Gravity Test / Boyd Bushman

[lizzie]

If we look at what Tesla is supposed to have said about gravity, will that help?

Tesla talks about the “tubes of force”

Electrostatic Induction
http://www.regentsprep.org/Regents/phys ... induct.htm

Solenoid
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hb ... enoid.html

Solenoid as an Inductor
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hb ... ol.html#c1

Magnetohydrodynamics
http://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/phys/mhd.htm

Tubes of Force
http://tubesofforce.blogspot.com/2007/0 ... force.html

A tube of force, also called a tube of electrostatic induction or field tube, are the lines of electric force which move so that its beginning traces a closed curve on a positive surface, its end will trace a corresponding closed curve on the negative surface, and the line of force itself will generate an inductive tubular surface. Such a tube is called a "Solenoid". There is a pressure at right angles to a tube of force of one half the product of the dielectric and magnetic density. If through the growth of a field the tubes of force are spread sideways or in width there is a magnetic reaction to that growth in intensity of electric current. However, if a tube of force is caused to move endwise there is little or no drag to limit velocity. Tubes of force are absorbed by bodies imparting momentum and gravitational mass.

Tesla - Dynamic Theory of Gravity
http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia ... of_Gravity

Dynamic Theory of Gravity, Part 1
http://tubesofforce.blogspot.com/2007/0 ... art-1.html

Dynamic Theory of Gravity, Part 2
http://tubesofforce.blogspot.com/2007/0 ... art-2.html

Dynamic Theory of Gravity, Part 3
http://tubesofforce.blogspot.com/2007/0 ... art-3.html

We can conceive lines or tubes of force which physically exist, being formed of rows of directed moving molecules; we can see that these lines must be closed, that they must tend to shorten and expand, etc. It likewise explains in a reasonable way, the most puzzling phenomenon of all, permanent magnetism, and, in general, has all the beauties of the Ampere theory without possessing the vital defect of the same, namely, the assumption of molecular currents. I look upon all electrostatic, current and magnetic phenomena as being due to electrostatic molecular forces

Dynamic Theory of Gravity, Part 4
http://tubesofforce.blogspot.com/2007/0 ... art-4.html

The electrostatic charges "carried around" are currents between atoms and the ether, which produce magnetism. The phenomena of 'permanent magnetism' or 'cosmically induced' magnetism are apparently due to electrostatic charges 'carried around' by cosmic motion, in the universal ether field.

The ether is a universal medium, which fills all space. It appears to be "dynamic" relative to an earth moving thousands of miles per hour through space. The ether is normally electrically neutral, ultra-fine, and penetrates all solid matter. There is also an ultra high frequency, ubiquitous radiation, normally in equilibrium, called Zero Point Radiation ("ZPR"), which interpenetrates the ether, and represents electromagnetic radiation in its finest, densest form, which, in conjunction with the ether, conserves universal perpetual motion.

Since all solid matter is continually hurling through space, always in motion, it is always subjected to the "etheric wind" and ZPR interactions. These effects are not perceived except during changes in the orientation of mass or its velocity. All mass and space have dielectric properties. Differences in dielectric properties cause changes in the electromagnetic displacement within mass and the etheric wind. Earth's electric field creates dielectric displacement effects within ether and mass within earth's electric field. The difference between the dielectric displacement within a mass and the dielectric displacement outside the mass in the etheric wind creates a down-force in the direction of the negative polarity as the etheric wind 'blows' through a mass. This is called "gravity".

Since all mass is in motion, all mass has momentum, even when apparently "at rest" relative to earth. Momentum is a body's resistance to change in its state of motion. Since inertia is also the resistance of a body to changes in its momentum, inertia and momentum are due to the same thing, the resistance of electromagnetic micro helical tubules to changes in velocity (and relative "pitch"), direction, and lateral motions or orientation. Since all space and mass is composed only of "electric content", momentum/inertia is electromagnetic in nature, and can be electromagnetically synthesized.

All mass contains electrostatic charges which, when "carried around" in the ether/ZPR-filled space by celestial or 'local' movement, constitute currents. These currents actually flow between mass and the ether, and are integral to the mechanism by which momentum is imparted to mass in motion. The currents create magnetic fields as their equal-and-opposite counterparts, and give a rotatory motion to combined, bi-directional electric and magnetic fields and currents, around irrotational vacuous ether cores. This rotatory electromagnetic action creates momentum, as the force-free "screw-type" reaction within mass, creating its motion relative to the ether cores, from which the mechanical force is transferred to the atomic mass with which the electromagnetism is associated.

Since these phenomena are electromagnetic in nature, they are synthesized by recreation of the electromagnetic conditions which a body would exhibit due to a particular kinetic state. Just as electromagnetic waves of low frequency can penetrate a body, waves of higher frequencies - above I.R. and below U.V.- can cause the ether to "assert its inertia resistance".

The technology involves high voltage D.C. 'brush' currents, high frequency currents, rapidly varying electrostatic forces, and light/heat beams. The rapidly varying electrostatic forces "rarify" (stretch) the ether carriers, as the light/heat beams polarize the medium in the desired direction, as the D.C. brush currents induce the exchange of carriers, creating a vacuum in that direction, inducing motion. At the opposite end of the ship, high frequency currents draw the carriers through the ship, and create a compression of the ether, as it penetrates the solid mass and synthesizes the rotatory micro helical tubules, which whirl around the ether cores along the polar axis, at a pitch corresponding to a particular rate of momentum. Since the strength of the electromagnetic interaction is 10/40 time greater than the gravitational interaction, that much more work can theoretically be done in the same time using the same "energy".

[junglelord]

great post lizzy...I have to read the links. But I wanted to say this after my thoughts today on the universe and the structure of the aether and the sea of neutrinos. Especially after my talk with Dave Smith about the words Force, Field, Aether, EM, Neutrinos

CONCLUSION

The ether is a universal medium, which fills all space. It appears to be "dynamic" relative to an earth moving thousands of miles per hour through space. The ether is normally electrically neutral, ultra-fine, and penetrates all solid matter. There is also an ultra high frequency, ubiquitous radiation, normally in equilibrium, called Zero Point Radiation ("ZPR"), which interpenetrates the ether, and represents electromagnetic radiation in its finest, densest form, which, in conjunction with the ether, conserves universal perpetual motion.

correct me if I am wrong but is that not a description of Neutrinos?

[lizzie]

correct me if I am wrong but is that not a description of Neutrinos?

That's exactly what I thought.

Tesla's Aether seems to consist of three components:

Neutral matter (neutrinos?)

ZPR - Zero Point Radiation (Radiant Energy?)

The Tubes of Force (spinning magnetic vortices?)

An Investigation of Negative Gravitational Propulsion
http://www.astrosciences.info/NegativeGrav.htm

The discoveries of physicist Townsend T. Brown in electro-gravitic phenomena, and countless scientists, engineers, and inventors who have considered the problem of gravity nullification as well as inertial nullification for the purpose of propelling an object of any mass to unlimited velocities has been studied and expounded on by a growing list of articles and books.

It is now known that space is not an empty container and is filled with energetic activity that we now refer to as the ZPE (Zero-Point Energy) which is herein considered to be activity in the space-ether substance which serves as the substrate of space-time.

There seems to be a growing preponderance of evidence that a space ether medium exists and that physical theories on gravitation, inertia, electromagnetism, and nuclear forces as well as cosmological theories will need to take account of these.

If a velocity-dependent medium such as the ether could be established by experiment, then it could open the door to alternative explanations to SR and GR regarding physical phenomena. If this ether is quantized, then we could explore the theoretical nature of a quantum ether. Is gravity a result of some state of the quantum ether?

Does the quantum ether explain inertia? What does an electric or magnetic field do to the state of the quantum ether? Are material particles some wave-state of the quantum ether? Can we unify physical principles by considering a quantum ether?

A complete theory of the ether would not only account for the origin of forces, but the origin of matter and mass. Past theorizing has postulated the existence of circulating flows in a hydrodynamic ether that form hollow or ring vortices that give rise to electromagnetic forces and constitute the elementary particles that make-up the atomic nature of the world. Experiments conducted on the alternating gradient synchrotron with colliding protons seem to indicate that protons behave like composite vortices as described by Helmholtz and others in their excellent treatises on hydrodynamics

The many versions of the new String theories treat the electron as an extended 1-dimensional string or loop, and some variations treat it as a 2-dimesional structure including a ring-like vortex structure. Lord Kelvin was the first to propose a vortex ring as a model for the electron. This seems to be undergoing a revival in new proposals in string theory, now known as M-Theory.

The new popular notion of the aether is embodied in the concept of Zero Point Energy (ZPE) and the Zero Point Field (ZPF), however I have written that I believe ZPE is the activity we detect in the Aether and not the Aether per se. My model of the Aether is of a superfluid substance that constitutes physical space itself.

My suggestion is that the quantized vortices that form in a superfluid are those that, in the space-ether superfluid, compose the elementary particles. The assembly and aggregation of these vortices produce mass. Mass displaces the surrounding unaggregated fluid which then exerts pressure against the mass. We can then combine the stress-energy tensor of mass and pressure to arrive at equation

Flowing Gravity is based on a general hypothesis that space has physical properties that can best be described as super fluidic. By postulating the superfluid nature of space problems in controlling gravity and inertia can be clearly approached.

In aether theory, elementary particles are considered vortices. The electron is considered to be either a toroidal vortex (a theory I favor) or a spherical vortex. The proton and neutron are considered to be compound vortices composed of electron and positron vortices. The vortex circulation creates a void core which reduces aetheric pressure to a null state and produces an inward-directed aetheric static pressure from ambient space which gives us gravitational and inertial force. The dynamic rotation of the toroid produces an outward-directed dynamic pressure which gives us the electric field while the circulation of the toroid produces an axial magnetic field. This is a simplified version of a model which we will use to visualize field propulsion in a saucer-shaped craft that utilizes this knowledge to produce a gravitationally-repulsive force for propulsion.

[StefanR]

What is an Eddy Current?

An eddy current is the current is induced in little swirls ("eddies") on a large conductor (picture a sheet of copper).

If a large conductive metal plate is moved through a magnetic field which intersects perpendicularly to the sheet, the magnetic field will induce small "rings" of current which will actually create internal magnetic fields opposing the change. This is why a large sheet of metal swung through a strong magnetic field will stop as it starts to move through the field. All of its kinetic energy will cause a major change in the magnetic field as it enters it which will induce rings of current which will oppose the surrounding magnetic field and slow the object down. In effect, the kinetic energy will go into driving small currents inside the metal which will give off that energy as heat as they push through the metal.

If this isn't a satisfying answer, consider a simple wire loop being moved through a magnetic field. If you've learned anything about motors and/or generators, you will have probably learned that a current will be induced in this loop in a similar fashion. Likewise, a wire loop being pushed into a magnetic field will induce a current which will make it difficult to continue pushing. Likewise, it will resist being pulled out as well. An eddy current does the same thing, but instead of being forced in the path of the loop, it is allowed to travel in the "eddy" pattern that nature provides.

To get rid of eddy currents, slits can be cut in metals so that large eddies cannot occur. This is why the metal cores of transformers are often assembled in small laminations with an insulator in between. This prevents AC energy from being lost to eddies generated within the magnetic core (which typically is also conductive because it is a metal like iron).

Now, sometimes eddy currents are a good thing. Mentioned above, eddy currents help turn kinetic energy quickly into other forms of energy. Because of this, braking systems have been created which take advantage of it. Adding a magnetic field around a spinning piece of metal will cause eddy currents in that metal to create magnetic fields which will slow the object spinning down quickly as long as the magnetic is strong enough.

Now, this can be taken one step farther and a circuit can be built which shuffles kinetic energy turned into electrical energy back into a battery. This is what many Hybrid cars do (and Dean Kamen's "Segway" not only when it is stopping but when it is going downhill).

http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae572.cfm

Eddy Current Losses in Transformer Windings and Circuit Wiring

Introduction
As switching power supply operating frequencies
increase, eddy current losses and
parasitic inductances can greatly impair circuit
performance. These high frequency effects are
caused by the magnetic field resulting from
current flow in transformer windings and circuit
wiring.
This paper is intended to provide insight into
these phenomena so that improved high frequency.
performance can be achieved. Among
other things, it explains (I) why eddy current
losses increase so dramatically with more winding
layers, (2) why parallelling thin strips doesn't
work, (3) how passive conductors (Faraday
shields and C. T .windings) have high losses,
and (4) why increasing conductor surface area
will actually worsen losses and parasitic inductance
if the configuration is not correct

http://focus.ti.com/lit/ml/slup197/slup197.pdf

An eddy current (also known as Foucault current) is an electrical phenomenon discovered by French physicist Léon Foucault in 1851. It is caused when a moving (or changing) magnetic field intersects a conductor, or vice-versa. The relative motion causes a circulating flow of electrons, or current, within the conductor. These circulating eddies of current create electromagnets with magnetic fields that opposes the change of the magnetic field (see Lenz's law). The stronger the applied magnetic field, or greater the electrical conductivity of the conductor, or greater the relative velocity of motion, the greater the currents developed and the greater the opposing field.

Eddy currents are created when a moving conductor experiences changes in the magnetic field generated by a stationary object, as well as when a stationary conductor encounters a varying magnetic field. Both effects are present when a conductor moves through a varying magnetic field, as is the case at the top and bottom edges of the magnetized region shown in the diagram. Eddy currents will be generated wherever a conducting object experiences a change in the intensity or direction of the magnetic field at any point within it, and not just at the boundaries.

The swirling current set up in the conductor is due to electrons experiencing a Lorentz force that is perpendicular to their motion. Hence, they veer to their right, or left, depending on the direction of the applied field and whether the strength of the field is increasing or declining. The resistivity of the conductor acts to damp the amplitude of the eddy currents, as well as straighten their paths. Lenz's law encapsulates the fact that the current swirls in such a way as to create an induced magnetic field that opposes the phenomenon that created it. In the case of a varying applied field, the induced field will always be in the opposite direction to that applied. The same will be true when a varying external field is increasing in strength. However, when a varying field is falling in strength, the induced field will be in the same direction as that originally applied, in order to oppose the decline.

Sometimes an object or part of an object experiences steady field intensity and direction where there is still relative motion of the field and the object (for example in the center of the field in the diagram), or unsteady fields where the currents cannot circulate due to the geometry of the conductor. In these situations charges collect on or within the object and these charges then produce static electric potentials that oppose any further flow of current. Currents may be initially associated with the creation of static potentials, but these may be transitory and small.

Eddy currents transform useful forms of energy, such as kinetic energy, into heat, which is generally much less useful. In many devices, this Joule heating reduces efficiency of iron-core transformers and electric motors and other devices that changing magnetic fields. Eddy currents are minimized in these devices by selecting magnetic core materials that have low electrical conductivity (e.g., ferrites) or by using thin sheets of magnetic material, known as laminations. Electrons cannot cross the insulating gap between the laminations and so are unable to circulate on wide arcs. Charges gather at the lamination boundaries, in a process analogous to the Hall effect, producing electric fields that oppose any further accumulation of charge and hence suppressing the flow of eddy currents. The shorter the distance between adjacent laminations (i.e., the greater the number of laminations per unit area, perpendicular to the applied field), the greater the suppression of eddy currents.

The loss of useful energy is not always undesirable, however, as there are some practical applications. One is in the brakes of some trains known as an eddy current brake.During braking, the metal wheels are exposed to a magnetic field from an electromagnet, generating eddy currents in the wheels.The eddy currents meet resistance as they flow through the metal, thus dissipating energy as heat, and this acts to slow the wheels down.The faster the wheels are spinning, the stronger the effect, meaning that as the train slows the braking force is reduced, producing a smooth stopping motion.

The term eddy current comes from analogous currents seen in water when dragging an oar: localised areas of turbulence known as eddies give rise to persistent vortices.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_current

Applications

Electrical
Eddy currents are used to great effect in movement-to-electricity converters such as electrical generators and dynamic microphones.

Repulsive effects/levitation
Superconductors allow perfect, lossless conduction, which creates perpetually circulating eddy currents that are equal and opposite to the external magnetic field, thus allowing magnetic levitation. For the same reason, the magnetic field inside a superconducting medium will be exactly zero, regardless of the external applied field.

In addition, in a fast varying magnetic field the induced currents, in good conductors, particularly copper and aluminium, exhibit diamagnetic-like repulsion effects on the magnetic field, and hence on the magnet and can create repulsive effects and even stable levitation, albeit with reasonably high power dissipation due to the high currents this entails.

They can thus be used to induce a magnetic field in aluminum cans, which allows them to be separated easily from other recyclables.

Mechanical
Eddy currents are used for braking at the end of some roller coasters. This mechanism has no mechanical wear and produces a very precise braking force. Typically, heavy copper plates extending from the car are moved between pairs of very strong permanent magnets. Electrical resistance within the plates causes a dragging effect analogous to friction, which dissipates the kinetic energy of the car.

Structural Testing
Eddy current techniques are commonly used for the nondestructive examination (NDE) and condition monitoring of a large variety of metallic structures, including heat exchanger tubes, aircraft fuselage, and aircraft structural components.

Side Effects
Eddy currents are the root cause of the skin effect in conductors carrying AC current.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_current

Eddy current occurs at the metal in the vicinity of a tag, caused by the Reader/Writer's magnetic field. This magnetic field (demagnetizing field) caused by the eddy current cancels the magnetic filed necessary for communication.

Search for
Home Membership Palm Store Forum Search Member Calculators

Materials
Design
Processes
Units
Formulas
Math

Effective Depth

An eddy current is a local electric current induced in a conductive material by the magnetic field produced by the active coil. This local electric current in turn induces a magnetic field opposite in sense to the one from the active coil and reduces the inductance in the coil. When the distance between the target and the probe changes, the impedance of the coil changes correspondingly. This change in impedance can be detected by a carefully arranged bridge circuit.

The eddy currents are confined to shallow depths near the conductive target surface. Their effective depth is given by,

where f is the excitation frequency of the circuit, µ is the magnetic permeability of the target material, and s is the conductivity of the target material.

The target material must be at least three times thicker than the effective depth of the eddy currents to make the transducer successful. This is because the transducer assumes that the eddy currents are localized near the surface of a semi-infinite solid, and the actual eddy current amplitude decreases quadratically with distance.
----------
The Eddy Current Transducer uses the effect of eddy (circular) currents to sense the proximity of non-magnetic but conductive materials. A typical eddy current transducer contains two coils: an active coil (main coil) and a balance coil. The active coil senses the presence of a nearby conductive object, and balance coil is used to balance the output bridge circuit and for temperature compensation.

http://www.efunda.com/designstandards/s ... _intro.cfm

Eddy current is used to detect surface cracks, pits, subsurface cracks, corrosion on inner surfaces, and to determine alloy and heat-treat condition.

A wide variety of eddy current test instruments are available. The eddy current test instrument performs three basic functions: generating, receiving, and displaying. The generating portion of the unit provides an alternating current to the test coil. The receiving section processes the signal from the test coil to the required form and amplitude for display. Instrument outputs or displays consist of a variety of visual, audible, storage, or transfer techniques utilizing meters, video displays, chart recorders, alarms, magnetic tape, computers, and electrical or electronic relays.

Principles of Operations: Eddy currents are induced in a test article when an alternating current is applied to a test coil (probe). The alternating current in the coil induces an alternating magnetic field in the article which causes eddy currents to flow in the article.

Generating an Eddy Current

Detecting an Eddy Current

http://www.engineersedge.com/inspection/eddycurrent.htm

Coilgun Basics (3 of 3)

The Induction Coilgun

The classical tubular induction coilgun is essentially identical to the simple reluctance coilgun in terms of its general construction. The difference is that the projectile is repelled out of the coil through the action of eddy currents induced in the projectile. The projectile must be non-ferromagnetic (e.g. copper or aluminium) and the starting position needs to be slightly off-centre in the coil otherwise it wont experience a net force when the coil is fired. The impulse experienced by the projectile depends on mutual inductance and magnetic diffusion processes, which must be taken into account to effect a good design. When a multistage launcher is designed, the individual drive coils can be made short compared to the projectile length, allowing a smoother acceleration profile.

It should also be noted that the projectile need not be a solid conductor - a projectile comprising a coil shorted on itself can also be used and offers efficiency advantages[1]. The projectile can also be tubular where it rides a cavity formed by the drive coils and an inner, rifled mandrel. The mandrel provides support to the projectile against the radial component of the driving force, while also imparting spin. This particular configuration has been termed the Theta Gun[2].

http://www.coilgun.eclipse.co.uk/coilgun_basics_3.html

[webolife]

lizzie and junglelord, great posts!
Tesla's force tubes, along with their induced magnetic vortices, are exactly the picture I have forming around my "conical" pressure "beams". For all intents and purposes, at any given scale, my pressure beams with a [planck] point apex and [indefinite local unit] base area would appear as tubes. The Solenoid analogy is how vectors work across distance, with insignificant velocity measured longitudinally [aka instantaneous action] and the induced magnetic vortices, StefanR's "eddy currents", fit the energy vortex picture junglelord has been touting eloquently. ZPR and "neutrinos" [are attempts to] particalize/aetherize my unified field vectors which permeate all space and matter, without needing to be particles [or waves]. I may be all wrong [I know, most of you are convinced I am! ] but this just points out further to me the need to try to begin unifying [at least organizing] our vocabulary as a starter for creating a truly comprehensible TOE.

[lizzie]

Video - The Case for Anti-Gravity
http://www.exopolitics.org.uk/video-%11 ... 11gravity/

[lizzie]

Walter Wright's Push Gravity
http://keelynet.com/gravity/wright.htm

Walter Wright, 60, says he isn't arguing that gravity doesn't exist, only that it works in reverse from the way Newton thought - by 'pushing' objects apart rather than 'pulling them together.

Wright's basic idea -- which he says is borne out by his experiments and calculations -- is that gravity doesn't emanate from the earth's core, it comes from the sun.

He argues that the sun, because it is a huge mass in a constant state of combustion, emits forces which push or 'squeeze' objects toward the earth -- like Newton's apple.

He uses galaxies passing through each other in deep space as an illustration of his ideas. The stars usually don't collide because they REPEL or PUSH EACH OTHER APART, he said.

Decker's Anti-Gravity Correlatives
http://www.keelynet.com/gravity/deckcorr.htm

[junglelord]

I remember looking at that in 2000. I think that while interesting is not correct. I am sure that APM has quantified gravity and all the other forces. I did put a post from a reply by Dave Thomson above. I will post more tomorrow in the APM thread. I think if anything it is as Wal Thornhill describes, both a push and a pull.

[lizzie]

Free Energy, Gravity and the Aether
http://www.keelynet.com/davidson/npap1.htm

My research and discoveries have led me to characterize the aether as follows:

1. A superfluidic particulate medium which pervades all space.
2. A medium, which in its various modes, is the building block of the physical universe.
3. A medium, which, in one of its modes, is responsible for gravity and inertia.
4. A medium which is controllable by our mind and can be manipulated by our thoughts.
5. A medium which can be controlled by geometric shapes.

The charge of matter is due to its interchange with aether. Electrons as well as the other subatomic particles are basically self-sustaining vortices in a fluidic particulate aether.

The electron is a vortex of aether caught in a rotating standing wave due to the vibrating flow of aether which flows into and out of the atom's nucleus.

Atomic structure builds according to the rules of geometry and the basic polarity of atomic particles. Polarities are the result of aetheric flows into and out of matter.

Gravity:

The gravitation constant as grad E correlates with the seminal work by T. Townsend Brown. Brown discovered that a capacitor will tend to move in the direction of the positive plate.

Apparent weight loss is the result when the plates are perpendicular to the local gravity gradient. This effect can be enhanced by making one plate much smaller than the other plate. This essentially forces the grad E to maximize.

It should be noted that grad E is independent of whether the field is AC or DC. Experiments have shown that even with this enhancement the capacitor does not have all its apparent weight nullified and levitate.

The reason for this can be found again in the nuclear particle's relationship with the aether. Even though each atom is in constant resonance with the aether this resonance is not synchronized across the mass. Each atom is doing its own thing, so to speak, and there is a random interchange with the aether with respect to all the nuclei.

Thus, when a grad E acts as an aether pump across the capacitor plates only a small portion of the atoms become synchronized to this aetheric flow so the entire mass does not respond at the same time; therefore, all the atoms don't try and move at the same time.

Synchronization of the nuclei with the aether has been achieved by two main methods; namely, rotation or movement and sonically. Townsend Brown was quite open in publicizing his experimental results even though they were being funded in part by the Office of Naval Research out of San Diego.

However, when he started rotating his gravitors on their axis the results suddenly became classified and all information on his experiments ceased. It is suspected that major levitation resulted and this breakthrough was classified to protect the discovery so it could be exploited for national defense.

Analysis of the phenomenon of inertia provides the major clue to how rotation could act to synchronize the flow of aether into the nuclear sub-structure of the gravitors.

A seminal paper in Physical Review by Haisch, Rueda, and Puthoff theorizes that inertia is a result of mass's resistance of movement through the zero point energy (ZPE) field (i.e., the aether) because the mass, at the nuclear level, is linked directly into the aether.

Puthoff and his friends basically did a nice proof of what Keely stated, in 1896, that inertia was a result of the resistance of mass to the local aetheric field. Hence, it is easy to see that movement/rotation could cause the aetheric flows of the mass to reorient with respect to the direction of movement.

Sonic stimulation performs the same thing by getting all the atoms of the mass to resonate together which synchronizes aetheric flows into the nucleus. Several interesting levitation effects have been observed where sonic stimulation assisted in the levitation.

The Detection of Aetheric Gravity Flow Using Dielectrics:

By now it should be obvious that the larger the mass the more aether which flows into the atomic structure of the mass. Mass is both radiating and absorbing aetheric energy.

Other mass in the vicinity will cause perturbations in this aetheric flow. Because of this fact, aetheric flow detectors can be constructed by taking advantage of this principle.

My first working gravity or local aetheric stress/flow detector was demonstrated at the 1990 Extraordinary Science Conference in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

The basic principle of the gravity detector is the fact that the electronic charge structure of a given mass is a function of the amount of aether flowing into the mass. The charge around the atom is governed by the amount of aether flowing into and out of the mass. My reasoning was that dielectrics would make the best aetheric flow detector. Early success had been accomplished by Jerry Gallimore (circa 1975) and Townsend Brown (circa 1959) in using dielectric materials to detect local gravity effects.

In dielectrics the electronic charge is isolated and trapped within the dielectric material since the charge cannot flow and dissipate.

There are two basic types of force fields built up in and around the experiment. There is an ovoid shaped forcefield around each of the copper triangles.

When these small force fields build up in intensity they cause a drag on the motor which can be plainly heard in the lab.

What seems to be happening is the earth moves through energy conduits which go from our sun to other planets and star systems. When the gravity wheel experiment crosses one of these energy conduits, the forcefield around the copper triangles intensifies to the extent that the bubble starts moving either toward the conduit or away from the conduit very rapidly and a scale upset occurs.

[webolife]

Gravity push:

In my theory gravity is also a push, ie centropic pressure from the unified force field toward the center [centropic]... its balancing fundament is momentum, ie angular momentum, so "anti-gravity" is not needed or warranted. The observed "repulsion" in the solar/stellar field may be due to the stellar wind [sorry, some of you object to that terminology] as in traditional explanations, which is a Newton's 3rd law consequence of action/reacton due to the paramount centropic field, but also due to the exigent fact of competing adjacent local fields... the vectors of local field A are [centropically] directed toward centroid A, while the vectors of neighboring/intersecting field B are directed oppositely toward its centroid B. This seems to be the explanation for planetary orbital Lagrangian points, gravitational manifolds, and other exigent field quanta attributable simply to geometry. Ultimately, the universe is thereby squeezed together, with the net effect of centropy in every energy transaction, aka entropy. Excludes the Big B, but also shows that "antigravity" is just another name for "centifugal force".

[lizzie]

Progress in Electrogravitics and Electrokinetics for Aviation and Space Travel
http://www.integrityresearchinstitute.o ... Valone.pdf

Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a New Propulsion Methodology
http://www.etheric.com/LaVioletteBooks/Book-ES.html

Electrogravitics Systems
http://www.padrak.com/ine/INE24.html

Scientific Papers of Steven J. Smith
Electrogravitics - Part 1
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/eg1.html

Implicit in the term "Electrogravitics" is the assumption that electro-magnetism is the root cause of the gravitational effect.

The Atom as a gravitational field generator

On first approximation, the electron can be thought of as a "current loop" centered around the proton. This current loop will have a magnetic field associated with it. The geometry of the magnetic field is defined by the Left Hand Rule (it's negatively charged).

Electrogravitics – Part 2
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/eg2.html

In part 2 we will study the atom as the receiver of the electrogravitic field.

Electrogravitics - Part 3
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/eg3.html

In part 3 of this paper, we shall examine two devices. Both devices are widely documented, and both exhibit anomalous gravitational behavior

EHD/EAD Electrogravitics – JLN Labs - Researches and Experiments
http://members.fortunecity.com/jlnaudin ... dvprop.htm

The ElectroHydroDynamics ( E.H.D.) may open new ways in advanced propulsion. An EHD device uses a direct conversion of electrical energy into kinetic energy. A specially shaped electrostatic field creates a hydrostatic pressure (or motion) in dielectric media. If the media is a fluid like air (or aether), a flow is produced and this produces a motion of the device. A powered flow of medium (like air or aether) within a shaped electrostatic field adds energy to the system which is picked up (as potential difference) by electrodes and thus produces energy.

Plasma Balls and Fire Sheaths
http://www.aeronautics.ru/mach50.htm

1950s theoretical work in exotic propulsion embracing everything from nuclear-powered bombers to hydrogen burning spy -planes led in the 1960s to the practical development of hydrogen-fueled supersonic ramjets (scramjets). From tests that are still secret, results proved encouraging and various flying machines were built to prove the concept in flight. So encouraging were these flight tests, that the industry was committed to producing an exotic machine, called the ASP - AeroSpace Plane.

[lizzie]

Junglelord's Ether

The ether is a universal medium, which fills all space. It appears to be "dynamic" relative to an earth moving thousands of miles per hour through space. The ether is normally electrically neutral, ultra-fine, and penetrates all solid matter. There is also an ultra high frequency, ubiquitous radiation, normally in equilibrium, called Zero Point Radiation ("ZPR"), which interpenetrates the ether, and represents electromagnetic radiation in its finest, densest form, which, in conjunction with the ether, conserves universal perpetual motion.

William Lyne's Ether

I refer to the “omni-directionally interpenetrating radiation” not as “zero point energy” (ZPE) but rather “Zero Point Radiation” (ZPR). I also believe all space is saturated with ultra fine (normally) neutral matter (which also permeates all atomic matter). I refer to this as “Omni Matter.” This matter is activated by electromagnetic radiation, which is not in equilibrium, transmitting its forces through Omni Matter/space until it is absorbed by some ‘atomic’ matter or body. Likewise the ZPR is able to interpenetrate almost all mass because at such frequencies, its tiny wavelength passes between atoms without resonating with or reacting with them. There is an exception. According to Tesla, so-called “radioactive” elements reacting to the ZPR (are “…targets” continuously bombarded by “infinitesimal bullets projected from all parts of the universe”, without which “all radioactivity would cease”), which is the actual source of the radiation produced by them. Now there’s something to think about: What is the nature of the structure or status of ‘radioactive’ elements, which allows them to react energetically with the ZPR?

"Pentagon Aliens" - Pg 21

To Tesla, the ether was composed of “independent carriers,” that are “immersed in an insulating fluid”. While this ether behaves as a solid to “heat” and “light”, it behaves like a “fluid” to solid bodies which are allowed to pass through it.

Zero Point Radiation (ZPR) – high frequency electromagnetic radiation - dark energy or radiant energy (?) *

*Radiant Pressure Model of Remote Forces - Stan Byers:

Gravity and Inertia via Radiation
http://home.netcom.com/~sbyers11/

Neutral Matter – Neutrinos (?)

Tubes of Force – “atomic” vortices; “carriers of EM forces”; “magnetic flux tubes”; magnetic flux superconductors, vortex dynamos (?)

Flux tube dynamo approach to the solar cycle
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v2 ... 150a0.html

Metals, Magnetic Fields, and Superconductors
http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/education/tea ... esteel.ppt

Vortex dynamos
http://mae.ucsd.edu/~sgls/jfm498_1.pdf

The Hall Effect
http://www.pha.jhu.edu/~qiuym/qhe/node1.html

In 1930, Landau showed that for quantum electrons, unlike classical electrons, the electron's orbital motion gave a contribution to the magnetic susceptibility. He also remarked that the kinetic energy quantization gave rise to a contribution to the magnetic susceptibility which was periodic in inverse magnetic field. We can see later that Landau levels along with localization can explain the integer quantum Hall effect satisfactorily

http://chem.ch.huji.ac.il/history/hall.html

Edwin Herbert Hall was American physicist who discovered in 1879 the "Hall effect" - development of a transverse electric field in a solid material when it carries an electric current and is placed in a magnetic field that is perpendicular to the current

Hall discovered that a magnetic field would skew equipotential lines in a current-carrying conductor. This effect is observed as a voltage (Hall voltage) perpendicular to the direction of current in the conductor.

Magnetohydrodynamics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetohydrodynamics

The idea of MHD is that magnetic fields can induce currents in a moving conductive fluid, which create forces on the fluid, and also change the magnetic field itself. The set of equations which describe MHD are a combination of the Navier-Stokes equations of fluid dynamics and Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism.

J.J. Thomson
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/phys ... n-bio.html

Thomson's early interest in atomic structure was reflected in his Treatise on the Motion of Vortex Rings

Tesla coil

Since a permanent magnet is composed of a medium (iron, usually) which has been magnetically aligned or polarized, some of the interpenetration ZPR is arrested and separated into electric and magnetic components, and converted into magnetic flux, which is really a kind of “radioactivity”. The ZPR is the driving force behind this flux, which is strongest when aligned with the earth’s magnetic field, which in turn has polarized and converted some of the ZPR near or in the earth. The force of the flux will in turn separate into positive and negative electric charges, more or less as the reciprocal of the mechanism by which the force of the ZPR has been diverted to create the magnetic flux. A permanent magnet can also be thought of as a “magnetic flux superconductor” which, like an ultra high frequency antenna, received the ZPR and produces a magnetic flux.

Use of permanent magnets by Tesla across a spark gap discharge, was intended to use the Hall Effect to break the discharge by separating the positive and negative charges in order to produce a more perfect sine wave; Tesla discovered that electric spark discharges.

Atoms of iron are a ‘medium’ which have a peculiar capacity to capture and convert ZPR into magnetic flux which is always a secondary product of current. This means a magnet polarizes and unified the tubes of force associated with the independent ether carriers.

“Pentagon Aliens” – William Lyne

Pg 20

H.A. Lorentz had said that by simply increasing the negative “moving” charges (orbital electrons) attached to the “stationary” nuclear charges (protons and neutrons) of atoms the gravitational attractive force acting on the positive charges of the nuclear mass would be completely neutralized.

Pg 21

This gave rise to the catchy phrase, “An electrostatic charge carried around is a current.” Edwin H. Hall had done an experiment in which he had placed a gold leaf strip in which a current was flowing into a magnetic gap, producing an electromotive force at right angles to the magnetic field and the current, proportional to the product of the two. This is called the “Hall Effect”, and we know it was influential on Tesla because he mentioned it many times because it is the basis for MHD (Magneto-Hydro-Dynamic) generators and pumping, and was used by Tesla in his electro-propulsion.

Tesla stated that the “enormous electrostatic forces” emanating from the earth “rigidifies” the ether within earth’s electric field as it moves through space, “like a charged metal ball” (due as he would say to the earth’s movement through space at over 70,000 mph). To Tesla the ether was composed of “independent carriers,” “immersed in an insulating fluid” while this ether behaves as a solid to “heat” and “light”, it behaves like a “fluid” to solid bodies which are allowed to pass through it.

Pg 22

J.J. Thomson had stated in 1893 that if moving tubes of force entering a conductor are dissolved in it, mechanical momentum is given to the conductor, at right angles to the tubes and to the magnetic induction, and is proportional to the vector product of electric and magnetic forces.

According to the later research and publications of J.J. Thomson, he had mathematically developed the theory of moving tubes of force.

Pg 27

In 1963, I dubbed the ultra fine zero-point matter, “Omni Matter,” saying it is the source of all atomic matter. This is Tesla’s ether. Electrical content and electromagnetic force, in their most fine forms (ultra fine Omni Matter) and zero-point radiation in space) are very closely related to light (both visible and invisible)

‘Objective reality’ in the purely physical sense, may consist primarily of electric and magnetic force with ultra fine neutral particles, which in turn, compose all atomic mass. Since ‘gravity’ is the result of electrostatic imbalances to the equilibrium existing between ‘atomic matter’ and ether-filled space, rigidified by the effect of rapidly varying electrostatic disturbances, in the space within the proximity of a gravitational body’s electric field, a “super-gravity” force can be synthesized by creating an electric field stress which creates an even greater overpowering disturbance to the equilibrium which can be restored by the movement of the body so affected, until its positive satisfies the ‘equal and opposite reaction rule.’

This line of thinking seems to indicate how Tesla considered the so-called “nuclear reactions”…electromagnetic reactions which would produce powerful, very high frequency disturbances in the “zero point” neutral media” which react with atomic matter. These reactions are deemed ‘stronger’ than normal electromagnetic ones, since their disturbances are of such high force (voltage) levels, and of such high frequencies, as to react strongly (resonantly), with other atomic matter, sometimes to the “critical mass” stage of transmutation, such as that associated with thermonuclear explosions or implosions.

Pg 29

It is my belief that during a body’s movement through space surrounding our earth, the independent carriers, the Omni Matter, possessing independent ‘tubes of force’, are unified creating continuously extended tubes of electric and magnetic force, which I call “micro-helices”, swirling in parallel, tubular pathways through the body. A resistance (called “inertia”) is experienced by a body, against the force of movement, with a polarity of movement as acceleration progresses. There is a buildup of momentum (due to the very same mechanism as “intertia”). The inertia-resistance/momentum-perpetuation is encountered only with an increase or decrease in velocity, forcing the stubborn micro-helices into a different pitch (angle of turns) and frequency (turns per distance) of swirling electromagnetism, for each different velocity There is no friction at a constant velocity, at which the ether “gives back” what it “takes.”

Since a permanent magnet is composed of a medium (iron, usually) which has been magnetically aligned or polarized, some of the interpenetrating ZPR is arrested and separated into electric and magnetic components, and converted into magnetic flux, which is really a kind of “radioactivity.” The ZPR is the driving force behind this flux, which is strongest when aligned with the earth’s magnetic field, which in turn has polarized and converted some of the ZPR near or in the earth. The force of the flux will in turn separate moving positive and negative electric charges, more or less as the reciprocal of the mechanism by which the force of the ZPR has been diverted to create the magnetic flux. A permanent magnet can also be thought of as a “magnetic flux superconductor” which, like an ultra high frequency antenna, receives the ZPR and produces a magnetic flux.

Use of permanent magnets by Tesla, across a spark gap discharge, was intended to use the Hall Effect to break the discharge, by separating the positive and negative charges, in order to produce a more perfect sine wave. Inadvertently, Tesla discovered that electric spark discharges in oxygen and nitrogen, both below the atomic number 19, are thereby transmuted into alpha and beta charges (stripped helium nuclei with +2 charge ea, and electrons with -1 charges ea) by the powerful radiation produced, having a voltage potential of 12 Mev. Since this is almost three times the Mev. level of gamma radiation emitted by radium, it is certainly sufficient to explain the claims of Tesla, as traditional contemporary physics cannot explain such high voltages or radiation.

Pg 35

Radiation does not move through space, but is the result of electrical and magnetic disturbances from stored sources emanating into the zero-point system at various points, which activate and polarize the normally neutral Omni Matter, causing transmission in chain reactions, carrying the electromagnetic oscillations from a multitude of points A, to a multitude of points B. The Omni Matter is so fine that it is capable of super-transmitting electromagnetic disturbances from particle to particle, at all frequencies, simultaneously, in all directions, while self-restoring its own equilibrium. If e conceive of Omni Matter as tiny, identical globes composed of intertwined positive and negative bundles of electromagnetic force in equilibrium, densely packing all space like grains of sand, while ZPR simultaneously vibrates thorough it in all directions, it is possible to understand how equilibrium is maintained by the omni-directional ZPR

[webolife]

Excellent comparative posting lizzie. This is exactly the kind of tight "glossary" style information we/I need in order to make sense of each person's descriptive jargon. I learned more in this one post than in most other posts combined.

[lizzie]

This is interesting.

Gravitational Weight Reduction with ELF EM Radiation
http://jnaudin.free.fr/systemg/html/gravelf.htm

A paper published by DeAquino entitled "Gravitation and Electromagnetism; Correlation and Grand Unification" relates inertial and gravitational mass as a function of absorbed radiation. DeAquino demonstrates that gravitational mass of an atom is related to its inertial mass as a function of thermal and electromagnetic (EM) radiation absorption. This is significant since the relationship is subtractive terms causing a reduction of gravitational mass (weight) proportionate to absorbed electromagnetic energy. The weight reduction formula relates absorbed EM radiation energy by an atom (molecule) to the radiation frequency, as well as conduction, permeability and permittivity of the medium that the atom is a constituent. The formula gives an inverse relationship to frequency so extremely low frequency (ELF) absorbed energy yields the greatest weight reduction. In fact, the formula says for large energy absorption, the weight goes through zero and becomes negative (negative mass). Working with DeAquino, the author contributed to the design of an experimental apparatus to test the theory's equation validity. The experiment was successful yielding data supporting the calculated prediction. This opens the door to possible space access, power generation and Earth based zero gravity manufacturing facilities.

The Gravitational Spacecraft from Fran De Aquino
http://jnaudin.free.fr/systemg/html/gravcraft.htm

Behavior of Electric Current Subjected to ELF Electromagnetic Radiation
http://jnaudin.free.fr/systemg/html/elfvscur.htm

Correlation between Gravitational and Intertial Mass
http://jnaudin.free.fr/systemg/html/syshexp.htm

Gravitational Radiation and Oscillating Gravitational Dipoles
http://members.aol.com/overunity2/syste ... ravrad.htm

[lizzie]

The Coanda Effect
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/coanda.htm

The Vortex Technologies
http://members.aol.com/overunity2/syste ... ravrad.htm

Flying Saucer of Viktor Schauberger
http://evg-ars.narod.ru/shauberg1.htm

Schauberger created the ideal conditions for appearance of the group of mini-tornados and the central tornado, which is the motive force of the device. At the first stage by means of the wheel, air swirls around the axis of the electric motor. Due to centrifugal force the same air is thrown to the periphery, passes through "corkscrews" of the wheel and obtains rotation down axis of each "corkscrew". Air simultaneously swirls around 2 axes of rotation

Thus, 24 (9) balls (mini-vortices) roll inside the wall of the circle. The walls of each ball rotate in opposite directions with respect to the walls of the neighbor balls. These balls will be concerned as a dual medium: on the one hand it is a ball, since it rolls as a part of a ball bearing and laws of mechanics influenced on it, but at the same time it is air, for which laws of hydrodynamic are valid. These balls at any collision of their neighbors tend to collide to each other and thus simultaneously move to the center of the device. At the same time the opposite movement of walls of the neighbor balls represents a rarified medium, by Bernoulli's law. Thus the balls are "attracted" to each other. As a result, the whole mass of the rotating air is constricted towards the center, and then considerably accelerates (because the diameter of the device is decreasing). Finally this mass flies out the nozale, which is placed in the lower part of the device. The wheel with "corkscrews" rotates, and constantly supplying these minivortices-bearings, entrains air, which comes from inside...

Schauberger asserts that the process becomes to be self-sustaining. Natural tornado can exist for a long period of time and, obviously, the very existence of it is sustained only by pressure difference between environment and the internal cone of the tornado. The discharge zone is created in the very center of the device. It means that ambient air must approach there, after coming on the turbine blade and entraining in the rotation with complicated trajectory (such a rotation can be called a "self-eversible toroid").

It seems to me that these are the basic principles of operation of the device. Indeed, such a process can be concerned as an opposition to the ordinary explosion, since the matter does not move from the center but on the contrary, tends to constrict into the common point (to the top of the vortex). Schauberger called this process as implosion.

The rotating mini-vortices, which composite a tornado, are attracted to each other and tend to move to the basic center of rotation.