Plasma Cosmology vs the Big Bang

What is a human being? What is life? Can science give us reliable answers to such questions? The electricity of life. The meaning of human consciousness. Are we alone? Are the traditional contests between science and religion still relevant? Does the word "spirit" still hold meaning today?

Moderators: bboyer, MGmirkin

Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 10:25 am

Plasma Cosmology vs the Big Bang

Unread post by intihana » Sun Mar 24, 2013 4:57 pm

Plasma Cosmology vs the Big Bang (theory of how the universe came to be)? I don't see a reason for why both can not happen at the same time. There would be no vortex, swirl, plasma if there are no bang. The thinking of plasma materialize out of nowhere is weird. However, both contradict law of conservation.

User avatar
Posts: 1255
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:01 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Plasma Cosmology vs the Big Bang

Unread post by D_Archer » Mon Mar 25, 2013 6:34 am

Plasma cosmology has no theoretical beginning, the universe is of an unknown age and extent.
Big Bang has a theoretical beginning, the universe has a known age and is limited in extent.

There could not be more difference, the theories are not reconcilable.

- Shoot Forth Thunder -

Posts: 3517
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:20 pm

Re: Plasma Cosmology vs the Big Bang

Unread post by Sparky » Mon Mar 25, 2013 11:19 am

The big bang model is nonsense. Red shift theory has been falsified, and that takes big bang down with it. :roll:
"It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests