Has science taken a wrong turn? If so, what corrections are needed? Chronicles of scientific misbehavior. The role of heretic-pioneers and forbidden questions in the sciences. Is peer review working? The perverse "consensus of leading scientists." Good public relations versus good science.
Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer
-
MrAmsterdam
- Posts: 596
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:59 am
Post
by MrAmsterdam » Wed Feb 23, 2011 1:11 pm
Toxic solutions are offered by the mainstream, where the safe, more efficient solutions are kept illegal.
You can see the same with the CO2 debate. Never ever do you hear any of the involved parties saying outloud that we would need to plant more trees. Without this cheaply-batteling-tree-fighting-off-the-evil-CO2-gas solution, any discussion is meaningless.
Mainstream is offering expensive unproven CO2 technology where free growing trees can do the same for your tax money.
Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. -Nikola Tesla -1934
-
Sparky
- Posts: 3517
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:20 pm
Post
by Sparky » Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:25 pm
hemp was a agricultural product around here till hysteria took control...i have waded through hemp growing wild in NW Missouri to get to a telephone repeater..this hemp was wild from crops that used to be raised there.
ethanol from hemp or corn is an equally stupid way to produce a fuel!...though hemp, when not raised instead of corn or other food crop, would be a good crop to raise on land not suitable to better crops, such as corn, wheat, etc...
"It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests