JaJa wrote:Hi Goldminer;
You already know that absolute kelvin is pretty much the end of internal motion
I was talking in terms of atomic vibration... if an atom was brought to a complete standstill or frozen in place wouldn't that be worthy of a Nobel Peace Prize - it would certainly cause uncertainty for Heisenbergs supporters? My point about Motion is that it doesn't appear to have a beginning...
I think philosophizing all day on nothing pretty much returns nothing.
I know my questions seem futile...
JJ
Well, there is no “vacuum.” To me, the confusion arises because one cannot say, refer to, or call, a region of space a “vacuum” if it contains and/or is composed of something. A “vacuum” is supposed to be an absence of “matter.” It is said that quantum-mechanical “virtual particles” are popping in and out of existence in said “vacuum” which directly contradicts the term. The author cites trying to construct one however the inability to shield gravity and the fact that absolute zero has not been achieved means that no matter how much “matter” one thinks they can exclude something still resides producing “latent heat.”
Whatever the nature, or phase, of the “matter” that does exist and/or comprises the remaining “space” allows for the presence (or production) of supposed “virtual particles” – said state, phase, or condition cannot be called a “vacuum” as something exist in order to produce said “virtual particles” and persist in radiating “latent heat.”
This, the nature of “space”, can get to be a heady topic but there are some things to consider with regard to these quandaries. For example:
The Nature of “Space”
James C. Maxwell understood the necessity of not having a ‘something comes from nothing.’ To that end he utilized “
quaternion” space i.e. the electromagnetic potential field (or ‘field of potential’) which was subsequently assailed, removed - and -towards the rejection of which he said:
"... The invention of the Calculus of Quaternions by Hamilton is a step towards the knowledge of quantities related to space which can only be compared for its importance with the invention of triple coordinates by Descartes. The limited use which has up to the present time been made of Quaternions must be attributed partly to the repugnance of most mature minds to new methods involving the expenditure of thought ..." –
Some Quternionic History
Just as certain frequencies have existed all along that can’t be seen with the naked eye; telescopes reveal fascinating activity occurring around stars and galaxies in the radio spectrum with plasma and electricity, electromagnetism, electric fields etc. Is it really that far of a stretch to consider that, as yet, not all of the phases and/or activities of “matter” can be, or have been, detected and/or deduced? Not to me. With Quaternions Maxwell considered “electric potential” (the “capacity” to do work) to be substantive ‘stuff.’ This was rejected (probably because it ascribes a quality to “space” such that “space” can ‘rotate’) just as the Aether was rejected by Einstein; despite the fact that he created his own version of a gravitational “space.”
It could not have been that ‘something sat in nothing’ or that ‘something came from nothing’ as WAMP’s theoretical impetus and vicarious confiscation of the mCBR has taught.
Cosmologically, it is rather obvious that the antigravitational property of 'latent heat' has tremendous implications. The reason why energy simultaneously unfolds Space and Time is due to a very primary property of defined energy states: that aside from secondary superimposition and phase coincidences, they tend to separate themselves from the continuum they compose, as if a minimum repulsion existed between the simplest units of energy. The deeper reason why the envelope of Space and Time does not and will not collapse is found precisely in the 'antigravitic' or 'repulsive' property of 'latent heat'. This is the deeper secret of it - which it has been Aetherometry's task both to unravel and to document. So if we are to address the problems of Space and Time as functions of energy, we must first understand they are functions of that 'latent' energy in massfree form. It is precisely this 'latent' energy in massfree form which, as scientists continue to attempt to cool down an atom in a trap to absolute zero, keeps stubbornly resisting; keeps using that atom as a pick-up antenna for the capture of 'latent heat' which the atom persistently converts into the little bursts of sensible heat it releases and which, for a mass of atoms, impede the researcher from ever being able to bring any atom to absolute zero. There is, in other words, a minimal thermal heat that atoms constantly propagate, vibrating with the waves of 'latent heat' that produce and unfold Space and Time. –
Why speak of an aether
JaJa wrote:Why is Time defined as a dimension when it seems to be a man-made concept used to measure change brought about by Motion. Without Motion - how could I define time?
You are correct imho. “Time” is a manmade construct stemming from quantification of the duration of events induced by ceaseless motion. Without motion one could not establish the construct called “Time.” The question is; what is the nature of that which persist in radiating latent heat which *may* be that which is not only in motion; but may also induce motion in more dense objects?
"Our laws of force tend to be applied in the Newtonian sense in that for every action there is an equal reaction, and yet, in the real world, where many-body gravitational effects or electrodynamic actions prevail, we do not have every action paired with an equal reaction." — Harold Aspden
