danejean wrote:Hi All
Being new to this forum and after a quick reading(too quick I confess) I would like to know if ever the plasmic cosmos and electric universe are a new definition of the Aether of the ancients?
I hope I am hurting anyone.
Best
Dane
danejean wrote:Hi All
Being new to this forum and after a quick reading(too quick I confess) I would like to know if ever the plasmic cosmos and electric universe are a new definition of the Aether of the ancients?
I hope I am hurting anyone.
Best
Dane
Matter and mass
Gravity acts in proportion to the mass of an object. What do we mean when we refer to the ‘mass’ of an object? "One of the most astonishing features of the history of physics is the confusion which surrounds the definition of the key term in dynamics, mass."[13] Early in the 20th century numerous textbooks equated the mass of an object to its weight. That equation led to confusion because it doesn’t explain why the mass of an object we measure on a weighing machine (gravitational mass) is identical to the mass of that object when we push it (inertial mass).
Ultimately cosmology must have no loose ends. The electric universe model is an attempt to connect many strands of knowledge. “Proposals that eventually pan out in the world are far more likely to exhibit narrative consistency - perhaps what Edward O. Wilson calls ‘consilience’ in his book of that name.”[27] “The goal of consilience is to achieve progressive unification of all strands of knowledge in service to the indefinite betterment of the human condition.”[28]
Big bang cosmologists have no narrative that can compete. But by the simple act of ignoring alternatives they reject them—if the public simply acquiesce and do not speak up.
Wal Thornhill
Orlando wrote:Symbols=Letters
letters make sounds
sounds make words
words make sentences
A sentence is a complete thought!
There are no wrong theories
junglelord wrote:aether is a 2 spin rotating magnetic field, quite real, contrary to alton's dismissal.
StevenO wrote:junglelord wrote:aether is a 2 spin rotating magnetic field, quite real, contrary to alton's dismissal.
Nope, the aether is a scalar motion at unit speed c and only motions differing from that are real.
Time for a new vocabulary?
Solar wrote:StevenO wrote:junglelord wrote:aether is a 2 spin rotating magnetic field, quite real, contrary to alton's dismissal.
Nope, the aether is a scalar motion at unit speed c and only motions differing from that are real.
Time for a new vocabulary?
Nope. The Aether is a superluminal scalar motion of ambipolar 'radiation' and only motion differing from that are apparent.
junglelord wrote:I believe it is clear that EM charge is the cause of the "strong force".
I believe that ES Charge must be quantified. It is at present, not a quantified force.
The so called weak force is the proportional difference b/t EM and ES charge.
Mass is the linear aspect of EM charge. The rmf of the aether is the field observed b/t two magnets.
It is easy to prove that the aether has a conductance. The constants of the quantum domain, namely the Compton Wavelength for length, Coluombs constant for charge, the mass of the e- and the p+ are the two masses of the universe.
Neutrons do not exist alone and in 14 minutes they dissolve into a e-, p+ and the angular momentum of a neutrino.
The neutron is the result of aether folding. The e- and p+ are the result of encapsulation, like a spirograph.
Phi, Pi, e are the natural generators of the universe due to the spin ratios b/t 2spin rmf of aether and the intger 1/2 of the angular momentum that is encapsulated. This produces PHI on the second cycle. How perfect.
StevenO wrote:- If the aether has conductance why do I measure infinite resistance if I put my ohm meter into a vacuum?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest