Brightest Supernova Exploded 6 Times?
- MGmirkin
- Moderator
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Beaverton, Oregon, USA
- Contact:
Brightest Supernova Exploded 6 Times?
(Brightest supernova died six times)
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stor ... .htm?space
Seems to be stretching it a bit. How does a star explode 6 times? I mean, in a non-electric universe. Stars puffing off layers as part of a repeating discharge is not so unbelievable in an electric universe... Seems a bit weird otherwise.
Cheers,
~Michael Gmirkin
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stor ... .htm?space
Seems to be stretching it a bit. How does a star explode 6 times? I mean, in a non-electric universe. Stars puffing off layers as part of a repeating discharge is not so unbelievable in an electric universe... Seems a bit weird otherwise.
Cheers,
~Michael Gmirkin
"The purpose of science is to investigate the unexplained, not to explain the uninvestigated." ~Dr. Stephen Rorke
"For every PhD there is an equal and opposite PhD." ~Gibson's law
"For every PhD there is an equal and opposite PhD." ~Gibson's law
-
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 6:48 am
Re: Brightest Supernova Exploded 6 Times?
lol"The temperature in the stellar core gets so hot that some of the star's gamma radiation converts into electrons and their anti-matter counterparts, positrons."
-
- Guest
Re: Brightest Supernova Exploded 6 Times?
The variously reported positions of that "brightest" supernova ever (SN 2006gy) should make somebody in mainstream astronomy very nervous, so nervous that they don't even talk about them.
I claim that the three different reported postions (for an object that supposedly is located so far away that no proper motion whatsoever should be seen) may be taken as evidence for a very nearby binary star (100 light years or less) that is doing what would be expected if you subscribed to a distance limited form of Galilean relativity. The "limited form" (which amounts to Walter Ritz's 1908 ballistic electrodynamics as modified by John Fox's 1965 extinction theorem) is explained in the following article.
SN2006gy as a Ritzian System
http://www.datasync.com/~rsf1/sn2006gy.htm
A translation of Ritz's 1908 (Galilean) electrodynamics paper can be found at:
Critical Researches on General Electrodynamics
http://www.datasync.com/~rsf1/crit/1908a.htm
Bob Fritzius
I claim that the three different reported postions (for an object that supposedly is located so far away that no proper motion whatsoever should be seen) may be taken as evidence for a very nearby binary star (100 light years or less) that is doing what would be expected if you subscribed to a distance limited form of Galilean relativity. The "limited form" (which amounts to Walter Ritz's 1908 ballistic electrodynamics as modified by John Fox's 1965 extinction theorem) is explained in the following article.
SN2006gy as a Ritzian System
http://www.datasync.com/~rsf1/sn2006gy.htm
A translation of Ritz's 1908 (Galilean) electrodynamics paper can be found at:
Critical Researches on General Electrodynamics
http://www.datasync.com/~rsf1/crit/1908a.htm
Bob Fritzius
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 5:32 pm
Re: Brightest Supernova Exploded 6 Times?
The URLs for this post have been changed to
http://www.shadetreephysics.com/sn2006gy.htm
and
http://www.shadetreephysics.com/crit/108a.htm
Thanks!
http://www.shadetreephysics.com/sn2006gy.htm
and
http://www.shadetreephysics.com/crit/108a.htm
Thanks!
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 5:32 pm
Re: Brightest Supernova Exploded 6 Times?
Oops! Second URL is actuallyRobertFritzius wrote:The URLs for this post have been changed to
http://www.shadetreephysics.com/sn2006gy.htm
and
http://www.shadetreephysics.com/crit/108a.htm
Thanks!
http://www.shadetreephysics.com/crit/1908a.htm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests