by LongtimeAirman » Sat Jul 19, 2014 2:35 pm
D - Drakekay questions, _A - Airman answers
D1. Does the sun merely receive energy along its poles then emit that energy through its equator?
D1_A. First off, by your question, you realize that I am a notorious Miles minion. Miles’ theories are currently being “debated”, and are not yet deemed ready for the more serious Electric mainstream. That said, the sun recycles photons as does all matter in the universe. It receives and emits energy at all times. Photons from the local galaxy and beyond are impacting the sun, inside and out, while all the sun's matter constantly emit photons. The sun’s emission field drives ions and electrons of enormous energies, but it is receiving a roughly equal amount of energy strictly in the form of photons. Statistically speaking, most photons enter the sun at the poles, and most photons are emitted not from the equator exactly, but from latitudes +/- 30 degrees. Instead of cathode or anode, by Miles’ theory I would call the sun a lamp, mostly just a resistor heated to incandescence.
D2. Is the glow of light surrounding us actually glow that reached us from the sun, or is it the result of a charge hitting one side of the planet and exiting the other or both?
D2_A. The glow is due to illumination and emission, photons from above and below. The albedo or solar reflected light of many of the planets is too high. The planets are generating their own light, primarily in the infrared, but also enough visible light to make their albedo’s unexplained by standard theory.
D3. Does this indicate that spherical bodies in space can act as both anode and cathode?
D3_A. Actually yes. All incoming energy is strictly photons, (aside from the occasional asteroid or comet), and the emission energy is photonic as well as electrical. Photons cause electrical and magnetic fields, but one cannot detect the presence of those fields unless electrons and ions are present, as is the case with the sun’s emission field.
D4. Is this what we see in the relationships in a Rodin Coil, or the Z pinches?
D4_A. I don’t know what a Rodin Coil is. I believe Z pinches are high current flows, related to filaments, where neutral matter can be created.
D5. I even wonder if the frequency each planet vibrates at has anything to do with its orbit.
D5_A. In MM theory, the planets reach stable orbits between the “pull” of gravity and the “push” of the emission field. This equilibrium is a function of the planet’s size. Smaller planets would naturally orbit closer to the sun.
D6. All of these can be tested at much smaller scales. I was thinking a softball sized sphere. The scaled electrical charges on that could be much easier to manage.
D6_A. I don’t see how we can test MM’s ideas, because while the softball sized spheres are constantly receiving photons from the ambient charge field, we are artificially increasing/injecting energy via an electrical source. Given that understanding, maybe it makes sense.
I don’t see how my reply pertains to The Primer Fields, or LaPoint’s magnets, but if we are modeling, I believe that the magnetic fields provided by those magnets are superior to a mere anode or cathode effect.
REMCB