beautifulDotini wrote:Some really nice shots of cometary jets, streaks, glows and blobs to be seen here:
http://www.universetoday.com/119296/dus ... tas-comet/
'Welease Wosetta!'
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
- FS3
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:44 pm
- Location: Europe
- Contact:
Where are my socks?
After your announcement I'm still wondering where my socks are:
...Honestly saying, the sock-effect (not "rolling" but BLOWING OFF) came after I was reading the following lines:
Not even speaking of that "fluffy" feeling. Do those people have to sign up to some kind of special courses where they are indoctrinated with that kind of bs?
My socks blew off further than those "jets" at 67P.
And that is at least something.
My feet feel like an icy nucleus now. No wonder, without socks.
Kudos!
FS3
I was expecting pictures, my dear - for experiencing your promised effect (with my socks). So, may I help you out? Here...Dotini wrote:Some really nice shots of cometary jets, streaks, glows and blobs to be seen here:
http://www.universetoday.com/119296/dus ... tas-comet/
...Honestly saying, the sock-effect (not "rolling" but BLOWING OFF) came after I was reading the following lines:
Got it? - Those "tiny, invisible - pd. COMPLETELY INVISIBLE - "icy nucleus"......When you and I look at a comet in our telescopes or binoculars, we’re seeing mostly the coma, the bright, fluffy head of the comet composed of dust and gas ejected by the tiny, completely invisible, icy nucleus...
Not even speaking of that "fluffy" feeling. Do those people have to sign up to some kind of special courses where they are indoctrinated with that kind of bs?
My socks blew off further than those "jets" at 67P.
And that is at least something.
My feet feel like an icy nucleus now. No wonder, without socks.
Kudos!
FS3
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
Despite zero ice being detected at all they insist it is there in fact.
This is an example of not only conforming the data to fit the theory but inventing data to fit the theory.
This is an example of not only conforming the data to fit the theory but inventing data to fit the theory.
- GaryN
- Posts: 2668
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:18 pm
- Location: Sooke, BC, Canada
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
Rosetta: OSIRIS detects hints of ice in the comet's neck
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-03-rosetta-os ... t.html#jCpFalse color image showing the smooth Hapi region connecting the head and body of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Differences in reflectivity have been enhanced in this image to emphasise the blueish color of the Hapi region. The scientific data was acquired on 21 August 2014 by the scientific imaging system OSIRIS successively with the filters centered at 989, 700 and 480 nanometers and the images then superposed. During these observations Rosetta was 70 km far away from the comet. Credit: ESA/Rosetta/MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS/UPD/LAM/IAA/SSO/INTA/UPM/DASP/IDA
In order to change an existing paradigm you do not struggle to try and change the problematic model. You create a new model and make the old one obsolete. -Buckminster Fuller
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
Comets do not need perihelion solar heat to flare up. The scant trace of ice isn't sublimating to create the coma as they describe it. If anything, the ice is deposited onto the surface as some of the created water vapor falls back. This is the reverse of what ESA believes.GaryN wrote:Rosetta: OSIRIS detects hints of ice in the comet's neck
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-03-rosetta-os ... t.html#jCpFalse color image showing the smooth Hapi region connecting the head and body of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Differences in reflectivity have been enhanced in this image to emphasise the blueish color of the Hapi region. The scientific data was acquired on 21 August 2014 by the scientific imaging system OSIRIS successively with the filters centered at 989, 700 and 480 nanometers and the images then superposed. During these observations Rosetta was 70 km far away from the comet. Credit: ESA/Rosetta/MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS/UPD/LAM/IAA/SSO/INTA/UPM/DASP/IDA
- GaryN
- Posts: 2668
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:18 pm
- Location: Sooke, BC, Canada
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
"Comets do not need perihelion solar heat to flare up. The scant trace of ice isn't sublimating to create the coma as they describe it. If anything, the ice is deposited onto the surface as some of the created water vapor falls back. This is the reverse of what ESA believes."
And I believe you are more likely correct.
And I believe you are more likely correct.
In order to change an existing paradigm you do not struggle to try and change the problematic model. You create a new model and make the old one obsolete. -Buckminster Fuller
- Metryq
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:31 am
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
That sounds like some ultra-red hamburger I bought once. I doubt there was a gram of fat in it. I think the burger actually grew during cooking, rather than shrinking. It was probably drawing fat out of the air.viscount aero wrote:If anything, the ice is deposited onto the surface as some of the created water vapor falls back.
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
Thank youGaryN wrote:"Comets do not need perihelion solar heat to flare up. The scant trace of ice isn't sublimating to create the coma as they describe it. If anything, the ice is deposited onto the surface as some of the created water vapor falls back. This is the reverse of what ESA believes."
And I believe you are more likely correct.
You can see clearly, too, that sand, regolith (dunes), are created on the surface. In my opinion this is fallout from the coma in a process not yet examined. Dune formation or any other surface deposition phenomena cannot be considered because it isn't recognized by the establishment as existing. Even though it exists photographically speaking, ESA doesn't actually heed it very far. They can't. Their imagination seems to stop after they are confounded over how there "isn't enough air" for dunes to form. So the dunes are only "dune like" and not real. For them, dunes can only form ONE way in the entire universe. Ice must exist in only ONE form, in only ONE way, on any body. This demonstrates how a lack of an imagination hampers science. Einstein warned against this.
- FS3
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:44 pm
- Location: Europe
- Contact:
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
I couldn't help myself, I had to do it...
https://twitter.com/FarSight3/status/576717540082249728
https://twitter.com/FarSight3/status/576715898502787072
I wanted to EMBED the Tweets here first - but sorry to say it's not working properly...
FS3
- MattEU
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:00 am
- Contact:
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
Latest data from Rosetta project
* A full rotation of the body takes just over 12.4 hours
* The axis of rotation runs through the "neck" region
* Its larger lobe ("body") is about 4.1 × 3.3 × 1.8 km
* The smaller lobe ("head") is about 2.6 × 2.3 × 1.8 km
* Gravity measurements give a mass of 10 billion tonnes
* Mapping estimates the volume to be about 21.4 cubic km
* The density works out at about 470kg per cubic metre
* This would imply that Comet 67P is highly porous
* It is 70-80% empty space, but are there big voids inside?
* Daytime surface temperatures range from -93C to -43C
* Amount of incident light reflected (albedo) is just 6%
* A full rotation of the body takes just over 12.4 hours
* The axis of rotation runs through the "neck" region
* Its larger lobe ("body") is about 4.1 × 3.3 × 1.8 km
* The smaller lobe ("head") is about 2.6 × 2.3 × 1.8 km
* Gravity measurements give a mass of 10 billion tonnes
* Mapping estimates the volume to be about 21.4 cubic km
* The density works out at about 470kg per cubic metre
* This would imply that Comet 67P is highly porous
* It is 70-80% empty space, but are there big voids inside?
* Daytime surface temperatures range from -93C to -43C
* Amount of incident light reflected (albedo) is just 6%
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 2:23 pm
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
That's quite an amazing morphological similarity, uncanny. It appears the processes for this morphology are the same.Steve Smith wrote:25143 Itokawa looks a lot like 67P/C-G:
http://www.eso.org/public/archives/imag ... o1405b.jpg
-
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:07 am
- Location: Honey Brook
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
Comet springs surprise: Rosetta and Philae find Comet 67P not magnetised
http://phys.org/news/2015-04-comet-rose ... tised.html
http://phys.org/news/2015-04-comet-rose ... tised.html
Instead, the magnetic field that was measured was consistent with an external one, namely the influence of the solar wind interplanetary magnetic field near the comet nucleus. This conclusion is confirmed by the fact that variations in the field that were measured by Philae closely agree with those seen at the same time by Rosetta
- FS3
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:44 pm
- Location: Europe
- Contact:
Re: 'Welease Wosetta!'
That's conclusive with the EU-theories, as there is no need for an intrinsic magnetic field - due to the relatively small nucleus - but an ongoing upbuilding due to the activities of the solar "wind" that triggers the double layer around the nucleus, see the paper: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early ... ce.aaa5102flyingcloud wrote:Comet springs surprise: Rosetta and Philae find Comet 67P not magnetised
http://phys.org/news/2015-04-comet-rose ... tised.html
Instead, the magnetic field that was measured was consistent with an external one, namely the influence of the solar wind interplanetary magnetic field near the comet nucleus. This conclusion is confirmed by the fact that variations in the field that were measured by Philae closely agree with those seen at the same time by Rosetta
This observation contradicts and nullifies the standard theorie for creation of comets from planetary nebular discs as gravitational pull was only considered to be important from 100 meters diameter on. Below that border "different mechanisms" do play a role - although no one knows what those mechanisms are......Based on magnetic field measurements during the descent and subsequent multiple touchdown of the Rosetta lander Philae on the comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, we show that no global magnetic field was detected within the limitations of analysis. The ROMAP suite of sensors measured an upper magnetic field magnitude of less than 2 nT at the cometary surface at multiple locations with the upper specific magnetic moment being < 3.1·10−5 Am2/kg for meter-size homogeneous magnetized boulders. The maximum dipole moment of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko is 1.6·108 Am2. We conclude that on the meter-scale, magnetic alignment in the pre-planetary nebula is of minor importance...
FS3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests