http://www.lnhatom.com/
Not much has come of the idea since 2006, so it may be sour grapes, but he is not aloneContrary to the assertions of Bohr and Rutherford, it is intuitively obvious that the structure and geometry of the nucleus must have a direct bearing on the properties of the atom as clearly evident in this radically new atomic model.
in suggesting there is a system that keeps a lid on new ideas.
http://www.lnhatom.com/faq.htmlThe biggest problem is censorship of the popular media, which historically resists publicizing revolutionary ideas. The AP and UPI news agencies actually have an official standing policy, dating back to the mid 20th century, to refrain from publishing anything outside the confines of mainstream peer reviewed scientific journals. Peer review certainly has its place, but it also effectively prevents publication of revolutionary concepts that might pose a threat to the established dogmas and "old boy" networks of the "science industry".
Big business and government are also involved in this conspiracy of suppression through corrupt regulatory practices and other means. The prospect of major changes including the demise of tax revenues from the fossil fuelled economy is not in their selfish interest, even though such issues are quite easily rectified and the upside benefits outweigh the negatives. Governments and big Biz are basically lazy and prefer "steady state" conditions. The advent of the information age has certainly improved things a lot, but even the internet is now experiencing a degree of censorship as some search engines choose not to list certain websites including this one for obvious reasons.