How the 'ecosystem' myth has been used for sinister means

Has science taken a wrong turn? If so, what corrections are needed? Chronicles of scientific misbehavior. The role of heretic-pioneers and forbidden questions in the sciences. Is peer review working? The perverse "consensus of leading scientists." Good public relations versus good science.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
User avatar
PersianPaladin
Posts: 668
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 8:38 am
Location: Turkey

How the 'ecosystem' myth has been used for sinister means

Post by PersianPaladin » Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:51 am

Very interesting article by Adam Curtis...it explores the origin of the theory of the Earth as an inter-connected "self-regulating eco-system" that apparently wants to achieve "equilibrium" and how this scientific theory has been linked with nefarious purposes.


Interesting excerpt:-
Biosphere 2 was a giant sealed world. Eight humans were locked in with a mass of flora and other fauna, and a balanced ecosystem was supposed to naturally emerge. But from the start it was completely unbalanced. The CO2 levels started soaring, so the experimenters desperately planted more green plants, but the CO2 continued to rise, then dissolved in the "ocean" and ate their precious coral reef. Millions of tiny mites attacked the vegetables and there was less and less food to eat. The men lost 18% of their body weight. Then millions of cockroaches took over. The moment the lights were turned out in the kitchen, hordes of roaches covered every surface. And it got worse – the oxygen in the world started to disappear and no one knew where it was going. The "bionauts" began to suffocate. And they began to hate one another – furious rows erupted that often ended with them spitting in one another's faces. A psychiatrist was brought in to see if they had gone insane, but concluded simply that it was a struggle for power.

Then millions of ants appeared from nowhere and waged war on the cockroaches. In 1993 the experiment collapsed in chaos and hatred.

The idea of nature that underpinned all these visions of self-organisation was a fantasy. A fantasy that was born at a time when those who ran the British empire were desperately trying to cling on to power as the dynamic forces of history whirled around them. So they turned to science to create a vision of a static world where everything is stable and your moral duty is to make sure that nothing ever changes.

The other problem with the self-organising system is that it cannot deal with power. Although it sees human beings all linked together in a system, its fundamental rule is that they must remain separate individuals. Alliances and coalitions would compromise the precious autonomy of the individual, and destabilise the system.

And in a Newsnight studio on a March evening this year, this is what you could hear. Lucy Annson insisted again and again to Emily Maitlis that she was only a spokesperson for herself, and under the rules of the network no one could stand back and judge the system. Emily said: "You're not a completely peaceful organisation." Lucy came back with the killer line: "I don't think anyone can make an assessment of that, other than the people involved in the actions themselves."

What the anti-cuts movement has done without realising is adopt an idea of how to order the world without hierarchies, a machine theory that leads to a static managerialism. It may be very good for organising creative and self-expressive demonstrations, but it will never change the world.

At the end of Biosphere 2 the ants destroyed the cockroaches. They then proceeded to eat through the silicone seal that enclosed the world. Through collective action the ants worked together and effectively destroyed the existing system. They then marched off into the Arizona desert. Who knows what they got up to there.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... sley-smuts

Sparky
Posts: 3517
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:20 pm

Re: How the 'ecosystem' myth has been used for sinister means

Post by Sparky » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:57 pm

Indeed, it is an interesting article. I had not heard anything about
Biosphere 2's outcome. Survival of the fittest, where conditions were optimized for humans, the ants won out.

What does this say about space travel? About colonizing another planet? Terra-forming Mars? Fat chance, in this or next century.
Unless we introduce roaches and ants and let them do it for us. :D
"It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire

sharonbaker
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:44 pm
Contact:

Re: How the 'ecosystem' myth has been used for sinister means

Post by sharonbaker » Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:54 pm

Awesome article friend.... Thanks for this great post...

mharratsc
Posts: 1405
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:37 am

Re: How the 'ecosystem' myth has been used for sinister means

Post by mharratsc » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:11 am

Wow, that's kinda freaky! :shock:


Thanks for posting this one, Hossein :)
Mike H.

"I have no fear to shout out my ignorance and let the Wise correct me, for every instance of such narrows the gulf between them and me." -- Michael A. Harrington

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests