Latest ThunderboltsProject video is about comets:
Dirty Snowballs Falsified – NASA Fails to Notice | Space News
There is so much difference between the unproven official theory:
From an unproven Ortcould
appears a unproven snowball
that unproven ejects water
forming an unproven water tail.
Not only are these parts unproven, in observations we can see that ALL
these assumptions are completely wrong.
The comets are rock
There is no real ejection of material, there is only erosion, mostly electrical erosion.
The tail is more an electrical charged particles instead of gas/ice particles.
The comet does not evaporate near the sun, and it must contain solid materials.
The ice-ball theory is more than falsified. It is wasted.
This is all more in line with an electrical comet theory.
The tail/tails are a product of electrical erosion and electrochemical processes.
Why this is exactly is not clear yet, but it may indeed be possible that
the electrical properties are depend on the path through the solar wind.
Yet I do not expect any change in the sciences.
An uncle of mine writes scientific articles for newspapers and journals about space.
As I spoke with him. he has no idea of any of this. While he is interested in alternative
ideas, he only repeats what he has learned from others.
He does not doubt much the theories, because no-one publishes papers
on the falsifications of these theories. He thinks that the "sceptics"
who defend the old theories, have actually looked into the facts.
And no-one writes about falsifications, because you have to go against
so many other "scientists". Facts don't matter.
It is clear that the corrective process in science is broken.