[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 488: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 1056: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3897)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4762: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3897)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4764: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3897)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4765: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3897)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4766: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3897)
Thunderbolts Forum • View topic - Magnetic Reconnection

Magnetic Reconnection

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Re: Magnetic Reconnection

Unread postby Zyxzevn » Tue Feb 27, 2018 5:56 pm

"My" model is based on the basic principle that
positive charged material (protons+ ions) goes to a negative region
and
negative charged material (electrons+ ions) goes to a positive region.


Image

Lets look at the flare in the image and the involved regions.
There are 2 currents at A and B.
The current at A shortcuts and causes a rising flare
that produces a cloud of material to rise from the surface.

Image
This material goes from A to C.

So assuming that the cloud is mostly positive charged,
C is probably a negative charged region.
At A there is already a current going on.

Image
The could goes further towards B.
So at B there is a strong negatively charged region.

But also a bit goes back to C.
And I suspect that the flare/cloud had some
negative charged material too.
This should go back to A.

If we look further, we can also see a current flowing between A and B.
This current is strengthened by the addition of the material from the flare.

Image

But those are not the only things that we can see.

-Flickering-
We can see a repeating flickering of the currents at A and at B.
This is caused by the inductance and capacitance of the electrical circuits.
And as we know, this creates a resonator.
The mass of the plasma-current adds to the inductance of the circuit.
So it is not only magnetic inductance.

-Circular path-
At A we can see a circular current. This is caused by the magnetic field.
Magnetism is also causing the twisting of the flare/cloud.

-Split lines-
Many current-lines are split at the origin and destinations.
This is because similar charges repel each other.
You can see the same phenomenon in a plasma-ball.


Here is a better example of line-splitting.

It is similar to this:
Image


This all needs more research.
But I think I do already a much better job than the mainstream holy astrologers.

How can they believe in magnetic field lines bumping against each other?
It just blows my mind!
Image
More ** from zyxzevn at: and
User avatar
Zyxzevn
 
Posts: 991
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:48 pm

Re: Magnetic Reconnection

Unread postby Zyxzevn » Wed Feb 28, 2018 7:38 am

I have to correct
The "hairs" in the last 2 images are produced by different sparks through the air.
On the sun there is no alternating current, so this does not work.

The flares are still separate in a common plasmaball, so it is clear that this is
a very common feature for discharges in an electric field.

One explanation could be saturation: the plasma can run out of free ions and
free electrons at one place. So the current needs to find new paths to go to
the destination.
The physics seems very similar to that of
that we used may years ago.
More ** from zyxzevn at: and
User avatar
Zyxzevn
 
Posts: 991
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:48 pm

Re: Magnetic Reconnection

Unread postby seasmith » Wed Feb 28, 2018 7:44 pm

seasmith
 
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: Magnetic Reconnection

Unread postby Zyxzevn » Thu Mar 01, 2018 7:35 am

I agree with the north and south pole in the picture of the sun.
Could it be the product of rotating charges around the sun?

The smaller magnetic fields, which we detect with the zeeman effect
in sunspots seem to me electrical fields causing a Stark effect.
This means that we see many small pockets of charged areas.

This explains how the currents flow above the sun, which we can all see.

With magnetic fields we get a problem.
We need very very strong circular currents to generate such fields.
Remember: we have no coil with superconducting material,
and in conducting plasma there are a lot eddy-currents causing resistance.

And if we follow the mainstream logic, these currents can only come from a changing
magnetic field. This changing magnetic field must surround the current and
change to the opposite direction.
So with normal physics, we start with a big magnetic field that causes smaller magnetic fields to exist.
This is also how electromagnetic waves are working.
But I see no strong circular currents around the spots.
I see no very strong declining magnetic fields around the spots.
So there is no valid physical reason for very strong magnetic fields to exist.
This is a real problem.

Yet, these spots have all the markings of electric fields.

That is why I do not believe that we see the Zeeman effect at dark spots (and such),
but mostly the Stark effect.

The sun just became a lot simpler and more electric.
More ** from zyxzevn at: and
User avatar
Zyxzevn
 
Posts: 991
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:48 pm

Re: Magnetic Reconnection

Unread postby Zyxzevn » Sat Mar 03, 2018 7:50 am

More Magnetic Reconnection Nonsense.
For someone with EM education, people talking about magnetic reconnection
is similar to people talking about flat earth.


What exactly causes the magnetic fields to separate and reconnect, and why does the reconnection take place more quickly than theory says it should?
..
“Our study suggests that disruption of the current sheet caused by the plasmoid instability may provide a trigger,” Huang said.


Image
(suitable picture for the fictional astronomy)

This all clearly demonstrates the lack of basic EM knowledge and confirmation bias of these astronomers.
All seem to think that connecting fields lines do anything.
According to well known and tested physics, field lines do not matter at all.
So all this "science" is just a load of bullshit.

Anyway. Now the good news.

How to summon a solar flare

Want to know how a strong current expels a solar flare?

I have 4 models now:

Gas expansion model.
Due to a shortcut we get an explosive gas-expansion.
This explosion sends plasma above it into space.
Characteristics: Shortcut between two charged regions on the sun.

Nuclear model.
Due to a very strong shortcut we do not only get an explosive
gas-expansion, but also nuclear reactions.
This explosion might be responsible for the x-class flares.
Characteristics: Very strong shortcut between two charged regions on the sun.

Split current model. (theoretical)
Due to a shortcut, a flare forms 2 currents.
The original current is still full with charged material, but
due to the short-cut the charge configuration of the environment has
changed.
This may cause the charges in the original current to be
repelled by the charges in the short-cut current.
Characteristics: Shortcut expels older current.

Rail-gun model.
After seeing some videos on rail-guns, I realized i was seeing
the same thing as a flare.
With a strong current, the exact replica of a rail-gun mechanism is created.

Image

The current creates both the magnetic field and the Lorenz-force.
This means that any flare on the sun can behave like a rail-gun.
Characteristics: Strong current causing a strong magnetic field.
More ** from zyxzevn at: and
User avatar
Zyxzevn
 
Posts: 991
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:48 pm

Re: Magnetic Reconnection

Unread postby seasmith » Sat Mar 03, 2018 11:52 am

seasmith
 
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: Magnetic Reconnection

Unread postby Zyxzevn » Sat Mar 03, 2018 1:49 pm

More ** from zyxzevn at: and
User avatar
Zyxzevn
 
Posts: 991
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:48 pm

Re: Magnetic Reconnection

Unread postby seasmith » Sat Mar 03, 2018 8:40 pm

Yes, astro-spectroscopy has been a mess for 20 years easy.
seasmith
 
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: Magnetic Reconnection

Unread postby seasmith » Sun Mar 04, 2018 6:06 pm

seasmith
 
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: Magnetic Reconnection

Unread postby Zyxzevn » Tue Mar 06, 2018 8:35 pm

Some PhDs publish new bullshit article



In short: They found/calculated Alfven waves and now they think they solved everything.

It was only time until the PhDs would make a mistake in their formulas that might actually produce
something that seems right.

Safire shows very strong electric fields
They find them in double-layers, near the surface.


This already breaks with everything of mainstream plasma physics.
Great work.

A strong electric field also means that there is a strong Stark effect on the sun,
exactly in the area where the Sun's light is produced.

This is what I actually predicted: There is a strong Stark effect present on the sun.

Proof of absence of magnetism on the sun

Let's assume the sunspots have strong magnetic fields.
We see strong currents going away from these spots.
You can actually see the plasma move around.
These currents are pretty stable.

Now look at what happens if we create such a circuit.

Image
This is a replica of the first electro motor ever made by Faraday.

We see the current circle around the magnetic field.

Image
We also have this setup.
In a conducting environment we should see the magnetic
fields and the currents circle around.

Now let's look at a solar-rope and flare. (from above)


While you can see some twisting, the bases of the current-lines are very stable.

This means: there is almost no magnetic field at the basis, or there is no current.
Because we can see currents, and magnetic fields can not even exist without currents,
this means there is almost no magnetic field at the basis.

And because the magnetic field is weak, this means the Zeeman effect is not
very strong, but it is a Stark effect instead. And this means that we have
strong electric fields.

It seems that I have now proofed many times of why the sun is electric,
based on observations and the maxwell equations.
More ** from zyxzevn at: and
User avatar
Zyxzevn
 
Posts: 991
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:48 pm

Re: Magnetic Reconnection

Unread postby Michael Mozina » Tue Mar 06, 2018 9:09 pm

Michael Mozina
 
Posts: 1692
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA

Re: Magnetic Reconnection

Unread postby Zyxzevn » Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:17 am

More ** from zyxzevn at: and
User avatar
Zyxzevn
 
Posts: 991
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:48 pm

Re: Magnetic Reconnection

Unread postby Zyxzevn » Sat Mar 31, 2018 9:54 am

Some more papers on magnetism in space.

Rethinking the solar flare paradigm
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.10389.pdf
It still tries to follow the reconnection unicorn, but actually does some calculations.

The paper shows that there is a mismatch of order 10^6
Which is an error similar to flat earth.
It also notes that some very huge currents and fields are hidden from
observation, while they should be visible.
Its conclusion is that the model needs a dramatic overhaul.

My advice: forget about the unicorns.
The matter is of course simply explained by replacing some of the impossible large Zeeman effect
with the moderate Stark effect. Because it is now proven that the the electrical field can
be strong due to double layers.

A holistic perspective on the dynamics of G035.39-00.33:
The interplay between gas and magnetic fields

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.09457.pdf
It uses the polarisation of light to produce nice pictures.
determine the electromagnetic field.
It shows how they are somehow in line with the filaments in space,
which proves the existence of Birkeland currents.
(Unless you believe in unicorns).

The paper assumes that the field is always magnetic.
I would argue that an electric field might also cause polarisation of dust/gas.
But they selected certain light frequencies that match with certain
chemical structures. It would be nice to have a laboratory report that shows
how these chemicals react both to magnetic and electric fields. And maybe
have other light frequencies that are more specialized to ions that are related
to the electric field.
Gasses can indeed react to magnetic fields.


A new trend of the mainstream seems now to overemphasize the importance of
magnetism to ignore again the electric currents and electrical fields that
are present in space. And to forget that you need electrical currents to
create a magnetic field in the first place.

Magnetic field at a jet base: extreme Faraday rotation in 3C 273
revealed by ALMA

What could create large magnetic fields? Currents maybe?
And what are these currents?
Wait, we have jets don't we?
Sometimes it is hard to see the obvious.
More ** from zyxzevn at: and
User avatar
Zyxzevn
 
Posts: 991
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:48 pm

Re: Magnetic Reconnection

Unread postby Zyxzevn » Sat Jun 16, 2018 7:37 pm

More ** from zyxzevn at: and
User avatar
Zyxzevn
 
Posts: 991
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:48 pm

Re: Magnetic Reconnection

Unread postby Zyxzevn » Sun Jun 17, 2018 5:36 am

A problem similar to "magnetic reconnection".



Step1: REALISATION - Hey, normal magnetism does not fit.
Step2: REMODEL - Let's invent magnetic field lines magic
Step3: BEND PHYSICS - Let's bend physics to fit our idea.

Note: IGNORE the simplest working solution (Electric Fields).
More ** from zyxzevn at: and
User avatar
Zyxzevn
 
Posts: 991
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:48 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Electric Universe

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest