from ET.
But, that, is "They", and thats who "They" are, He also calls them "the boys upstairs"
:?
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Ralph Sansbury's Model

Unread postby Solar » Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:02 pm

"Our laws of force tend to be applied in the Newtonian sense in that for every action there is an equal reaction, and yet, in the real world, where many-body gravitational effects or electrodynamic actions prevail, we do not have every action paired with an equal reaction." — Harold Aspden
User avatar
Solar
 
Posts: 1339
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:05 am

Re: Ralph Sansbury's Model

Unread postby StevenO » Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:23 am

First, God decided he was lonely. Then it got out of hand. Now we have this mess called life...
The past is out of date. Start living your future. Align with your dreams. Now execute.
User avatar
StevenO
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 11:08 pm

Re: Ralph Sansbury's Model

Unread postby Solar » Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:25 pm

"Our laws of force tend to be applied in the Newtonian sense in that for every action there is an equal reaction, and yet, in the real world, where many-body gravitational effects or electrodynamic actions prevail, we do not have every action paired with an equal reaction." — Harold Aspden
User avatar
Solar
 
Posts: 1339
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:05 am

Re: Ralph Sansbury's Model

Unread postby lizzie » Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:52 pm

lizzie
Guest
 

Webolife and Rado on Aether

Unread postby Lloyd » Fri May 09, 2008 7:25 pm

- I just started reading this thread, so I'm returning to an earlier post in which Webolife said I have been trying for months to determine if an aether fits into "my" unified field theory, with no conclusive finding either way. Instantaneous light, gravitation, electrostatic field transmutation (eg a voltage drop), simply do not require an aether as a propagating medium.
- I don't know if you found the need for a propagating aether medium yet, but, as I just mentioned at another aether thread I think, Steve Rado was able to calculate the distance between adjacent aether particles using the sound frequency formula [Is it frequency x wavelength = distance?], which can be used to calculate the distance between adjacent atoms in a gas, liquid, or solid, and substituting the frequency of the highest known frequency gamma rays in place of the sound frequency. If he's right, then there can't be EM radiation without an aether, just as there can't be sound without a gas, liquid, or solid.
Lloyd
 
Posts: 4366
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:54 pm

Re: Ralph Sansbury's Model

Unread postby junglelord » Sat May 10, 2008 4:37 am

If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Why do transverse dipoles attract/repel?

Unread postby trevbus » Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:41 am

Attachments
Sansbury's theory - Dipole arrangement in a cross-section of current-conducting wire.gif
What causes the dipole arrangement to be attractive when currents are in the same direction in parallel current-conducting wires?
Sansbury's theory - Dipole arrangement in a cross-section of current-conducting wire.gif (6.62 KiB) Viewed 11049 times
trevbus
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:50 am

Re: Why do transverse dipoles attract/repel?

Unread postby trevbus » Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:06 am

trevbus
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:50 am

Examination of possible dipole orientations

Unread postby trevbus » Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:48 am

Here are a number of possible transverse dipole orientations in cross-sections of current-carrying wires.

You can see that charge imbalances would arise unless the dipoles were arranged in a counter-clockwise or clockwise manner.

One question is why the orientation would not be incoherent - random. This would avoid large-scale charge imbalances, but would cause local imbalances, suggesting it would resolve into a more stable orientation.

The remaining question is why the orientation would be clockwise or counter-clockwise. This would seem to depend on the direction of motion of the electrons, meaning the Right Hand Rule is a consequence of the direction that subtrons orbit each other.
Attachments
Sansbury's theory - Dipole arrangements in a cross-section of current-conducting wire.gif
Only certain dipole orientations avoid charge imbalances. It seems likely that only random, clockwise and counter-clockwise orientations would avoid charge imbalance.
trevbus
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:50 am

Re: Examination of possible dipole orientations

Unread postby trevbus » Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:11 pm

But a magnetic field must be exhibited by a sole moving charged electron. Hence it is not a collective effect.

One such arrangement would involve the dipole rotating off-center: Imagine a record on a turntable. Draw a straight line across part of the edge, say between 12 o'clock and 1 o'clock. Mark 12 o'clock positive and 1 o'clock negative.

Now as the record turns, the dipole is closest to you when the +ve charge is to your right and the -ve charge is to your left. When it is furthest away (ie weaker), the opposite is the case.

If the record turns fast, the next effect is a dipole which, no matter where you stand, always has +ve to your right and -ve to your left.

This would be an elegant explanation of magnetism.

Though it does require a rather sophisticated orbital dynamic to achieve an off-centre dipole. Perhaps it could be achieved with multiple eliptical orbits. But why would this complex arrangement arise naturally? And why only when the particle is in motion?
trevbus
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:50 am

Re: Ralph Sansbury's Model

Unread postby bdw000 » Thu Nov 27, 2008 9:09 pm

bdw000
 
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:06 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Future of Science

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests