Thanx for that info, i will work my way throo it.Sandokhan wrote:Here is the experimental data published by Michelson in 1925:
https://i.ibb.co/D88Br8N/mgx.jpg
Unbelievably, the fringe shifts show no rotation of the Earth at all (0.00 fringe displacement).
This is the main reason why Michelson inserted this observation data on page 6 (in the acknowledgments section), away from the main discussion, in order to attract as little attention to it as possible.
Now, heliocentrists will immediately rely on the HAMMAR experiment (1935) to dismiss the ether theory, that is why one needs my SAGNAC EFFECT formula to debunk this erroneous argument:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg2031383
What Michelson did is to SUBSTITUTE the CORIOLIS EFFECT formula for the SAGNAC EFFECT equation:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg2117351
Correct SAGNAC EFFECT formula for ring laser gyroscopes:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg2153966
If i follow proper, u are saying that the coriolis equation is identical to the historic sagnac equation.Sandokhan wrote:.........E. J. Post is the only person to notice the substantial identity between the 1925 experiment and that of 1887: "To avoid possible confusion, it may be remarked that the beam path in the more well-known Michelson-Morley interferometer, which was mounted on a turntable, does not enclose a finite surface area; therefore no fringe shift can be expected as a result of a uniform rotation of the latter".
E. J. Post, Reviews of Modern Physics. Vol. 39, n. 2, April 1967
A. Michelson and E. Morley SIMPLY MEASURED THE CORIOLIS EFFECT OF THE ETHER DRIFT. Since they did not use a phase-conjugate mirror or a fiber optic equipment, the Coriolis force effects ("attractive" and "repulsive") upon the light offset each other.
The positive (slight deviations) from the null result are due to a residual surface enclosed by the multiple path beam (the Coriolis effect registered by a Sagnac interferometer). Dayton Miller also measured the Coriolis effect of the ether drift in his experiment (Mount Wilson, 1921-1924 and 1925-1926, and Cleveland, 1922-1924).
Michelson repeated his error in the Michelson-Gale experiment, where he used the WRONG formula (Michelson and Gale actually recorded the CORIOLIS EFFECT and not the Sagnac effect). Hammar also committed the same error.
Sandokhan wrote:the magnetic field is comprised of TWO streams of particles, both N - S and S - N.
The crucial point is this: a Sagnac interferometer can detect/record/register BOTH the CORIOLIS EFFECT and the SAGNAC EFFECT (which is much larger than the Coriolis effect on the light beams).
That is, there are TWO formulas which have to be derived.
An orbiting Earth needs BOTH the CORIOLIS EFFECT and the SAGNAC EFFECT to be recorded during the experiment, in order to claim rotation.
A stationary Earth needs only the CORIOLIS EFFECT to be registered (the ether drift effect on the light beams).
Michelson detected only the CORIOLIS EFFECT.
Because the charge field is different north and south, we would expect vortices to be different north and south. And this would apply to vortices of every size, large and small. Since the curves are not caused by position or by Coriolis pseudo-forces, there is no need to explain the vortices by lots of difficult math. Magnetism is caused by a real spin of a photon, so we can explain angular momenta all the way down to the size of a photon. Small vortices give us no theoretical problem.
Since the charge field is rotating one direction and not the other, one path of light will be going with
that field and one will be going against it. Since the charge field is real, it will cause real photon
collisions. The light going against the charge field will have to take a longer path. And so we have the
Sagnac effect.
once we give the ether a real presence, as with my charge field made up of real photons, the disproof of the Sagnac Effect becomes proof.
Sandokhan wrote:Well photons have spin, they all spin the same direction, but some are upside down to others (in the field) and can be called anti-photons, anti photons go in at the north-pole (mostly), and photons go in at the south-pole (mostly), so the streams out of the Earth are both photons and anti-photons.
No.
The flux/stream of particles consists of SUBQUARKS: laevorotatory and dextrorotatory, the actual magnetic monopoles. Bosons travel longitudinally through these subquarks.
In the ether quantum theory, photons = bosons = neutrinos.
Return to New Insights and Mad Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests