I can feel it..
I'm electrosensitive too, but not to the extend that it hurts or burns.
Wifi and celltowers are terrible. I can't stand them for long.
It seems that I am more sensitive to the (alternating) magnetic part of the radiation.
I am also educated in Electromagnetism on the university. So it actually something
I have learned a lot about EM-radiation and circuits.
Official fake scientific researchThe official scientific theory on this topic is rather stupid. They model the radiation as heat.
And the biological body as a container of water. So it is clear that nothing comes out of that model.
A lot of publications are on:
http://www.microwavenews.comHere we can see that often the researchers find some problems with the radiation,
but have no clue.
Also some researchers do bad research and place the test-group next to the exposed
group, so they measure no differences at all.
Only a few researchers keep their tests totally radiation free.
Real scientific research:There was a very interesting old book in the university about Biology and Magnetism.
They could find that a lot of biological systems were sensitive to magnetism.
The problem was that most molecules in biology are not very sensitive to magnetism at all.
And because biology is considered as chemical only, the science around it stopped.
Sadly, I could not find the book back after a few years.
The new findings in "quantum biology" are very interesting. They show that biology uses special
tricks to increase the sensitivity to magnetism. Birds are probably using such tricks to navigate.
I think that these quantum tricks are going one step further. I think that biology is not only sensitive to
magnetism, but also to electromagnetic radiation. And I think that these are used in all kinds of
biological processes.
My own simple model:Even without going into biological quantum trickery, we can see that certain components in the body
might be antenna like.
For radiation to be effective one needs:
1. Some kind of antenna. Something that is receptive to the EM-radiation.
2. A resonator. Something that resonates with the frequency of the EM-radiation and is affected by it.
3. Minimal damping or even amplification of the vibration.
4. Some kind of reaction to this vibration.
->1. Possible antennas:
a) the nerve system
b) the microtubules system
c) the DNA
->2. resonators:
a) the ions in the nerves (K+).
b) the ions in the microtubules.
c) the DNA itself. Probably more sensitive during cell-division.
->3. Damping/amplification factors.
a) neurons amplify the signals, and use all kinds of feed-back loops.
b) certain reaction cycles within the cell might amplify the signal.
damping unknown.
c) damping minimal: DNA might be superconductor
amplification: DNA-copying might use certain frequencies.
->4. Reaction.
a) stress, concentration changes, memory problems.
(These have all been observed in test-subjects).
Can also give burning sensations.
b) all kinds of problems within cells.
c) DNA-breakage, or failures during copying.
(causes the observed increase in certain cancers).
So with my own simple model, I have already identified the problems that might occur with
EM-radiation. And indeed we can see that they do occur.
But it is very hard to break the mainstream foolishness on this subject.
Many scientists also prefer to hold on to the chemical model of the human body,
which is clearly incomplete, and false in this case.
A lot of scientists are not sensitive to EM-radiation at all. That is probably because you
need to be a sensitive person to begin with.
Within the test-group of people that do yoga and/or mediations I find that half of them
are sensitive to some form of EM-radiation.