Yep Jean, just as I figured. You're completely incapable of finding any mathematical errors or physics errors in his new paper, so the first thing you do is engage in personal attacks and character assassination while hiding like a coward behind an anonymous handle. You "debate" the topic by attacking the *person* rather than the idea and by calling him a 'crackpot". EU/PC haters have no scientific ethics whatsoever as you so clearly demonstrated.JeanTate:
How does this make Scott any different from the thousands of other fringe/crackpot authors,
And what is your next "ploy"?
Since you can't find any math errors, you attack the *publication* too! Wheeeeee! In short, you're incapable of finding any mathematical errors, or physics errors, so all you can do is attack the person and/or the publication.who publish in obscure or totally dodgy journals (e.g. PIP),
How sad that you simply ignore all the failed "tests" of your own models, and deny the fact that other models do exist which eliminate the need for your exotic, invisible, dark matter snipes. What's the point of throwing mathematical pearls before EU/PC hater swine anyway?
CQ? WTF? Really? That's the single most draconian board and ridiculous rule system I've ever seen in cyberspace. Most religious based websites are more open and honest, and allow for more debate than CQ. ChristianForums is more open and fair than that lame Cosmosquelch website. You folks ban everyone that posts there, and you close every thread within 30 days. CQ burns all it's heretics at the stake! Why the hell would anyone care about CQ? Physicsforums isnt' much better. They not only instantly ban everyone who posts anything related to EU/PC theory, they also ban everyone who even dares to question their dark matter dogma as I quickly discovered. Your mainstream websites aren't "special" in any way Jean.There are, historically, many a thread on ideas by such authors, here, in CQ, even in PF; for example, there’s a long-running thread here in ISF on Mills and his “hydrino”. And we even had Lerner start a thread here, on his own BB never happened ideas.
Yawn. More personal attacks, and no substance whatsoever, just as I predicted.Addressing all this fringe/crackpot stuff....
Right. You have plenty of time to whine in your endless EU/PC threads at ISF about how the EU/PC community isn't "working" on anything (which is a lie to start with), but when appropriate material, including the math that you asked for is handed to you on a silver platter, you 'don't have time for it". What a frigging hypocrite.would take far more time than one person has, so prioritization is essential.
You don't give a damn about your own failed tests, so that BS is nothing but a convenient lie that you tell yourself and others. Your DM claims failed every conceivable test it was put to over the past decade, both in the lab, and in space, so you definitely don't give a damn about your own "tests" unless they happen to agree with your preconceived beliefs. You spent *billions* supposedly testing your DM claims, and it was an *epic* fail.That’s one reason why I like to focus on tests ...
Did you? What kind of 'tests' would suffice? FYI, the fact that we observe all those galaxies aligned with the threads they're embedded inside of over hundreds of millions of light years is in fact a great "test" of this concept. That's exactly what we'd expect to see!so in this case, did Scott propose some concrete, feasible tests of his musings?
Translation: You only have time to endlessly bitch and moan and lie about EU/PC theory on irrelevant websites. You don't have time to actually respond to any of the materials presented, so your make up any lame excuse to not deal with the material and you going to to right back to bitching about EU/PC theory anyway. Got it. You're a liar. You weren't even interested in the materials that you asked for in the first place.Has he posted to a relevant, moderated forum?
Right, because you only have time to take away from your own "research" (all of which failed every test you came up with) to complain about EU/PC theory on ISF and other lame websites. You don't have the time to be bothered to read or respond to any actual published and peer reviewed material that conflicts with your blind hatred of empirical alternatives to your supernatural creation mythology.If not, why does he deserve any of us taking time away from our own research?
EU/PC hater are 100 percent predictable. You all lie like a rug, you cheat at debate, you attack *people* not ideas, and you run like hell from the materials that you claim to want to see, all while hiding like cowards behind anonymous handles. EU/PC haters are nothing but two bit cowards and liars.