Ralph Sansbury's Model

Has science taken a wrong turn? If so, what corrections are needed? Chronicles of scientific misbehavior. The role of heretic-pioneers and forbidden questions in the sciences. Is peer review working? The perverse "consensus of leading scientists." Good public relations versus good science.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Re: Ralph Sansbury's Model

Unread postby junglelord » Fri Nov 28, 2008 9:20 am

Stephen always knows his stuff. His post was a Red Flag. Both Sansbury and Wal Thornhill need to reconsider the experiment in this light.

I remain positive that the electron is the final and fundamental level of matter.
Aether behind it, not subtrons.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Ralph Sansbury's Model

Unread postby edcrater » Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:50 am

bdw000 wrote:No one else has ever tried to repeat this experiment? Has anyone here ever heard of someone else doing the same experiment?


Apparently Sansbury published in 1998. It's said it was 'a thousand dollar experiment'. It reads as if once set up, it could be done 10x an hour, indefinitely. Above all, it looks easy if you're familiar with the kit, so why not do it? Can it really be true that in the 10 years that have elapsed, no-one has repeated it? Or tried and failed?

After all, there could be money, kudos, fame, Nobel prizes, young ladies beating a path to your door, whatever, in it for you.

I've googled and looked at bautforum, but can find nothing pertinent or sensible. Wouldn't one expect in this scenario to see endless debate between Sansbury and his supporters and critics?

This sounds highly suspicious. Isn't it more likely that it has been done, and the results kept under wraps for some nefarious purpose?
User avatar
edcrater
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:57 am
Location: Limerick, Ire.

Re: Ralph Sansbury's Model

Unread postby bboyer » Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:55 am

edcrater wrote:
bdw000 wrote:<snip>
I've googled and looked at bautforum, but can find nothing pertinent or sensible. Wouldn't one expect in this scenario to see endless debate between Sansbury and his supporters and critics?

<snip>


There was considerable debate; Google the usenet newsgroups. See this post, viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1092&p=14103&hilit=sansbury#p14103.
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. — Maitri Upanishad
User avatar
bboyer
 
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: Ralph Sansbury's Model

Unread postby edcrater » Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:09 am

arc-us wrote:There was considerable debate; Google the usenet newsgroups. See this post, viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1092&p=14103&hilit=sansbury#p14103.


Ah. Many thanks; working on it.
User avatar
edcrater
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:57 am
Location: Limerick, Ire.

Previous

Return to The Future of Science

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests