Casimir Effect Quantum Solutions

Has science taken a wrong turn? If so, what corrections are needed? Chronicles of scientific misbehavior. The role of heretic-pioneers and forbidden questions in the sciences. Is peer review working? The perverse "consensus of leading scientists." Good public relations versus good science.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Casimir Effect Quantum Solutions

Post by junglelord » Fri May 07, 2010 6:37 am

if you place two uncharged metal plates side by side in a vacuum, they will move towards each other, seemingly without reason. They won't move a lot, mind. Two plates with an area of a square metre placed one-thousandth of a millimetre apart will feel a force equivalent to just over a tenth of a gram.

The Dutch physicist Hendrik Casimir first noted this minuscule movement in 1948. "The Casimir effect is a manifestation of the quantum weirdness of the microscopic world," says physicist Steve Lamoreaux of Yale University.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2 ... thing.html
Or so the story goes.

There is another explanation for the Casimir effect and that is the inclusion of electrostatics as a fundamental force. If you do create a force model that is inclusive of electrostatic charge, you then find that the EM force is really the nuclear force, which will explain the attraction of the Casimir effect, without any quantum weirdness.

Infact if you examine the Casimir equation and understand the quantum constants, you will reveal the geometry of the aether as you investigate the Casimir equation.
Looking at the equation, we see the h*c in the numerator. In the Aether Physics Model, h*c is equal to the unit of the photon. "Casimir realised that between two plates, only those virtual photons whose wavelengths fit a whole number of times into the gap should be counted when calculating the vacuum energy," Gibbs said.
It is no error that the equation for the Casimir Effect has the unit for the photon in the numerator. But as will be seen shortly, the so-called "virtual photons" are mathematically shown to be the strong charge of the electron being acted upon in the same manner as elementary charge is acted upon.

The Casimir value is just 3.3% greater than the 16π2 value. In 1996 Steven Lamoreaux empirically measured the Casimir Effect to within 5% of the Casimir equation. So the assumed 16π2 value could be correct.

So what's the point of this exercise? 16π2 is the geometrical constant of the Aether in the Aether Physics Model. According to "The Force of Empty Space" by Focus (a publication of Physical Review), "...the most puzzling aspect of the theory is that the force depends on geometry: If the plates are replaced by hemispherical shells, the force is repulsive. Spherical surfaces somehow "enhance" the number of virtual photons." The shape of 16π2 resembles a corkscrew and it is equal to the spherical constant squared.

Even more interesting is that phtn/16π2 is equal to the strong charge of the electron times Coulomb's constant.
And so it appears that the Casimir effect is the result of the electron strong charge of the atoms in the metal plates affecting each other through a form of Coulomb's law.
Taking the area and lengths to be the quantum wavelength, the equation can be written and simplified

which is exactly the form of Coulombs law except that the force is calculated for the electron strong charge and not the electron elementary charge. The equation can be further developed to allow for the rmfd constant to replace Coulomb's constant. The rmfd constant is equal to 16π2 times Coulomb's constant:

To calculate the force between two Casimir plates, measure the strong charge of each plate (they may not be equal), divide by the distance between them squared, and multiply by the rmfd constant. The strong charge is easy to calculate as it is always proportional to the mass.

In short, the Casimir Effect is experimental proof that the Aether Physics Model is correct in its claim that eemax2 is the strong charge of the electron.

According to Gibbs, "The energy density decreases as the plates are moved closer which implies there is a small force drawing them together." That small force is the force of the Aether manifested as the rmfd constant and acting on the strong charge of the electron.

http://www.16pi2.com/joomla/forcephysic ... ffect.html
The identification of 16pi2 reveals a lot, as I always say structure and function cannot be seperated.

Quantification of electrostatic charge is the only way to a unified field theory.
Then you will see that EM charge is the nuclear strong force and the geometric difference between the two charges creates the so called "weak force". The so called gluons are not valid, but EM charge is very valid. ES charge is the only way to a balanced model. The structural difference b/t attraction and repulsion, based on the geometry of the plates is direct evidence of the geometry of the aether (rmfd) the rotating magnetic field.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests