Politics Controls Science: Global Warming Hype is Proof

Has science taken a wrong turn? If so, what corrections are needed? Chronicles of scientific misbehavior. The role of heretic-pioneers and forbidden questions in the sciences. Is peer review working? The perverse "consensus of leading scientists." Good public relations versus good science.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
Lloyd
Posts: 4433
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:54 pm

Politics Controls Science: Global Warming Hype is Proof

Unread post by Lloyd » Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:55 pm

- Here are 5 paragraphs from an article at http://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2007/ ... sworth.pdf which explains how and why the global warming fraud has been perpetrated. I think the promoters of this article use pretty good scientific method.
With the stock market collapse of 1987, the international financiers were forced to escalate their looting operations to keep the entire monetary system from collapsing. In order to do so, and to convince developing nations that backwardness was to their advantage, several initiatives were launched: Thatcher organized the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and appointed John Houghton co-chairman; he also held the position of Chairman of Scientific Assessment until 2002. Sept. 27, 1988, in a speech to the Royal Society of London, replete with lies, Thatcher said: “For generations we have assumed that the efforts of mankind would leave the fundamental equilibrium of the world’s systems and atmosphere stable. But it is possible that with all these enormous changes (population, agricultural, use of fossil fuels) concentrated into such a short period of time, we have unwittingly begun a massive experiment with the system of this planet itself. Recently, three changes in atmospheric chemistry have become familiar subjects of concern. The first is the increase in the greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, methane, and chlorofluorocarbons, which has led some to fear that we are creating a global heat trap which could lead to climatic instability. And half the carbon emitted since the Industrial Revolution remains in the atmosphere. We have an extensive research programme at our meteorological office for the study of climate change.”

At the same time as the launching of the IPCC, Gore, on behalf of and in conjunction with the British Crown, was organizing GLOBE (the group addressed last month by Paul Wolfowitz). Maurice Strong, who was already a close acquaintance of Gore, told EIR in a 1999 interview that, “he was very active in the [GLOBE] movement, and, in fact, was instrumental in helping to form [it]. He was the original co-chairman and the driving force in getting it moving. Al was very influential around the world for this.” The key financial affiliations of GLOBE indicate its genocidal and rapacious agenda: the British imperial assets Anglo-American and British Petroleum. Strong, who chaired the Rio Summit, continued: “Gore was very active in the U.S. political movement to endorse [the 1992 Rio Summit] and to get it approved by the United Nations. And, then, subsequently, he was extremely active in helping to shape its agenda and helping to assure that it got the attention that it did.” It was in 1992 that Gore published his Malthusian diatribe, Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit, in which he advocated mass population reduction by as many as 2 billion people (see box).

From the late 1980s onward, the British and their global web of agents and organizations would drive the issue of climate change to the forefront of international politics. Tickell at the UN would be instrumental in this, as would Gore in the United States; Maurice Strong, from within the UN, would mobilize entire national bureaucracies. All of these men, in conjunction with Prince Philip’s 1001 Club, were also promoting the pagan doctrine of the Gaea “Mother Earth” cult as a new form of global religion to replace the “outdated” Judeo Christian concept of man as made in the creative image of God.

Elaine Dewar, in Cloak of Green, noted the impact of the Rio Conference, chaired by Strong, as a watershed in the fight over global warming and the world economy:

“The Rio Summit would take long steps towards a world in which nation states have withered away in favor of supranational and global institutions. Advertised as the World’s Greatest Summit, Rio was publicly described as a global negotiation to reconcile the need for environmental protection with the need for economic growth. The cognoscenti understood that there were other, deeper goals. These involved the shift of national regulatory powers to vast regional authorities; the opening of all remaining closed national economies to multinational interests; the strengthening of decision making structures far above and far below the grasp of newly minted national democracies; and, above all, the integration of the Soviet and Chinese into the global market system” (emphasis added). It was Strong, who at this summit declared that industrialized nation-states, and in particular the United States, posed the greatest threat to humankind, and therefore, humanity had an obligation to destroy them:

“The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation. It is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security.” Later he continued, “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring [this] about?”
- Len Horowitz's books and many others tend to confirm this conspiracy. See http://tetrahedron.org. It's well known that the Nazis were involved in a conspiracy for world domination and genocide. What's very little known is that British and American elitists financed the Nazis and have long promoted the same cause. Until scientists can face reality, they will never succeed at getting science back to the scientific method.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests