
so. After watching hours upon hours of space news videos/watching EU conferences. I'm convinced the electric universe is on the right track. (to say the least. I've only been aware of the EU theroy for about a week. so i'm new)
and it raises a lot of Really interesting questions.
These questions need to be thrown at the public. It's time.
so I took it upon myself to start talking to people about this. This is profound stuff. space isn't a perfect vacuum?! the sun isn't dying!

"wow. this is neat" I'd say. "this theory says that the universe is a giant vat of positive and negatively charged matter, spinning around. conducting electricity in space!. oh and it explains mythology!"
and of course that was met with the only thing a "sensible" person would say. "ummmm. what? whatever nonsense you are talking about is a pseudo-science, it's like flat earth, Reality is sad. get used to it"
(except my friends who smoke weed, no problem convincing them)
There was instant resistance to the mere consideration that "gravity might not be the force that is dictating activity in space"
and wow. people get visibly angry and start frothing at the mouth when you say "blackholes don't exist, they are a mathematical construct"
I realized I will never be able to TELL anyone anything.
you can't shout truth from the rooftops and expect people to care.
I had one particular friend who I shared video after video. providing timestamps so they could skip the "boring" stuff.
it was met with "im only 5 minutes in, and I have 14 tabs open explaining why this is wrong"

here is an excerpt from the conversation (in regards to electrical scarring on mars, being repeated with an arc welder/making electrical blisters to explain Olympus Mons)
Him:
i just think they are making conclusions based on the result desired versus evidence presented
steve smith even says it at one point
Me:
so lab experiments don't reflect things on a different scale?
Him:
absolutely not
this is one of the core confusions of macro evolution versus micro
if you are performing an experiment, you have to have conditions that are similar to the outcome, and you are NOT supposed to create conditions to arrive an an outcome
Everything I threw at him. was met with "not possible" or "wrong way of doing science" "doesn't count" "other factors they haven't considered" (I should mention he assumes he's an expert on all things. even things he's never heard of)
So I realized that to change people's minds. I must rethink my strategy.
I asked myself
How can I persuade my close minded friend, and by extension close minded people the world over?
well. how did I convince myself?
I have watched probably 20+ hours of videos on this. so i'm convinced.
(plus seeing lichtenberg fractals/lightning patters all over the place in nature: in human veins, nerves, the basic shape of plants/trees, roots, heck. even some woodgrain looks like an electromagnetic field, and when you apply force to most anything, the cracks that form resemble lightning, like in cracked concrete, which makes me ask basic questions, why do cracks form that way? why do trees/roots grow that way? wtf is energy anyway? why do seeds grow in the first place?)
But asking people to watch 20 hours of really dry scientific videos is a tall order considering most people don't really give a crap about space to begin with. (unless it's star wars)
Side note: star wars could totally work in the EU, "the force" is electromagnetism, lightsabers/blasters are charged plasma, light speed is a ship in a scaled up natural particle accelerator. It happened a long time ago, in a glaxy far far away. etc. whatever, it's fun to think about.
and they have to watch 20 hours of video with an open mind.
so that's out.
it also turns out that when discussing "science" you can't bring up anything that our ancestors said. because "we are so advanced" and they were so primitive

so when trying to convince people. we CAN'T bring up mythology. (at first)

so. what are the fastest ways to convey this information without sounding batshit crazy to the average person. how do we make it not boring?
What can we bring up? and how long are peoples attention spans? and how do we not make people feel "wrong" or bad.
because no one likes to admit they are wrong. I mean, people have fought to death to defend things they believe to be true.
how can we say "the math is correct, but it's totally inaccurate, it's like the superposition of the scientific field, you wouldn't understand"
How do we make them feel "ok" about having a Paradigm shift? How do we make it "not anybody's fault"
which I think comes from explaining how math got started in the first place, and how it got to where it is today.
a fun, simple, logical history of the origin of math and where it went wrong.
So what do we do?
My thoughts:
so how about a 10 minute video?
a highlight reel if you will. filled with links to the full length "boring" video explaining it.
what would be in said video?
no mythology.
focus on the admitted problems, by the accredited scientific institutions. (e.g. Neil degrass tyson saying we don't know what gravity is, "whatever hit the moon of tethys should have destroyed it, - pop science (or whoever) just show the overwhelming. articles, interviews...."impossible thing discovered" "scientists baffled" "this doesn't match our models" etc.
because if they knew what they doing, they could explain it perfectly.
like how they can with classical physics.
we need to show that science is flawed. and that all this stuff was from the turn of the century or before.
written before electricity was really around. look at how medicine has evolved, technology. our understanding of electricity. but cosmology hasn't evolved at all. the theories haven't changed in 100 years.
new evidence is ignored/misinterpreted
how the fields are scattered. and how no one is an "expert" in usually more than one field.
Gravity doesn't scale down, which is proven.
why do we assume it scales up?
there is the famous .gif showing how small we are compared to the sun.
assumptions are how we got here.
and The things you guys are doing are amazing! seriously.
and you are getting ground cover.
but people like fast paced videos they can share on facebook.
Idk just wanted to get the ball rolling on how we can get this info out there.
well. you guys got the ball rolling. I want to increase the (relative) mass of it by making it go faster.

So does anyone have any suggestions/opinions on this?
I'd like to have neil degrass tyson/bill nye acknowledge the electric universe and not be able to dismiss it.
WE NEED TO BUILD A WALL... of evidence, like lawyers going to court.
except we don't have the budget, or the name. or the reach.
So how will we fight? When all we have is logic and love on our side
