[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 1056: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3897)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4762: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3897)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4764: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3897)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4765: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3897)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4766: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3897)
Thunderbolts Forum • View topic - Lambda-CDM - EU/PC Theory - Confirmation Bias

Lambda-CDM - EU/PC Theory - Confirmation Bias

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Re: Lambda-CDM - EU/PC Theory - Confirmation Bias

Unread postby JHL » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:39 am

I think your elaboration and lucidity are exceptional, Michael. This being the public background record of what will eventually become a new paradigm, your work will occupy a prominent defining place. I always look forward to it.

(I emphasize the stunning effort undertaken by the EU community and hope to apply suitable emphasis where warranted. ;o)
JHL
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:11 pm

Surpise - Another dark matter failure.

Unread postby Michael Mozina » Thu Jan 24, 2019 9:48 am

Michael Mozina
 
Posts: 1692
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA

More evidence that their luminosity techniques are flawed...

Unread postby Michael Mozina » Thu Jan 24, 2019 10:16 am

Michael Mozina
 
Posts: 1692
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA

It's scientifically impossible to prove a negative.

Unread postby Michael Mozina » Thu Jan 24, 2019 11:14 am

Keep in mind that is scientifically and logically impossible to prove a negative. Nobody can prove that invisible unicorns do not exist, nor prove that monopoles do not exist. It's impossible to disprove any claim. It is therefore the scientific responsibility of the proponent of the idea to provide sufficient and reliable evidence to support their claim. It is not the responsibility of the skeptic to disprove any claim.

The best that any skeptic could ever hope to do is demonstrate that the null hypothesis has a better track record of predicting the outcome of ever more sensitive laboratory 'tests" of the claim which is certainly true in the case of exotic matter. Exotic matter models have failed every single laboratory test to date, including billions of dollars worth of tests at LHC, and many other multi-million dollar tests as well, whereas the null hypothesis has passed every single one of those very expensive tests with flying colors.

In a perfect scenario, a skeptic might also be able to demonstrate that there are serious errors in the so called "evidence" that has been presented to support the claim. That has also happened in this thread with respect to exotic matter claims which are entirely predicated upon the correct estimation of baryonic mass based on luminosity. Those luminosity mass estimation techniques have been repeatedly shown to be riddled with serious and numerous problems, problems which completely undermine the entire claim.

There's literally nothing more that can be asked of the skeptic than has been presented in this thread with respect to dark matter. Not only has the null hypothesis batted 1000 with respect to all controlled laboratory experiments over the last several decades, there is also ample observational evidence presented in this thread to demonstrate that the mainstream baryonic mass estimation techniques which are used to estimate the amount of ordinary mass in distant galaxies based upon their luminosity are riddled with important and serious flaws which completely undermine the evidence for exotic matter.

There's nothing more that any skeptic could ever hope to do than what has already been done. There's absolutely, positively zero laboratory support of exotic matter, and there is zero *valid* observational support of that concept which holds up to any serious scientific scrutiny.

The fact of the matter is that the mainstream has been completely incapable of correctly estimating the amount of ordinary mass of distant galaxies based on luminosity, and the null hypothesis has a 100 percent accurate track record of correctly predicting the outcome of every dark matter laboratory experiment over the past 30 years.

That's all any good skeptic requires to throw out the idea entirely.

Keep in mind that EU/PC theory is 100 percent consistent and compatible with the standard model of particle physics, the single most tested and successful model in the history of particle physics. EU/PC theory can also accommodate a static universe, an expanding universe or a contracting universe with ease. Even in the remote chance that new forms of matter and energy are eventually discovered, they can be accommodated in a modified model of EU/PC theory.

LCDM theory however is utterly and completely incompatible with the standard particle physics model, and it can *only* support an expansion interpretation of photon redshift. It can only support an expansion interpretation of photon redshift by relying upon 95 percent metaphysics and 5 percent "pseudoscience' according to the Nobel Prize winning author of MHD theory.

In terms of actual science, in comparison to EU/PC theory, there's nothing even remotely "better" about the LCDM model. The LCDM model is a metaphysical dinosaur that is doomed to fail and sure to end up on the trash heap of cosmology models. It has no ability to be modified even a tiny bit with respect to the percentages of exotic matter or exotic energy without completely falling apart. The LCDM model is a metaphysical house of cards that is destined to fall and nobody can stop that from happening. No amount of pure denial can change it's destiny.

It's time for mainstream astronomers to wake up and smell the coffee already. The LCDM model is the laughing stock of physics in 2019. It's scientifically untenable and complete incapable of holding up to serious scientific scrutiny as this thread so clearly demonstrates. It's completely unreliable in terms of predicting anything useful in laboratory experiments, and it's devoid of any real "knowledge" to start with. The vast majority of the LCDM model is nothing more than placeholder terms for human ignorance in the first place, so there's nothing to lose by throwing it away sooner rather than later, other than perhaps protecting a wee bit of pride and ego, but only temporarily at best.

Enough is enough already. It's time to pull off the metaphysical band-aids and embrace empirical physical explanations for astronomical observations. Nothing can save the LCDM model from going down in empirical flames and everyone will get burned by that inevitable process. It's better to cut one's losses sooner rather than later.
Michael Mozina
 
Posts: 1692
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA

Re: Lambda-CDM - EU/PC Theory - Confirmation Bias

Unread postby The Great Dog » Thu Jan 24, 2019 1:09 pm

There are no other dogs but The Great Dog
User avatar
The Great Dog
 
Posts: 246
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:58 pm

Re: Lambda-CDM - EU/PC Theory - Confirmation Bias

Unread postby Michael Mozina » Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:35 pm

Michael Mozina
 
Posts: 1692
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA

Re: Lambda-CDM - EU/PC Theory - Confirmation Bias

Unread postby Cargo » Fri Jan 25, 2019 8:17 pm

There was a publication today, about an enhancement of the Hubble Deep Field survey. And taking one tiny, tiny slice of the sky, they have already found that the mass estimates were too low by a factor of 3. 3 Times too low. At least. And this during the assumed first few hundred million years after the big bang. Because Red Shift tells us the distance/age of course. lol.
Cargo
 
Posts: 286
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:02 pm

Re: Lambda-CDM - EU/PC Theory - Confirmation Bias

Unread postby Zyxzevn » Fri Jan 25, 2019 8:19 pm

I can explain everything:

Image
More ** from zyxzevn at: and
User avatar
Zyxzevn
 
Posts: 991
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:48 pm

Down the dark matter rabbit hole they go....

Unread postby Michael Mozina » Mon Jan 28, 2019 4:58 pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... vQRTuW52GM

If you ever want to waste an hour just to see how far down the dark matter rabbit hole the mainstream has gone as of 2019, this video is very illuminating. A few things that you'll notice about the video is the absolute *certainty* they seem to have in the existence of exotic forms of matter, how tightly bound their model is to the cosmic microwave background, their certainty that the microwave background is due to a bang rather than Eddington's estimation of the average temperature of space based on the scattering of starlight, and how their model is absolutely dependent upon baryonic oscillation assumptions related to the LCDM model.

Around the three minute mark she puts up a background slide of the bullet cluster and starts talking about what they claim to "know" about dark matter. Not once does she mention the numerous number of lab failures of the DM models, the fact that mainstream luminosity estimates of baryonic matter have been repeatedly shown to be wrong, or anything even remotely suggesting any sort of healthy skepticism about anything related to the LCDM model. It's as though nothing but the CMB data is relevant to this issue, and her core assumption that the CMB can somehow be used to 'constrain' various properties of the DM models. It's absolutely amazing how certain they seem to be and how oblivious they are to anything *besides* their assumption of the cause of the CMB.

Keep in mind that dark matter is but *one* of the four metaphysical components of the LCMD model, so her assumptions amount to expecting to be able to put very tight constraints on invisible unicorns based on the other "known" effects of invisible faeries, gnomes and elves on the output of a flat screen television. :) This is all based on their certainty that the flat screen TV doesn't run on electricity too. :) Holy cow. They're simply oblivious to the various problems in their models and claims, and they really don't even care. It's so bizarre.

Suffice to say it's all speculative nonsense that is so far detached from reality and from empirical lab tested physics that it's not even funny.
Michael Mozina
 
Posts: 1692
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA

Re: Lambda-CDM - EU/PC Theory - Confirmation Bias

Unread postby Michael Mozina » Sun Feb 03, 2019 4:29 pm

https://www.space.com/43166-dark-energy ... asars.html
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=17249

Even though we have another thread going on this topic, I'd though I'd add this refutation of the LCDM dark energy model in this thread too since it directly refutes and undermines the scientific validity of the LCDM model.

Suffice to say that this new failed prediction of the LCDM model *should* cause the mainstream to reevaluate their entire assumption about the real cause of photon redshfit and to take a closer look at Hubble's *preferred* explanation of Hubble's Law (tired light/static universe).

Considering the serious confirmation bias problem in astronomy today however, In all likelihood this new informatoin will simply result in another metaphysical kludge to an already absurd set of assumptions about the actual cause of redshift in a plasma universe. Even though an entirely empirical solution to this problem exists, the mainstream will not and could not embrace empirical physics lest their prestige and funding go flying out the window.

Stay tuned for the next installment of "Moving the LCMD metaphysical goalposts" by the mainstream. :)
Michael Mozina
 
Posts: 1692
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA

Re: Lambda-CDM - EU/PC Theory - Confirmation Bias

Unread postby neilwilkes » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:54 am

You will never get a man to understand something his salary depends on him not understanding.
User avatar
neilwilkes
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:30 am
Location: London, England

Dark matter theory steps in deap-3600 Canadian do-do

Unread postby Michael Mozina » Tue Feb 12, 2019 3:34 am

Michael Mozina
 
Posts: 1692
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA

Strike three for dark matter this week.

Unread postby Michael Mozina » Tue Feb 12, 2019 3:56 am

Michael Mozina
 
Posts: 1692
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA

This has become a classic example of confirmation bias

Unread postby Michael Mozina » Tue Feb 12, 2019 10:43 am

After skimming through those last three papers on dark matter and reading through the quasar paper on dark energy, it's become very clear that this whole process has become a classic example of confirmation bias run amok. It's like the whole Ptolemaic scenario all over again. The excuses are getting ever more desperate with respect to DM, and the expansion interpretation of redshift has failed major test after major test for the last 20 years. Galaxies are more "mature" than they're supposed to be, they're larger than they're supposed to be. H-alpha lines are visible at distances never considered possible in the LCDM model. The addition of dark energy to a big bang model was a *gross* violation of known conservation of energy laws, and apparently even *that goofy change* won't work right at higher redshifts.

Evidently it doesn't matter one iota to the 'true believers" of the LCMD model how many so called "tests" the LCDM model fails, both in the lab and in space. It doesn't matter to them that their belief system is in direct conflict with known laws of physics. It doesn't matter to them that their model has zero useful predictive value. It doesn't matter to them that there are empirical alternatives to their belief system which do *not* violate those same laws of physics and which actually work in the lab. It does not matter to them that magnetism in plasma cannot exist in the absence of electrical current and electric fields. It doesn't matter to them that they've spent *tens of billions* of dollars and haven't produced a single piece of evidence to support their model. Scientific validity doesn't matter to them in the least.

Evidently the only things that matter to them is protecting their prestige and protecting their sources of income.

I can't even imagine how it's possible to fail more so called "tests" than the LCDM model has already failed. It's been a disaster and a half in terms of the number of tests it's failed, going all the way back to the introduction of "dark energy" to salvage the BB model and try to shield it from falsification. It's just failing one test after another after another with no end in sight.

There's no valid empirical evidence that the CMB has anything to do with a "bang" and plenty of empirical evidence to demonstrate that it's directly related to stellar output like every other "background" wavelength, and it's related to ordinary scattering processes in space. There's no valid empirical cause/effect evidence that a bang took place, that space expansion has some tangible effect on photons, that inflation ever existed, or that "dark energy" was anything other than a desperate metaphysical "hail Mary" play to try to save the big bang model from ordinary scientific falsification.

How many tests does a physics model have to fail before it's finally given it's last rights, put in a coffin and buried once and for all? I think only Ptolemy theory is a bigger embarrassment to astronomy than the LCDM model and I'm not even sure about that. Even Ptolemy theory didn't require *four* invisible metaphysical claims to prop it up, and it never failed so many observational and experimental "tests" before it was finally discarded.

This is like watching a physics train wreck in slow motion.
Michael Mozina
 
Posts: 1692
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA

ABRACADABRA - Another bust for dark matter detection

Unread postby Michael Mozina » Fri Mar 29, 2019 10:56 am

Michael Mozina
 
Posts: 1692
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA

PreviousNext

Return to Electric Universe

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest